Effect of Different Mobilization Techniques With Common Use of Interferential Therapy in Patients With Knee OA

NCT ID: NCT06025929

Last Updated: 2023-09-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-10

Study Completion Date

2017-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aimed to determine the effects of different manual mobilization techniques on pain, muscle strength, and functional limitations in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (Knee OA). A double-blinded pretest-posttest experimental study. This research employed a two-arm parallel group randomized comparative design. A total of thirty participants diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned and equally divided into groups 1 and 2, each containing 15 participants. Both Group 1 and Group 2 underwent Maitland and Mulligan mobilization techniques, alongside a common Interferential therapy (IFT) regimen, over the course of three sessions per week for a duration of four weeks. The assessment of pain and functional disability outcomes was conducted through the application of The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at the baseline and four weeks following the intervention. To determine the effects of the intervention within and between the groups, the outcome scores were subjected to analysis using both dependent and independent t-tests.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent disorder with significant global health implications, its prevalence varying across populations due to intricate factors. Recent investigations highlight an age-related increase in knee OA prevalence, particularly impacting those aged 60 and above, with projections indicating heightened impact due to aging demographics. Recent pathogenesis studies illuminate the intricate molecular and cellular processes underlying knee osteoarthritis (OA), encompassing cartilage degradation, subchondral bone changes, and inflammation.Recent advancements have expanded knee osteoarthritis (OA) management, including medical, surgical, and physiotherapy interventions. Pharmacological treatments such as analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs) remain fundamental for pain alleviation and inflammation reduction. Intra-articular therapies like corticosteroid injections and hyaluronic acid supplements offer localized relief and potential disease-modifying effects.Surgical interventions like total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provide pain relief and improved function for end-stage OA. Minimally invasive techniques like partial knee replacements and patient-specific implants aim to preserve joint function and enhance outcomes. Physiotherapy and rehabilitation are crucial, in improving stability, muscle strength, and mobility. Studies highlight tailored exercises, neuromuscular training, and proprioceptive exercises in managing OA symptoms. The integration of these approaches underscores comprehensive knee OA management, addressing pain, function, and quality of life. The outcomes of this study could offer evidence-based recommendations for clinicians, aiding them in selecting the most appropriate manual therapy approach to alleviate pain, enhance joint mobility, and improve functional capacity in knee OA patients. Ultimately, this research seeks to contribute to the optimization of knee OA management strategies, improving the well-being of those affected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Maitland Group

Maitland Group received Maitland's mobilization techninque in addition to an intereferential therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Maitland's mobilization technique

Intervention Type OTHER

Maitland's mobilization technique was performed on the patients with its all components, such as 1. Distraction 2. Anteroposterior glides 3. Posteroanterior glides 4. Medial glides and 5. Lateral glides.

Interferential Therapy (IFT)

Intervention Type OTHER

Interferential Therapy was performed on the patients with the following parameters: career frequency 4000Hz; waveform: rectangular; sweep time: 1 second rise and fall and 5 second stay; Treatment duration: 10 minutes; sweep frequency: 10 to 130 Hz. The current intensity was adjusted until the subject reported feeling a strong tingling sensation without causing muscle contraction. A aquatic gel was applied before straping the electopads over treatment area for smooth electrical conduction.

Mulligan Group

Mulligan Group received Mulligan's mobilization techninque in addition to an intereferential therapy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mulligan's mobilization techniques

Intervention Type OTHER

Mulligan's mobilization technique was performed on the patients with its all components using a therapeutic belt, such as 1. Medial mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee flexion 2. Medial mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee extension 3. Lateral mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee flexion 4. Lateral mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee extension.

Interferential Therapy (IFT)

Intervention Type OTHER

Interferential Therapy was performed on the patients with the following parameters: career frequency 4000Hz; waveform: rectangular; sweep time: 1 second rise and fall and 5 second stay; Treatment duration: 10 minutes; sweep frequency: 10 to 130 Hz. The current intensity was adjusted until the subject reported feeling a strong tingling sensation without causing muscle contraction. A aquatic gel was applied before straping the electopads over treatment area for smooth electrical conduction.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Maitland's mobilization technique

Maitland's mobilization technique was performed on the patients with its all components, such as 1. Distraction 2. Anteroposterior glides 3. Posteroanterior glides 4. Medial glides and 5. Lateral glides.

Intervention Type OTHER

Mulligan's mobilization techniques

Mulligan's mobilization technique was performed on the patients with its all components using a therapeutic belt, such as 1. Medial mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee flexion 2. Medial mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee extension 3. Lateral mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee flexion 4. Lateral mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee extension.

Intervention Type OTHER

Interferential Therapy (IFT)

Interferential Therapy was performed on the patients with the following parameters: career frequency 4000Hz; waveform: rectangular; sweep time: 1 second rise and fall and 5 second stay; Treatment duration: 10 minutes; sweep frequency: 10 to 130 Hz. The current intensity was adjusted until the subject reported feeling a strong tingling sensation without causing muscle contraction. A aquatic gel was applied before straping the electopads over treatment area for smooth electrical conduction.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Sub-acute or chronic osteoarthritis of knee.
* Age between 45-65 years.
* Gender Male and female.
* Subjects willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of R.A, polyarthritis or systemic inflammatory arthropathies.
* History of total knee arthroplasty or major knee trauma injury.
* Fracture of lower limb within the past 6 months.
* Hip or ankle instability, excessive weakness, surgery or major trauma injury.
* Intra-articular steroid injection in knee joint within 3 months.
* Cognitive problems.
* Patient with severe cardiac or pulmonary disorders.
* Peripheral vascular disease.
* Tumour/malignancies/infections.
* Metallic implants in the lower limbs.
* Any severe deformity around the knee joint.
* Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) system47: up to grade 0-III.
* History of neurological and psychological disorders.
* High risk health status- e.g.- uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, angina type pain, nocturnal dyspnoea, shortness of breathing, tachycardia etc.
* Contraindications of IFT and mobilization.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Burdwan Institute of Medical and Life Sciences (BIMLS)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

King Saud University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

AMIR IQBAL

Prinicipal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

AMIR IQBAL, MPT

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

King Saud University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of applied Medical Science, King Saud University

Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BIMLS/67/2017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.