PECS I Block vs. Local Infiltration in Breast Augmentation Pain Management

NCT ID: NCT06719726

Last Updated: 2025-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-03

Study Completion Date

2025-02-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of preoperative PECS I block and intraoperative local anesthetic infiltration in managing postoperative pain following breast augmentation surgery. The primary focus was to evaluate their impact on postoperative pain levels, perioperative remifentanil and postoperative opioid consumption and opioid-related side effects during the early recovery period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast augmentation is one of the most performed procedures in aesthetic surgery worldwide.These techniques, which involve muscle dissection and manipulation, tend to be more painful compared to subglandular and subfascial placements. Thus, managing postoperative pain effectively becomes a critical aspect of patient recovery and satisfaction.

To address postoperative pain in breast augmentation, various techniques, including regional anesthesia such as pectoral nerve blocks, local anesthetic infiltration, and pocket irrigation, are employed.

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of preoperative PECS I block and intraoperative local anesthetic infiltration in managing postoperative pain following breast augmentation surgery. The primary focus was to evaluate their impact on postoperative pain levels, perioperative remifentanil and postoperative opioid consumption and opioid-related side effects during the early recovery period.

This prospective, double-blind, split-body design study was conducted at Yeditepe University Faculty of Medicine, Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery Department, in collaboration with the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department.

The anesthesia induction and PECS I blocks for the right breasts were performed by the same anesthesiologist in all patients (O.K.). Breast augmentation surgeries and local anesthetic infiltrations for the left breasts were performed by the same plastic surgeon (M.E.). Postoperative pain assessments were conducted by a different anesthesiologist who was blinded to the study design.

Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = unbearable pain." Pain assessments were performed every 30 minutes for the first 2 hours, every 2 hours between 2 and 6 hours, and at the 24ᵗʰ hour postoperatively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Augmentation Pain Management in Postoperative Care Pain Management After Surgery Pain Management

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This study utilized a Crossover design with a split-body approach, where each participant served as their own control. The intervention involved two pain management techniques:

PECS I block: Administered to the right breast by an anesthesiologist before surgery.

Local anesthetic infiltration: Performed on the left breast by the plastic surgeon during surgery.

This design allowed for direct comparison of the efficacy of the two interventions (PECS I block vs. local anesthetic infiltration) in managing postoperative pain within the same participant.

The crossover and split-body methodology minimized inter-individual variability and provided robust data on the relative effectiveness of each technique, as all other surgical and anesthetic factors were standardized across both sides.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PECS I Block Intervention Arm

This arm involves the application of a preoperative PECS I block with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance. The intervention targets the right breast, aiming to evaluate its effectiveness in managing postoperative pain compared to local anesthetic infiltration.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PECS I Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The PECS I block is a regional anesthesia technique performed preoperatively under ultrasound guidance. It involves the injection of 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscles to block the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. This procedure targets the right breast in the study to reduce postoperative pain and is compared to local anesthetic infiltration.

Local Anesthetic Infiltration Intervention Arm

This arm involves the administration of intraoperative local anesthetic infiltration using 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under direct visualization. The intervention targets the left breast, aiming to compare its effectiveness in managing postoperative pain against the PECS I block.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Local Anesthetic Infiltration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anesthetic infiltration involves the intraoperative administration of 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under direct visualization into the pectoralis major muscle prior to muscle transection. This procedure targets the left breast in the study for pain management and is compared to the PECS I block.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PECS I Block

The PECS I block is a regional anesthesia technique performed preoperatively under ultrasound guidance. It involves the injection of 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscles to block the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. This procedure targets the right breast in the study to reduce postoperative pain and is compared to local anesthetic infiltration.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local Anesthetic Infiltration

Local anesthetic infiltration involves the intraoperative administration of 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under direct visualization into the pectoralis major muscle prior to muscle transection. This procedure targets the left breast in the study for pain management and is compared to the PECS I block.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female participants aged 18 to 59 years.
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I or II.
* Scheduled for primary breast augmentation surgery using a dual-plane or submuscular approach.
* Planned to receive silicone implants of identical volume and shape for both breasts.
* Able to provide written informed consent.
* Willing and able to comply with study procedures and follow-up assessments.

Exclusion Criteria

* Planned subglandular or subfascial breast augmentation.
* Undergoing revision breast surgery.
* History of breast disease, previous breast or axillary surgery, or breast cancer.
* Preoperative breast pain or chronic pain syndromes (e.g., fibromyalgia, chronic headaches, back pain, complex regional pain syndrome, neuropathic pain, osteoarthritis, or radicular pain).
* BIRADS score \> 3 based on imaging (ultrasound/mammography) within the past year.
* Allergy to medications used in the study (e.g., bupivacaine, propofol, fentanyl, sevoflurane, cefazolin, paracetamol, ondansetron, tramadol, or morphine HCl).
* Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders.
* Pregnant or at risk of pregnancy.
* Inability to provide informed consent or communication difficulties.
* Significant medical conditions that may interfere with the study outcomes.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

59 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yeditepe University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mert Ersan

Asst. Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mert Ersan, Asst.Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yeditepe University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yeditepe University Kozyatagi Hospital

Istanbul, Atasehir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-KAEK-21/1031

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

IPP-PSP Block vs. SPSIPB in Breast Surgery
NCT07246720 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA