Validation and Reliability of the Turkish 4AT Scale for Post-Anesthesia Awakening Delirium
NCT ID: NCT06187389
Last Updated: 2024-01-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
188 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-03-01
2023-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aims: This study aimed to adapt the internationally recognized 4 AT Delirium Diagnosis Scale to Turkish and to evaluate the validity and reliability of this tool for the Turkish patient population.
Design: This study was structured and conducted at a state hospital from March to June 2023.
Methods: The study included 188 participants, determined through a power analysis. The 4AT Delirium Test and additional assessment tools were used to ascertain the delirium status of the patients. Comprehensive statistical evaluations were conducted using SPSS 25.0, which included analyses, such as item difficulty indices, item discrimination, and chi-square tests. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Non-Interventional Ethics Committee, ensured full compliance with the ethical standards set by the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided informed consent before participation. Additionally, our results strictly adhered to the guidelines of the STROBE Checklist.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Turkish Version of The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergency Delirium
NCT06931249
Effectiveness of Education Given to Patients With Hemodialysis Patients
NCT06534476
The Effect of Preoperative Nursing Visit on Anxiety and Pain Level of Patients After Surgery
NCT05169749
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Form of the Knowledge Assessment Scales for Dementia and Urinary Incontinence
NCT06758219
The Effect of Brochure-Based Education on Patients Planned for Nose Surgery
NCT05388799
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although a myriad of approaches and scales are employed to detect delirium, some may inadequately or erroneously define the condition. Overlooking delirium in its early stages increases healthcare expenses, extends hospitalization, burdens healthcare staff, and interrupts therapeutic plans \[3,10,11\]. Additionally, the importance of credible and efficient evaluation methods for delirium detection in postoperative recovery units has been underscored \[6\]. Both the Anesthesia Association and the European Anesthesia Association emphasize the significance of early delirium identification in these units \[12,13\]. Delirium onset in recovery units correlates with its emergence in general wards or intensive care units \[14\]. Thus, patients should not be discharged from the recovery units without undergoing a delirium assessment.
A comprehensive psychiatric evaluation remains a benchmark for diagnosing delirium. However, given the extensive training this method demands and its lengthy process \[15,16\] , there is a need for more streamlined and promptly applicable tests for routine delirium screening in postoperative recovery units. While many scales used for delirium assessment require specialized training and are time intensive \[17,18\], tools such as the delirium risk determination scale, confusion assessment method \[CAM\] \[19\], confusion assessment scale for the ICU \[CAM-ICU\] \[20\], 3D confusion assessment method \[3D-CAM\], delirium index \[DI\], and confusion assessment method importance \[CAM-S\] have gained acceptance. However, many of these tools are unwieldy \[9,17,18\]. In response, the 4 At Delirium screening scale \[4 AT\] was formulated for more rapid and dependable delirium screening \[21,22\].
The 4AT is a concise assessment tool, comprised of four items designed to evaluate delirium. Healthcare professionals can administer this test in less than 2 minutes, eliminating the need for specialized training \[21\]. The efficacy of 4AT has been validated in numerous studies involving various populations \[21,23,24\]. Despite its global recognition and adoption as a clinical instrument, there is a noticeable gap in research on its application within postoperative recovery units, or "awakening units," using the 4AT scale.
Screening for delirium, particularly following surgery, is crucial for timely identification because of its significant impact on long-term patient outcomes. Thus, there is an undeniable demand for reliable and streamlined assessment instruments. Many current tools require specialized knowledge and can be unwieldy in applications. A notable gap exists within Turkey's postoperative recovery setting for efficient and trustworthy delirium screening methods. Against this backdrop, our research aims to tailor the internationally recognized 4 AT Delirium Diagnosis Scale to the Turkish landscape and confirm its effectiveness. The primary objective of this study was to adapt the 4 AT Delirium Diagnosis Scale for Turkish use and ascertain its validity and reliability in a Turkish patient cohort. Within this framework, we address the following questions.
1. What is the validity of the 4 AT Delirium Test for the Turkish patient population?
2. What is the reliability of the 4 AT Delirium Test for the Turkish patient population?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
1 Grups
This methodological study was conducted using a cross-sectional observational approach at a leading teaching and research hospital. The study duration was from March to June 2023
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kilis 7 Aralik University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
İslam Elagöz
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
islam elagöz, MsC
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
kils 7 aralık University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Islam Elagöz
Kilis, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
kilis7aralıkU1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.