Effect of PECS II, Parasternal and Serratus Plane Blocks on Postoperative Pain in MIDCAB Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06584981

Last Updated: 2025-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

88 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

AIM: It was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pectoral nerve block (PECS II), parasternal and serratus plane blocks in postoperative analgesia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MIDCAB).

INTRODUCTION: The frequency of minimally invasive cardiac surgery has increased in recent years. With this method, Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operations can be performed without sternotomy. It is a beneficial method for early postoperative mobilization, early recovery and better aesthetic appearance. Since there is a surgical intervention between the ribs, pain control is important in these patients.

METHOD: In the preoperative evaluation of patients planned for CABG, PECS II, parasternal and serratus plane blocks are routinely recommended for postoperative pain control. Consent for the procedure is obtained from patients who accept this procedure. After induction and before the surgical incision, these block applications are performed under sterile conditions under the guidance of ultrasonography. Standard intravenous analgesic agents are applied to our patients who do not accept block applications. The hospital core system files of our patients who underwent cardiac surgery with minimally invasive intervention in our hospital between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021 will be scanned retrospectively. Patients with and without block application will be divided into two groups. From our patients' files; Demographic data, extubation time, drain site and incision site pain at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 12th, 24th, 48th and 72nd hours after extubation will be noted. In addition, it will be noted whether there is a need for additional rescue analgesia in cases where block is performed. The data obtained will be evaluated statistically and the results will be published in national or international scientific journals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients who underwent block

Patients who underwent pectoral nerve block (PECS II), parasternal and serratus plane blocks will be included in this group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

pectoral nerve block (PECS II), parasternal and serratus plane blocks

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

These block applications are performed under sterile conditions under the guidance of ultrasonography

Patients who did not receive block

Patients who were not given a block and received standard intravenous analgesics will be included in this group.

Group Type OTHER

analgesic

Intervention Type OTHER

Analgesia needs of patients who do not receive blockade are met with intravenous drugs.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

pectoral nerve block (PECS II), parasternal and serratus plane blocks

These block applications are performed under sterile conditions under the guidance of ultrasonography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

analgesic

Analgesia needs of patients who do not receive blockade are met with intravenous drugs.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients aged 18 and over
* Patients who underwent MIDCAB surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under 18 years of age
* Patients who did not undergo MIDCAB surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hisar Intercontinental Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hasan Hüseyin KILIÇ

Hasan Huseyin Kilic

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hisar Intercontinental Hospital

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gautam S, Pande S, Agarwal A, Agarwal SK, Rastogi A, Shamshery C, Singh A. Evaluation of Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing MIDCAB Surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2020 Mar/Apr;15(2):148-154. doi: 10.1177/1556984520908962.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32352903 (View on PubMed)

Morimoto Y, Sakata M, Ohno A, Maegawa T, Tajima S. [Effects of bofu-tsusho-san, a traditional Chinese medicine, on body fat accumulation in fructose-loaded rats]. Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 2001 Jan;117(1):77-86. doi: 10.1254/fpj.117.77. Japanese.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11233300 (View on PubMed)

Moll V, Ward CT, Jabaley CS, O'Reilly-Shah VN, Boorman DW, McKenzie-Brown AM, Halkos ME, Prabhakar A, Pyronneau LR, Schmidt PC. Erector Spinae Regional Anesthesia for Robotic Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Is Not Associated With Reduced Postoperative Opioid Use: A Retrospective Observational Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jul;35(7):2034-2042. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.09.112. Epub 2020 Sep 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33127286 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HisarH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ESPB vs TPVB for Cardiac Surgery
NCT05476393 WITHDRAWN NA