High Versus Low Dose Serratus Anterior Plane Block After Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery.

NCT ID: NCT06205875

Last Updated: 2025-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-21

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to compare the efficacy and quality of pain relief provided by the high-dose serratus anterior plane (SAP) block with the standard SAP block in preventing and treating acute postoperative pain after total endoscopic aortic or mitral valve surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

During the last two decades, cardiac surgical techniques have changed dramatically. Evidence for good short and long-term outcomes after endovascular and minimally invasive procedures is rising. This shift made it possible to avoid sternotomy and thus facilitating earlier patient recovery without compromising safety. Therefore, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to aim for early extubation and ambulation. While policies for early extubation and discharge from the hospital have been implemented, the analgesic regimen has not been modified. Opioids remain the standard treatment in the postoperative setting after cardiac surgery despite known side effects such as nausea, constipation and the risk of addiction. Neuraxial anaesthesia techniques, which require fewer opioids in cardiac surgery, have been studied and validated but not yet implemented.

In 2013, the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block was described as a pain relief option for chest surgery. This anaesthesia technique injects local anaesthetics under the serratus muscle and between the latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior using ultrasound. Successful pain relief with this SAP block has been reported in thoracotomy, chest surgery, and rib fractures. In our previous study, we demonstrated a 40% reduction in morphine consumption during the first 24 hours after total endoscopic aortic valve replacement with an SAP block compared to a control group without an SAP block. Lower pain scores were also observed in the SAP group

As such, in this proposed study, we aim to optimise the intensity of the Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) to decrease opioid requirements further and to encounter more favourable secondary clinical outcome parameters. One strategy to increase the duration of action of plane blocks is injecting higher doses of local anaesthetics. A meta-analysis by De Oliveira et al. on transabdominal plane (TAP)-blocks for abdominal surgery showed a correlation between the local anaesthetic dose and the late block effect, impacting both pain scores and opioid consumption. In a randomised controlled trial by Suresh, a TAP block with bupivacaine 1.25 mcg/kg was compared to a TAP block with bupivacaine 2.5 mcg/kg, revealing a longer duration of analgesia and a lower need for additional analgesics up to 24 hours post-surgery. Moreover, loading doses up to 2mg/kg body weight are recommended for truncal blocks in general, but the mean injected dose in our intervention group was 1.25mg/kg, considering a mean patient body weight of 79.2kg. Notably, a pharmacokinetic study by Maximos and colleagues on an adrenalised bupivacaine mixture after pectointercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) after cardiac surgery showed that, despite injecting 2mcg/kg adrenalised bupivacain, both total and free arterial serum bupivacaine levels were 10-20 times lower than levels associated with neurologic or cardiovascular toxicity in the literature.

In conclusion, we are convinced we can safely improve the late effects of our SAPB compared to our first study by increasing the dose of the local anesthetic injectate.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Analgesia Surgery Cardiac Disease Post Operative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This trial is designed as a mono-center, double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled superiority trail comparing 2 groups of patients
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

Patients in the intervention group will receive a mixture of high-dose local anesthetic and epinephrine administered via a serratus anterior plane block.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High dose serratus anterior plane block (2.4 mg/kg patient ideal body weight)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The needle will be introduced in-plane from supero-anterior to postero-inferior until the needle tip is positioned in the plane underneath the serratus muscle (deep compartment). Under continuous ultrasound guidance, 3/4th of the bupivacaine 0.25% plus epinephrine solution will be injected in the deep compartment. After the deep component of the serratus anterior plane block is completed, the needle will be withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissues. The needle will be flattened and advanced in-plane to the plane superficial to the serratus muscles. The remainder quarter of the bupivacaine 0.25% plus epinephrine solution will be injected superficial to the serratus muscles after correct placement of the needle tip is confirmed on ultrasound. In total a dose of 2.4mg/kg patient ideal body weight will be administered. There is a maximal dose of 200 mg adrenalized bupivacaine for patients with an ideal body weight of 83 kg or more.

PCIA with morphine

Intervention Type DRUG

A patient controlled intravenous analgesia system (Bodyguard 595 Colorvision®) with morphine (Sterop®) using following settings: bolus 1.5 mg and lockout interval 7 min with maximal dose of 30mg per 4 hours.

