Comparing Effects of Fermented and Unfermented Pulses and Gut Microbiota

NCT ID: NCT06134076

Last Updated: 2025-01-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-30

Study Completion Date

2026-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the effects of consuming fermented pulses (certain types of legumes like chickpeas or lentils) in healthy people. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. How does consuming the fermented foods impact the gut microbiome?
2. Does this interaction between the fermented foods and the gut microbiome affect inflammation?

Participants will be asked to consume two sets of prepared meals, one containing unfermented pulses, the other containing fermented pulses.

Researchers will compare the gut microbiome and inflammation between these two diets.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The rationale for the research is that fermentation of pulses can reduce the concentration of compounds that suppress butyrate producing bacteria and butyrate production. This will in turn boost butyrate production during consumption of these fermented pulses relative to that in unfermented pulses. This in turn will lead to lower inflammation in people consuming fermented pulses. To best study this question the investigators will utilize a cross-over design trial where participants will consume daily meals containing either fermented or unfermented pulses (chickpeas), followed by a washout period and then a period of consuming the other type of pulse. The investigators hypothesize that those consuming the fermented pulses will experience a significant decrease in inflammatory markers driven by increased butyrate production by gut bacteria.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fermented Food Inflammation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

2 week run-in period with no pulse consumption. Randomly assigned to order of receiving interventions. Blood sample, fecal sample, dietary recall. 2 week intervention 1. Blood sample, fecal sample, dietary recall. 2 week washout. 2 week intervention 2. Blood sample, fecal sample, dietary recall.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Subjects will receive both interventions labeled only as 1 or 2. The study team assessing inflammation and microbiome will not know the identity of intervention 1 or 2. The preparer of the meals will also conduct dietary recall interviews with subjects and will know the identities of the interventions.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Unfermented Chickpea

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Unfermented chickpea

Intervention Type OTHER

Frozen meals containing 100 g unfermented chickpeas

Fermented Chickpea

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fermented chickpea

Intervention Type OTHER

Frozen meals containing 100 g fermented chickpeas

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Unfermented chickpea

Frozen meals containing 100 g unfermented chickpeas

Intervention Type OTHER

Fermented chickpea

Frozen meals containing 100 g fermented chickpeas

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy adults

Exclusion Criteria

* Taken antibiotics within the past month
* Taking any medication for the management of diabetes or obesity
* Are pregnant
* BMI \> 24.9
* Allergies to pulses or any other meal components
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Penn State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Darrell W. Cockburn, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Darrell Cockburn, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Penn State University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Darrell W Cockburn, PhD

Role: CONTACT

814-863-2950

Andy Paff, MS

Role: CONTACT

919-909-8392

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

58-3060-3-052

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

STUDY00023162

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pulse Biomarker Discovery
NCT04887584 COMPLETED NA
Oat Breakfast Satiety Study
NCT01372683 COMPLETED PHASE4
Dairy Products to Your Gut and Brain
NCT06311097 RECRUITING NA
Soy Nut Study on Markers of Health
NCT01173380 COMPLETED NA