Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-29
2023-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Do health outcomes differ between participants who use a DIY PAC and those who use a sham air cleaner?
* How effective is the DIY air cleaner in reducing indoor concentrations of fine particles (PM2.5), and volatile organic compounds found in wildfire smoke? OR How effective is the DIY air cleaner in reducing indoor concentrations of fine and coarse particles (i.e., PM 10)?
* What are barriers to use of a DIY air cleaner and what factors facilitate its use?
Participants will be asked to do the following:
* Participate in 5 home visits from study staff between July - October 2023
* Have an air quality sensor placed in the participant's bedroom for the whole study period
* Have a small sensor attached to the main door of the participant's house to record when the door is open or closed (important for air quality inside)
* Allow researchers to take air and dust samples in the participant's bedroom
* Run a DIY air cleaner in the participant's bedroom for at least 6 nights while the participant sleeps
* Complete 2 interviews
* Allow study staff to collect 3 fingerstick blood samples
* Allow study staff to collect 3 samples of fluid from inside the nose
* Use the study air cleaner in the participant's bedroom during the study period
The investigators will measure air quality in participating homes and measure health outcomes for participants. The investigators will compare outcomes of participants who use a DIY air cleaner with filters that work well to those of participants who use a DIY air cleaner with a placebo filter (one that does not work well to remove the air pollutants of concern). The goal of the study is to see if using the effective air cleaner leads to better health outcomes and indoor air quality.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of HEPA Air Filters on Subclinical Markers of Cardiovascular Health
NCT01256957
Using Indoor Air Filtration to Slow Atherothrombosis Progression in Adults With Ischemic Heart Disease History
NCT05867381
Cardiovascular Effects of Aerosols in Residences Study
NCT01570062
Cardiovascular Effects of Exposure to Wood Smoke in Healthy Human Adults
NCT04297761
Cleaner Air for Better Cardiac Biomarkers
NCT05379400
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Evidence of whether PAC use is associated with health benefits is mixed. In addition, commercially-available PACs can be expensive and hard to access. An affordable alternative that gained attention during the COVID-19 pandemic is a Do-It-Yourself (DIY) PAC, made from a box fan and high efficiency filter(s). Laboratory studies have shown DIY PACs to have excellent clean air delivery rates (CADR, a measure of effectiveness) with respect to fine particulate matter. However, their evidence in real-world settings is limited. Researchers have acknowledged that behaviors, such as turning on/off the fans, could have major impacts on efficacy.
The current study aims to examine the effect of PACs on indoor air quality and health during wildfire smoke exposure. The investigators will conduct this research in an agricultural community in central California that has experienced wildfire smoke exposure and routinely experiences dust. According to local partners, most residents of this county do not already own PACs. One risk of planning a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) of wildfire smoke exposure is that wildfire smoke will not occur. For this reason, the investigators selected a community with historically elevated levels of particle pollution (PM2.5, PM10, dust) in the fall and winter months as the study site. If wildfire smoke exposure does not occur during the study period, the efficacy of the DIY PACs on indoor air quality and health will be tested during periods of dust/high particle pollution exposure (anticipated October 2023).
Up to 120 recruited and consented study participants will be randomly divided into 2 groups. One group will use an effective DIY air cleaner (intervention); the other group will use a sham DIY air cleaner (control). All groups will have the same basic exposure to ambient air pollution.
Qualified participants will agree to have air quality sensors and door monitors placed in their home (bedroom and main exterior door). Air quality will be measured continuously during the study period. Other study activities will occur intermittently, during 5 visits by study staff to the participant's home. These activities will include completing 2 symptom and demographic questionnaires, collecting air and dust samples from inside the homes and collecting biological samples at 3 visits (capillary blood (by fingerstick) and nasal epithelial lining fluid). Blood and nasal fluid collected will be assessed for markers of inflammation and immune system activation. The investigators hypothesize that subjects in the intervention group will have reduced concentrations of measured air pollutants in their indoor air samples and lower levels of markers of inflammation compared to those in the control group. The investigators further hypothesize that symptoms, particularly related to respiratory inflammation, will differ between intervention (air filtration) and control (sham filtration) groups. Baseline measurements and post-intervention period measurements will be compared for intra-individual change and differences between study groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention arm
Subjects in the treatment arm will use a DIY portable air cleaner made by attaching a highly effective furnace filter (MERV 13) and carbon absorbent to a box fan.
