PECS-II vs ESP in Nociception Level Index Guided Breast Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07002541
Last Updated: 2025-06-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-01
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Breast surgery is often associated with significant perioperative pain. While systemic opioids are commonly used, their side effects (nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, delayed recovery) have encouraged the adoption of regional anesthesia techniques for better analgesia and reduced opioid requirements. PECS-II and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) blocks are two effective regional techniques frequently utilized in breast surgery. However, comparative data on their impact on intraoperative opioid consumption under nociception-guided anesthesia remains limited.
The Nociception Level Index (NOL) is an objective monitoring tool that integrates multiple physiological signals (e.g., heart rate variability, skin conductance, pulse amplitude) to assess nociceptive responses in real-time. When used intraoperatively, it enables more precise opioid titration, potentially optimizing analgesia while minimizing opioid exposure.
Objective:
To compare the efficacy of PECS-II and ESP blocks in reducing intraoperative remifentanil consumption during breast surgery under general anesthesia guided by NOL monitoring.
Methods:
This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Koç University Hospital following ethical approval. Ninety female patients aged 18-80 years, classified as ASA I-III and scheduled for elective mastectomy or other breast surgeries, were randomly assigned into three groups (n=30 each):
Group 1 (PECS-II Block) Group 2 (ESP Block) Group 3 (Control - no block) Regional blocks were performed before surgery with ultrasound guidance. PECS-II block was administered at the 3rd to 5th rib levels in the mid-axillary line using 30 mL of 0.3% bupivacaine. ESP block was applied at T2-T5 levels with a total of 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine.
All patients received standardized general anesthesia, including propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium, and desflurane maintenance. Remifentanil infusion (0.05-0.1 μg/kg/min) was titrated based on NOL values every 5 minutes: increased by 0.03 μg/kg/min if NOL \>25, and decreased by 0.03 μg/kg/min if NOL \<10.
Data collected included:
Total intraoperative remifentanil consumption (primary outcome) NOL scores every 5 minutes Postoperative pain scores (NRS) at 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours (at rest and with arm abduction) Total opioid consumption (morphine, tramadol) in the first 24 hours Opioid-related side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus) Length of hospital stay Blinding was applied to data collectors (pain nurses and anesthesia technicians), but due to the nature of the procedures, surgeons and anesthesiologists were not blinded.
Statistical Analysis:
Data were analyzed using SPSS v26. Continuous variables were tested for normality (Shapiro-Wilk), and analyzed with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square tests. Significance was set at p\<0.05.
Expected Outcomes and Contribution:
It is hypothesized that both PECS-II and ESP blocks will significantly reduce intraoperative remifentanil consumption compared to the control group. Furthermore, these blocks may improve postoperative pain control, reduce opioid-related side effects, and shorten recovery time.
This study aims to clarify the relative efficacy of two widely used regional blocks in the context of objective, nociception-guided anesthesia. The findings are expected to support evidence-based use of regional techniques in breast surgery and contribute to the growing body of literature emphasizing opioid-sparing strategies in perioperative care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. PECS I-II Blocks After Breast-conserving Surgery
NCT06758765
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With PECS II Block in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
NCT03811262
Comparison of Bi-level Erector Spine Plane Block and Combined Pectoral I-II Block in Breast Surgery
NCT04689581
The Effect of Double Injection Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain Following Breast Surgery
NCT03415646
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery
NCT03480958
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PECS-II group
PECS II block
The PECS-II block is an ultrasound-guided interfascial plane block designed to provide analgesia for surgeries involving the anterolateral chest wall, particularly breast surgery. It is an extension of the PECS-I block, which targets the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. In the PECS-II technique, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is used to identify the fascial planes. A 22G, 50 mm regional block needle is advanced in-plane under sterile conditions. A total of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is administered: 10 mL is injected between the pectoralis major and minor muscles (targeting the pectoral nerves), and 20 mL between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles (to block the lateral branches of intercostal nerves and intercostobrachial nerve).
ESP group
ESP block
The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a fascial plane block performed under ultrasound guidance to provide multimodal analgesia for thoracic and abdominal surgeries, including breast procedures. In this technique, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is used to visualize the transverse process of the thoracic vertebra, typically at the T4-T5 level. With the patient in a seated position and under standard sterile conditions, a 22G, 50 mm regional block needle is inserted in-plane until the tip reaches the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. After negative aspiration, 1-2 mL of test dose is injected to confirm correct needle placement by observing separation of fascial layers. Then, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected incrementally.
Control group
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PECS II block
The PECS-II block is an ultrasound-guided interfascial plane block designed to provide analgesia for surgeries involving the anterolateral chest wall, particularly breast surgery. It is an extension of the PECS-I block, which targets the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. In the PECS-II technique, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is used to identify the fascial planes. A 22G, 50 mm regional block needle is advanced in-plane under sterile conditions. A total of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is administered: 10 mL is injected between the pectoralis major and minor muscles (targeting the pectoral nerves), and 20 mL between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles (to block the lateral branches of intercostal nerves and intercostobrachial nerve).
ESP block
The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a fascial plane block performed under ultrasound guidance to provide multimodal analgesia for thoracic and abdominal surgeries, including breast procedures. In this technique, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is used to visualize the transverse process of the thoracic vertebra, typically at the T4-T5 level. With the patient in a seated position and under standard sterile conditions, a 22G, 50 mm regional block needle is inserted in-plane until the tip reaches the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. After negative aspiration, 1-2 mL of test dose is injected to confirm correct needle placement by observing separation of fascial layers. Then, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected incrementally.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Scheduled for elective unilateral or bilateral breast surgery, including one or more of the following:
Lumpectomy with axillary lymph node biopsy or dissection Breast reconstruction Breast reduction Mastopexy Implant expander removal or placement
Exclusion Criteria
\-
18 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Koç University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kamil Darcin
Associate professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Koc University
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024.424.IRB1.047
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.