Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided Lung Ventilation in Determining the Optimum Inspiratory Pressure in Pediatric Patients

NCT ID: NCT06188169

Last Updated: 2024-01-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-15

Study Completion Date

2023-08-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aimed to show the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided Lung Ventilation to determine the appropriate level of inspiratory pressure sufficient to provide adequate pulmonary ventilation with the resolution of the atelectatic lung.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Respiratory physiology is different in young children, especially in neonates and infants, from that of older children and adults. Neonates and infants have immature respiratory control, weak respiratory muscles, different airways, lung mechanics and higher basal metabolic oxygen requirements. Appreciating these distinctive respiratory characteristics in young children is necessary to formulate suitable anesthetic plans for the safe conduct of anesthesia as respiratory-related morbidity and mortality occur even in healthy children.

Atelectasis is a side effect of general anesthesia which can be found in all types of interventions and patients of all ages. The reported incidence of anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children varies from 12 to 42% in sedated and non-intubated patients and from 68 to 100% in children with general anesthesia with tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask.

Such lung collapse causes arterial blood oxygenation to decline during and after anesthesia. Although anesthesia-induced atelectasis resolves spontaneously in children with American Society of Anesthesiology's (ASA) physical status classification I to II after minor surgical procedures, this entity may persist in the postoperative period in high-risk children undergoing complex surgeries. In the latter population, atelectasis potentially increases the risk for ventilator-induced lung injury and could be associated with postoperative pulmonary complications.

Atelectasis and poorly ventilated lung areas appear during general anesthesia in adults as well as in children. It is of concern that collapsed lung tissue reduces lung compliance and causes venous admixture and arterial oxygenation impairment. Despite its high prevalence during anesthesia, bedside diagnosis of atelectasis remains challenging. Anesthesia-induced atelectasis is commonly small and thus mostly invisible on standard chest radiographs. In contrast, it can easily be diagnosed by tomographic imaging techniques such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, these latter are clinically impractical, expensive, time-consuming, and with harmful exposition to x-ray.

Sonography is a simple, non-invasive, and radiation-free methodology that has increased daily practice usage. Lung sonography (LUS) plays an important role in diagnosing pulmonary diseases in children, including obstructive and compressive atelectasis of different origins. Just as in adults, LUS could identify children needing a recruitment maneuver to re-expand their lungs and help optimize ventilator treatment during anesthesia. LUS could also identify critically ill children with a high risk for developing pulmonary complications due to residual atelectasis after surgery.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study in the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University showed that an inspiratory pressure of 12 cm H2O was sufficient to provide adequate ventilation with a lower occurrence of gastric insufflation during induction of general anesthesia in paralyzed Chinese children aged from 2 to 4 years old.

Many studies used LUS to determine the optimum positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), yet no previous studies used LUS to determine the best inspiratory pressure (IP) for pressure controlled ventilation. So, this study aimed to determine the appropriate level of inspiratory pressure sufficient to provide adequate pulmonary ventilation with the resolution of anesthesia-induced lung atelectasis using real-time ultrasonography in paralyzed children.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pediatric Lung Atelectasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a comparative prospective randomized controlled study.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
Patients will be randomly allocated by a computer-generated list into one of the study groups. The randomization sequence will be concealed in sealed envelopes and will be opened by an independent nurse.

Patients and data collectors will be blind to group assignments.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A = C-PCV received conventional pressure-controlled ventilation

Inspiratory pressure will be adjusted to achieve an expired tidal volume of 7 ml/Kg; the respiratory rate will be adjusted to achieve an end ETCO2 at 32-35 mmHg, inspiratory to expiratory ratio at 1:2, PEEP at 4 cm H2O, and FiO2 at 0.5. No further adjustment in IP will be made throughout the surgery. LUS will be performed at the same fixed four-time interval as Group-B. Anesthesiologist will not do any interventions to the atelectatic areas in this group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Increasing the inspiratory pressure if atelectasis detected by US

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The study used US to detect presence of lung atelectasis under mechanical ventilation in pediatrics. Inspiratory pressure increased gradually with continuous monitoring by lung US to minimize the atelectasis as possible.

Group B = US-PCV: received ultrasound-guided pressure-controlled ventilation

Initial IP will be ten cmH2O, PEEP 4 cmH2O with a 0.5 inspired oxygen fraction, and RR 12 breaths/min. Then under ultrasound guidance, a stepwise increase in inspiratory pressure from 10 cmH2O by 2 cmH2O increments every 5 min until the atelectasis disappeared on ultrasound (progression from lung collapse to B lines to normal lung image). The IP will be fixed at this level, and RR will be adjusted to maintain an EtCO2 at 32-35 mmHg. The maximum airway pressure will be limited to 35 cmH2O.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Increasing the inspiratory pressure if atelectasis detected by US

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The study used US to detect presence of lung atelectasis under mechanical ventilation in pediatrics. Inspiratory pressure increased gradually with continuous monitoring by lung US to minimize the atelectasis as possible.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Increasing the inspiratory pressure if atelectasis detected by US

The study used US to detect presence of lung atelectasis under mechanical ventilation in pediatrics. Inspiratory pressure increased gradually with continuous monitoring by lung US to minimize the atelectasis as possible.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children's age starting from 5 to 12 years.
* Genders eligible for the study: both sexes.
* ASA I-II.
* They were scheduled for elective Abdomino-pelvic surgery lasting \> 1.5 hours duration.

Exclusion Criteria

* Parent refusal
* Emergency cases
* Laparoscopic surgeries
* Acute respiratory disease, pulmonary or lung diseases
* Lung consolidation score ≥ 2 before intubation
* Morbid obesity
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Omnia Yahia El Sayed Kamel

Lecturer of anesthesiology and surgical ICU and pain management

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sherif Soaida, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Hany Mohammed, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Mohamed Mohamed, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Omnia Kamel, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Abul Rish Pediatric Hospital

Giza, الجيزة, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

US-guided Lung ventilation

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lung Recruitment and Postoperative CPAP
NCT02502279 COMPLETED PHASE2
Effects of End-inspiratory Pause on Ventilation
NCT06692634 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA