PECS-II vs ESP in Nociception Level Index Guided Breast Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07002541

Last Updated: 2025-06-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-01

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

Breast surgery is often associated with significant perioperative pain. While systemic opioids are commonly used, their side effects (nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, delayed recovery) have encouraged the adoption of regional anesthesia techniques for better analgesia and reduced opioid requirements. PECS-II and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) blocks are two effective regional techniques frequently utilized in breast surgery. However, comparative data on their impact on intraoperative opioid consumption under nociception-guided anesthesia remains limited.

The Nociception Level Index (NOL) is an objective monitoring tool that integrates multiple physiological signals (e.g., heart rate variability, skin conductance, pulse amplitude) to assess nociceptive responses in real-time. When used intraoperatively, it enables more precise opioid titration, potentially optimizing analgesia while minimizing opioid exposure.

Objective:

To compare the efficacy of PECS-II and ESP blocks in reducing intraoperative remifentanil consumption during breast surgery under general anesthesia guided by NOL monitoring.

Methods:

This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Koç University Hospital following ethical approval. Ninety female patients aged 18-80 years, classified as ASA I-III and scheduled for elective mastectomy or other breast surgeries, were randomly assigned into three groups (n=30 each):

Group 1 (PECS-II Block) Group 2 (ESP Block) Group 3 (Control - no block) Regional blocks were performed before surgery with ultrasound guidance. PECS-II block was administered at the 3rd to 5th rib levels in the mid-axillary line using 30 mL of 0.3% bupivacaine. ESP block was applied at T2-T5 levels with a total of 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine.

All patients received standardized general anesthesia, including propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium, and desflurane maintenance. Remifentanil infusion (0.05-0.1 μg/kg/min) was titrated based on NOL values every 5 minutes: increased by 0.03 μg/kg/min if NOL \>25, and decreased by 0.03 μg/kg/min if NOL \<10.

Data collected included:

Total intraoperative remifentanil consumption (primary outcome) NOL scores every 5 minutes Postoperative pain scores (NRS) at 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours (at rest and with arm abduction) Total opioid consumption (morphine, tramadol) in the first 24 hours Opioid-related side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus) Length of hospital stay Blinding was applied to data collectors (pain nurses and anesthesia technicians), but due to the nature of the procedures, surgeons and anesthesiologists were not blinded.

Statistical Analysis:

Data were analyzed using SPSS v26. Continuous variables were tested for normality (Shapiro-Wilk), and analyzed with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square tests. Significance was set at p\<0.05.

Expected Outcomes and Contribution:

It is hypothesized that both PECS-II and ESP blocks will significantly reduce intraoperative remifentanil consumption compared to the control group. Furthermore, these blocks may improve postoperative pain control, reduce opioid-related side effects, and shorten recovery time.

This study aims to clarify the relative efficacy of two widely used regional blocks in the context of objective, nociception-guided anesthesia. The findings are expected to support evidence-based use of regional techniques in breast surgery and contribute to the growing body of literature emphasizing opioid-sparing strategies in perioperative care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intraoperative Pain Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PECS-II group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PECS II block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The PECS-II block is an ultrasound-guided interfascial plane block designed to provide analgesia for surgeries involving the anterolateral chest wall, particularly breast surgery. It is an extension of the PECS-I block, which targets the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. In the PECS-II technique, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is used to identify the fascial planes. A 22G, 50 mm regional block needle is advanced in-plane under sterile conditions. A total of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is administered: 10 mL is injected between the pectoralis major and minor muscles (targeting the pectoral nerves), and 20 mL between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles (to block the lateral branches of intercostal nerves and intercostobrachial nerve).

ESP group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ESP block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a fascial plane block performed under ultrasound guidance to provide multimodal analgesia for thoracic and abdominal surgeries, including breast procedures. In this technique, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is used to visualize the transverse process of the thoracic vertebra, typically at the T4-T5 level. With the patient in a seated position and under standard sterile conditions, a 22G, 50 mm regional block needle is inserted in-plane until the tip reaches the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. After negative aspiration, 1-2 mL of test dose is injected to confirm correct needle placement by observing separation of fascial layers. Then, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected incrementally.

Control group

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PECS II block

The PECS-II block is an ultrasound-guided interfascial plane block designed to provide analgesia for surgeries involving the anterolateral chest wall, particularly breast surgery. It is an extension of the PECS-I block, which targets the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. In the PECS-II technique, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is used to identify the fascial planes. A 22G, 50 mm regional block needle is advanced in-plane under sterile conditions. A total of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is administered: 10 mL is injected between the pectoralis major and minor muscles (targeting the pectoral nerves), and 20 mL between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles (to block the lateral branches of intercostal nerves and intercostobrachial nerve).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ESP block

The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a fascial plane block performed under ultrasound guidance to provide multimodal analgesia for thoracic and abdominal surgeries, including breast procedures. In this technique, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is used to visualize the transverse process of the thoracic vertebra, typically at the T4-T5 level. With the patient in a seated position and under standard sterile conditions, a 22G, 50 mm regional block needle is inserted in-plane until the tip reaches the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. After negative aspiration, 1-2 mL of test dose is injected to confirm correct needle placement by observing separation of fascial layers. Then, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected incrementally.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Female patients aged 18 to 80 years ASA Physical Status Classification I-III

Scheduled for elective unilateral or bilateral breast surgery, including one or more of the following:

Lumpectomy with axillary lymph node biopsy or dissection Breast reconstruction Breast reduction Mastopexy Implant expander removal or placement

Exclusion Criteria

Morbid obesity (BMI \> 40 kg/m²) Presence of non-sinus cardiac rhythm Chronic opioid use (defined as daily use for \>2 weeks in the last month or total use \>4 weeks) History of opioid abuse or dependence Comorbidities causing moderate to severe functional limitation Inability to communicate with study personnel or follow instructions Pregnancy or breastfeeding Known allergy or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine or any study-related medication

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Koç University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kamil Darcin

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Koc University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ilayda Kalyoncu Karahan, MD

Role: CONTACT

+905325105014

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Omur Ercelen, Professor

Role: primary

+905325105014

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024.424.IRB1.047

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ESP in Breast Surgery Due to Cancer
NCT04726878 COMPLETED PHASE4
IPP-PSP Block vs. SPSIPB in Breast Surgery
NCT07246720 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA