PECS I Block vs. Local Infiltration in Breast Augmentation Pain Management
NCT ID: NCT06719726
Last Updated: 2025-07-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-03
2025-02-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Pectoral Nerve Block for Breast Reduction Surgery
NCT03857386
Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. PECS I-II Blocks After Breast-conserving Surgery
NCT06758765
Comparison of PECS II Block and Combined Serratus Anterior Plane Block to Reduce Acute Pain After Mastectomy
NCT05961735
Ultrasound Guided Pecs Block and Ketamine Infusion for Preventing Chronic Pain in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
NCT07197684
A Comparative Study of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption Following Breast and Axillary Dissection Surgery
NCT06833697
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To address postoperative pain in breast augmentation, various techniques, including regional anesthesia such as pectoral nerve blocks, local anesthetic infiltration, and pocket irrigation, are employed.
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of preoperative PECS I block and intraoperative local anesthetic infiltration in managing postoperative pain following breast augmentation surgery. The primary focus was to evaluate their impact on postoperative pain levels, perioperative remifentanil and postoperative opioid consumption and opioid-related side effects during the early recovery period.
This prospective, double-blind, split-body design study was conducted at Yeditepe University Faculty of Medicine, Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery Department, in collaboration with the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department.
The anesthesia induction and PECS I blocks for the right breasts were performed by the same anesthesiologist in all patients (O.K.). Breast augmentation surgeries and local anesthetic infiltrations for the left breasts were performed by the same plastic surgeon (M.E.). Postoperative pain assessments were conducted by a different anesthesiologist who was blinded to the study design.
Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = unbearable pain." Pain assessments were performed every 30 minutes for the first 2 hours, every 2 hours between 2 and 6 hours, and at the 24ᵗʰ hour postoperatively.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
PECS I block: Administered to the right breast by an anesthesiologist before surgery.
Local anesthetic infiltration: Performed on the left breast by the plastic surgeon during surgery.
This design allowed for direct comparison of the efficacy of the two interventions (PECS I block vs. local anesthetic infiltration) in managing postoperative pain within the same participant.
The crossover and split-body methodology minimized inter-individual variability and provided robust data on the relative effectiveness of each technique, as all other surgical and anesthetic factors were standardized across both sides.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PECS I Block Intervention Arm
This arm involves the application of a preoperative PECS I block with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance. The intervention targets the right breast, aiming to evaluate its effectiveness in managing postoperative pain compared to local anesthetic infiltration.
PECS I Block
The PECS I block is a regional anesthesia technique performed preoperatively under ultrasound guidance. It involves the injection of 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscles to block the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. This procedure targets the right breast in the study to reduce postoperative pain and is compared to local anesthetic infiltration.
Local Anesthetic Infiltration Intervention Arm
This arm involves the administration of intraoperative local anesthetic infiltration using 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under direct visualization. The intervention targets the left breast, aiming to compare its effectiveness in managing postoperative pain against the PECS I block.
Local Anesthetic Infiltration
Local anesthetic infiltration involves the intraoperative administration of 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under direct visualization into the pectoralis major muscle prior to muscle transection. This procedure targets the left breast in the study for pain management and is compared to the PECS I block.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PECS I Block
The PECS I block is a regional anesthesia technique performed preoperatively under ultrasound guidance. It involves the injection of 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscles to block the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. This procedure targets the right breast in the study to reduce postoperative pain and is compared to local anesthetic infiltration.
Local Anesthetic Infiltration
Local anesthetic infiltration involves the intraoperative administration of 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under direct visualization into the pectoralis major muscle prior to muscle transection. This procedure targets the left breast in the study for pain management and is compared to the PECS I block.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I or II.
* Scheduled for primary breast augmentation surgery using a dual-plane or submuscular approach.
* Planned to receive silicone implants of identical volume and shape for both breasts.
* Able to provide written informed consent.
* Willing and able to comply with study procedures and follow-up assessments.
Exclusion Criteria
* Undergoing revision breast surgery.
* History of breast disease, previous breast or axillary surgery, or breast cancer.
* Preoperative breast pain or chronic pain syndromes (e.g., fibromyalgia, chronic headaches, back pain, complex regional pain syndrome, neuropathic pain, osteoarthritis, or radicular pain).
* BIRADS score \> 3 based on imaging (ultrasound/mammography) within the past year.
* Allergy to medications used in the study (e.g., bupivacaine, propofol, fentanyl, sevoflurane, cefazolin, paracetamol, ondansetron, tramadol, or morphine HCl).
* Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders.
* Pregnant or at risk of pregnancy.
* Inability to provide informed consent or communication difficulties.
* Significant medical conditions that may interfere with the study outcomes.
18 Years
59 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yeditepe University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mert Ersan
Asst. Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mert Ersan, Asst.Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yeditepe University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yeditepe University Kozyatagi Hospital
Istanbul, Atasehir, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-KAEK-21/1031
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.