Suction Drainage in the Management of Peri-operative Bleeding in Total and Unicomcompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT04508101

Last Updated: 2020-08-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

153 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-07

Study Completion Date

2020-09-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although, suction drainage is routinely used in orthopedic clinical practice, there are still no precise guidelines on its use in total joint arthroplasty, particularly in total as well as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. In fact, drain use is likely associated to an increased risk of blood transfusion due to the lack of tamponade effect, as well as a higher infection rate. Furthermore, the drain itself could interfere with knee mobilization, delaying its functional recovery. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the real usefulness of suction drainage in perioperative bleeding control in the management of total as well as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Knee arthroplasty is currently a widespread treatment either for osteoarthritis (OA) as well as other joint disorders. Specifically, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is commonly considered one of the most effective orthopedic procedure in the treatment of end-stage knee OA as well as various rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, leading to a substantial pain relief and functional improvement. Besides, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) represents a viable alternative in the treatment of unicompartmental knee OA showing a lower morbidity. Nevertheless, since knee arthroplasty involves soft tissue dissections and numerous bone cuts, several perioperative complications can be observed. Particularly, the subsequent local hemorrhage can lead to anemia, functional limitation, nerve palsy as well as increase in wound tension resulting in healing impairment. Moreover, the local hematoma could represent a growth environment for bacteria. Although TKA usually shows a higher hemorrhage rate, some patients undergoing UKA still show the aforementioned complications. Accordingly, intraarticular suction drainage placement can likely ease the hematoma drain, leading to swelling decrease, surgical wound healing improvement as well as reduction of postoperative infections. However, despite suction drainage is routinely used in TKA as well as UKA, there are still no precise guidelines and its effectiveness remains controversial. Indeed, drain use is likely associated to an increased risk of blood transfusion due to the lack of tamponade effect, as well as a higher infection rate. Moreover, the drainage conduit could obstruct physiotherapy leading to a delayed recovery. Therefore, since fast-track program has been increasingly applied in the management of TKA and UKA, an early drainage removal is recommended. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the real usefulness of suction drainage in perioperative bleeding control in the management of TKA and UKA.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blood Loss, Surgical

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

drainage group

Patients satisfying inclusion criteria who underwent either total as well as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with suction drainage positioning

No interventions assigned to this group

non-drainage group

Patients satisfying inclusion criteria who underwent either total as well as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty without suction drainage positioning

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* knee osteoarthritis diagnosis
* No contraindications to antithrombotic prophylaxis
* Availability of blood tests results before surgery as well as in the first three postoperative days.
* Detailed description of clinical records

Exclusion Criteria

* contraindications to antithrombotic prophylaxis
* anti-platelet therapy
* knee arthroplasty revision indication
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cristiana Balbino, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

PIERLUIGI PIRONTI, MD

Role: CONTACT

+39 3385362097

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Manta N, Mangiavini L, Balbino C, Colombo A, Pandini EG, Pironti P, Vigano M, D'Anchise R. The role of suction drainage in the management of peri-operative bleeding in Total and Unicomcompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 10;22(1):1031. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04868-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34893042 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DRGIN1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.