Control group

Patients in the control group will receive a serratus anterior plane block with a low dose local anesthetic (based upon our primary trial).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Low dose serratus anterior plane block (1.2mg/kg patient ideal body weight)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The needle will be introduced in-plane from supero-anterior to postero-inferior until the needle tip is positioned in the plane underneath the serratus muscle (deep compartment). Under continuous ultrasound guidance, 3/4th of the bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected in the deep compartment. After the deep component of the serratus anterior plane block is completed, the needle will be withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissues. The needle will be flattened and advanced in-plane to the plane superficial to the serratus muscles. The remainder quarter of the bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected superficial to the serratus muscles after correct placement of the needle tip is confirmed on ultrasound.

PCIA with morphine

Intervention Type DRUG

A patient controlled intravenous analgesia system (Bodyguard 595 Colorvision®) with morphine (Sterop®) using following settings: bolus 1.5 mg and lockout interval 7 min with maximal dose of 30mg per 4 hours.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High dose serratus anterior plane block (2.4 mg/kg patient ideal body weight)

The needle will be introduced in-plane from supero-anterior to postero-inferior until the needle tip is positioned in the plane underneath the serratus muscle (deep compartment). Under continuous ultrasound guidance, 3/4th of the bupivacaine 0.25% plus epinephrine solution will be injected in the deep compartment. After the deep component of the serratus anterior plane block is completed, the needle will be withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissues. The needle will be flattened and advanced in-plane to the plane superficial to the serratus muscles. The remainder quarter of the bupivacaine 0.25% plus epinephrine solution will be injected superficial to the serratus muscles after correct placement of the needle tip is confirmed on ultrasound. In total a dose of 2.4mg/kg patient ideal body weight will be administered. There is a maximal dose of 200 mg adrenalized bupivacaine for patients with an ideal body weight of 83 kg or more.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Low dose serratus anterior plane block (1.2mg/kg patient ideal body weight)

The needle will be introduced in-plane from supero-anterior to postero-inferior until the needle tip is positioned in the plane underneath the serratus muscle (deep compartment). Under continuous ultrasound guidance, 3/4th of the bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected in the deep compartment. After the deep component of the serratus anterior plane block is completed, the needle will be withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissues. The needle will be flattened and advanced in-plane to the plane superficial to the serratus muscles. The remainder quarter of the bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected superficial to the serratus muscles after correct placement of the needle tip is confirmed on ultrasound.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PCIA with morphine

A patient controlled intravenous analgesia system (Bodyguard 595 Colorvision®) with morphine (Sterop®) using following settings: bolus 1.5 mg and lockout interval 7 min with maximal dose of 30mg per 4 hours.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PCIA with Sterop

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Scheduled for elective aortic valve surgery or elective mitral valve surgery via right anterolateral thoracotomy
* Adult patients (minimally 18 years old)
* Bodyweight \> 50kg
* EuroScore ii \< 3%

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate
* Inability to communicate due to language or neurologic barriers
* Inability to control and self-administer opioids with PCIA or to comprehend the NRS pain score due to confusion or learning difficulties
* Chronic use of opioids
* Chronic use of analgesic antidepressants and/or antiepileptics
* Use of prohibited medication which possibly interacts with bupivacaine-epinephrine or opioids (mexiletine, ketoconazole, theophylline, IMAO, Digitalis and cimetidine)
* History of major trauma or surgery to right chest wall
* History of chronic pain at right chest wall
* Allergy to opioids and/or local anesthetics
* Allergy to paracetamol
* Class 3 obesity (BMI 40 or more)
* Pregnancy
* Intraoperative events compromising early postoperative recovery (aortic dissection, systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve, cardiac tamponade, brady-arrhytmias requiring external pacing,...)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jessa Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stessel Björn

Principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jessa hospital

Hasselt, Limburg, Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Björn Stessel, Dr

Role: CONTACT

003211222107

Ina Callebout, PhD

Role: CONTACT

003211339848

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Björn Stessel, Dr.

Role: primary

003211339856

Ina Callebaut, PhD

Role: backup

003211339848

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

f/2023/119

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SPSIP Block and Opioid Use After MICS
NCT07259824 RECRUITING NA
ESP vs ESP With PECS
NCT03592485 COMPLETED PHASE4