DIY portable air cleaner with a highly effective filter
A portable air filtration device that can be homemade ("DIY"), constructed by attaching a highly effective air filter (MERV13 rating or higher) to a 20 inch box fan to filter air pollutants including particulate matter of size 2.5 micrometers diameter or greater.
Control arm
Subjects in the control arm will use a DIY portable air cleaner with a sham filter. All subjects will receive education on air quality, wildfire smoke, and health.
DIY portable air cleaner with sham filtration
A portable air filtration device that can be homemade ("DIY") by attaching an air filter to a 20 inch box fan. The portable air cleaner with sham filtration with have a filter that is not effective for filtration of fine particulate matter, including that in wildfire smoke.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DIY portable air cleaner with a highly effective filter
A portable air filtration device that can be homemade ("DIY"), constructed by attaching a highly effective air filter (MERV13 rating or higher) to a 20 inch box fan to filter air pollutants including particulate matter of size 2.5 micrometers diameter or greater.
DIY portable air cleaner with sham filtration
A portable air filtration device that can be homemade ("DIY") by attaching an air filter to a 20 inch box fan. The portable air cleaner with sham filtration with have a filter that is not effective for filtration of fine particulate matter, including that in wildfire smoke.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Has access to telephone and/or the internet for study communication
* Is a resident of Tulare County, California
* Is proficient in English or Spanish for study communication
Exclusion Criteria
* Plans to move before November 2023
* Regularly travels or sleeps away from home (e.g., once a week or more)
* Already owns and uses a portable air cleaner
* Lives in a multi-unit home with a shared central HVAC system
* Has a bleeding disorder, such as hemophilia (taking a blood thinning medication does not exclude)
* Takes any of the following anti-inflammatory medications regularly: abatacept (Orencia), adalimumab(Humira), anakinra (Kineret), anifrolumab (Saphnelo), apremilast (Otezla), azathioprine (Imuran),certolizumab pegol (Cimzia), etanercept (Enbrel), golimumab (Simponi Aria), hydroxychloroquine(Plaquenil), infliximab (Remicade), ixekizumab (Taltz), leflunomide (Arava), methotrexate(Rheumatrex, Trexall), prednisone (Deltasone), sulfasalazine (Azulfidine), rituximab (Rituxan,MabThera), sarilumab (Kevzara), tocilizumab (Actemra)
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ann Chelminski
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ann N Chelminski, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Nayamin Martinez, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Central California Environmental Justice Network
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Central California Environmental Justice Network
Fresno, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cascio WE. Wildland fire smoke and human health. Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 15;624:586-595. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Create a Clean Room to Protect Indoor Air Quality During a Wildfire. 2022; https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/create-clean-room-protect-indoor-air-quality-during-wildfire. Accessed September 30, 2022.
Cheek E, Guercio V, Shrubsole C, Dimitroulopoulou S. Portable air purification: Review of impacts on indoor air quality and health. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 20;766:142585. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142585. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4. Program CTAQ. Box fan filter, a DIY users guide. 2022; https://www.cct-enr.com/box-fan-filter. Accessed September 16, 2022.
5. Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. DIY Air Filter. https://pscleanair.gov/525/DIY-Air-Filter. Accessed September 16, 2022.
Srikrishna D. Can 10x cheaper, lower-efficiency particulate air filters and box fans complement High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) purifiers to help control the COVID-19 pandemic? Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 1):155884. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155884. Epub 2022 May 14.
Holder AL, Halliday HS, Virtaranta L. Impact of do-it-yourself air cleaner design on the reduction of simulated wildfire smoke in a controlled chamber environment. Indoor Air. 2022 Nov;32(11):e13163. doi: 10.1111/ina.13163.
Batterman S, Du L, Mentz G, Mukherjee B, Parker E, Godwin C, Chin JY, O'Toole A, Robins T, Rowe Z, Lewis T. Particulate matter concentrations in residences: an intervention study evaluating stand-alone filters and air conditioners. Indoor Air. 2012 Jun;22(3):235-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00761.x. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Create a clean room to protect indoor air quality during a wildfire
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
23-0965
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.