Effects of Sequential Exposure to Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone in Healthy Adult Human Volunteers.
NCT ID: NCT02133586
Last Updated: 2020-08-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exposure to Ozone and Diesel Exhaust
NCT01874834
Interaction Effects of Temperature and Ozone
NCT01981135
Epigenetic Effect Modifications With Ozone Exposure on Healthy Volunteers
NCT02469428
Responses to Exposure to Low Levels of Concentrated Ambient Particles in Healthy Young Adults
NCT03232086
The Effect of Low Level Ozone Exposure on Healthy Volunteers
NCT00468221
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To define multi-pollutant exposures that are relevant to real world scenarios we consulted experts in the EPA Office of Air and Radiation (OAR), who advised us to study the effects of sequential exposure to NO2 and O3, two ubiquitous NAAQS criteria pollutants. Ambient diurnal profiles of these two pollutants indicate that levels of NO2 often peak in the evening and morning hours, which are followed by peak ambient O3 concentrations during mid-day. Using this information we designed the study described here to determine whether sequential exposure to NO2 and O3, or O3 and NO2, will result in greater pulmonary and cardiovascular effects than exposure to either pollutant alone. Ozone is a major component of photochemical smog and is one of the most thoroughly studied gaseous pollutants. Controlled human exposure studies have been critical in demonstrating that it can cause airway inflammation, including increases in neutrophil infiltration into the lung and the production of pro-inflammatory mediators, and ultimately decrements in lung function. More recent studies have shown that ozone can also increase vascular inflammation, as well as alter autonomic nervous system control of heart rate. Nitrogen dioxide is an oxidant that is produced by natural and anthropogenic processes. The majority of man-made NO2 results from large-scale combustion-related processes, such as automobile emissions and the generation of electricity. Although traffic-related exposures account for the majority of NO2 emissions. Emissions from natural gas cooking appliances and kerosene-fueled space heaters with inadequate ventilation can serve as a significant source of human exposure to NO2 indoors. Previous studies have shown that NO2 concentrations can reach 600ppb in the area surrounding an operating gas stove, and peak levels may exceed 2000ppb. Controlled human exposure studies have indicated that exposure to NO2 alone (ranging from 110-2000ppb) results in little to no observable decrement in lung function; however, NO2 exposure has been associated with increases in airway hyper-responsiveness, susceptibility to pulmonary infection, and increased pulmonary inflammation. More recently, exposure to 500ppb NO2 has been associated with changes in cardiac electrophysiology. Recent epidemiological data indicate that exposure to NO2 from vehicle emissions were associated with both respiratory and cardiovascular-related mortality. Previous studies have shown that sequential exposure to NO2 and O3 (at concentrations similar to those proposed in this study) results in greater lung function decrements and increased non-specific airway responsiveness compared to O3 exposure preceded by clean air exposure in young women. Additional studies have demonstrated that sequential exposure to ozone, separated by 24 hours, resulted in greater lung function decrements, assessed as forced expiratory volume in the first second of exhalation (FEV1), following the second exposure than was observed after the first. Ozone exposure has also been shown to have a priming effect for subsequent exposure to sulfur dioxide (SO2) in adolescent asthmatics and allergen-induced responses of perennially allergic asthmatics. Additionally, ongoing research at the EPA Human Studies Facility has demonstrated that sequential exposure of humans to diesel exhaust and ozone can result in greater lung function decrement than exposure to either pollutant alone. Given the complex nature of pollutant exposure, we are interested in determining if exposure to one pollutant can sensitize a person so that subsequent exposure to a second pollutant would cause a more pronounced response than would be expected based on exposure to just the second pollutant alone. Thus, in this study we will examine two exposure scenarios involving sequential exposures of NO2 and O3. The first involves determining whether an initial exposure to NO2 will "prime" an individual to a subsequent O3 exposure. The second involves determining whether an initial exposure to O3, at a concentration that results in small cardiopulmonary changes that resolve within 24 hours, will augment a subsequent exposure to NO2. Generally speaking, exposure to NO2 alone is not associated with robust changes in metrics of cardiopulmonary function; however, we believe that it can modify, and be modified by, ozone exposure. Specifically, this study will test two general hypotheses. First, we hypothesize that pre-exposure to a relatively low concentration of NO2 will "sensitize" individuals to a subsequent O3 exposure and lead to greater changes in cardiopulmonary function compared to O3 exposure preceded by clean air exposure. Second, we hypothesize that pre-exposure to O3, at a concentration that has been previously associated with small changes in cardiopulmonary function, will prime individuals to have a greater response to NO2 compared to pre-exposure to clean air. The information obtained during the course of this study will enable the EPA to better evaluate the risks associated with sequential multi-pollutant exposure and potentially provide advice on activities to mitigate the effects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Clean Air - O3
Day #1: Two-hour exposure to clean, filtered air with intermittent exercise. Day #2: Two-hour exposure to 300ppb ozone (beginning approximately 22 hours after completion of the Day #1 exposure) with intermittent exercise.
Day #3: Follow-up (no exposure)
Ozone
Exposure to 300ppb ozone with intermittent exercise as either the first exposure in a two-exposure series or as the second exposure approximately 22 hours after the first exposure (either clean air or nitrogen dioxide) in a two-exposure series.
NO2-O3
Day #1: Two-hour exposure to 500ppb nitrogen dioxide with intermittent exercise.
Day #2: Two-hour exposure to 300ppb ozone (beginning approximately 22 hours after completion of the Day #1 exposure) with intermittent exercise.
Day #3: Follow-up (no exposure)
Ozone
Exposure to 300ppb ozone with intermittent exercise as either the first exposure in a two-exposure series or as the second exposure approximately 22 hours after the first exposure (either clean air or nitrogen dioxide) in a two-exposure series.
Nitrogen dioxide
Exposure to 500ppb nitrogen dioxide with intermittent exercise as either the first exposure in a two-exposure series or as the second exposure approximately 22 hours after the first exposure (either clean air or ozone) in a two-exposure series.
Clean Air - NO2
Day #1: Two-hour exposure to clean, filtered air with intermittent exercise. Day #2: Two-hour exposure to 500ppb nitrogen dioxide (beginning approximately 22 hours after completion of the Day #1 exposure) with intermittent exercise.
Day #3: Follow-up (no exposure)
Nitrogen dioxide
Exposure to 500ppb nitrogen dioxide with intermittent exercise as either the first exposure in a two-exposure series or as the second exposure approximately 22 hours after the first exposure (either clean air or ozone) in a two-exposure series.
O3 - NO2
Day #1: Two-hour exposure to 300ppb ozone with intermittent exercise. Day #2: Two-hour exposure to 500ppb nitrogen dioxide (beginning approximately 22 hours after completion of the Day #1 exposure) with intermittent exercise.
Day #3: Follow-up (no exposure)
Ozone
Exposure to 300ppb ozone with intermittent exercise as either the first exposure in a two-exposure series or as the second exposure approximately 22 hours after the first exposure (either clean air or nitrogen dioxide) in a two-exposure series.
Nitrogen dioxide
Exposure to 500ppb nitrogen dioxide with intermittent exercise as either the first exposure in a two-exposure series or as the second exposure approximately 22 hours after the first exposure (either clean air or ozone) in a two-exposure series.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ozone
Exposure to 300ppb ozone with intermittent exercise as either the first exposure in a two-exposure series or as the second exposure approximately 22 hours after the first exposure (either clean air or nitrogen dioxide) in a two-exposure series.
Nitrogen dioxide
Exposure to 500ppb nitrogen dioxide with intermittent exercise as either the first exposure in a two-exposure series or as the second exposure approximately 22 hours after the first exposure (either clean air or ozone) in a two-exposure series.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Physical conditioning allowing intermittent, moderate exercise for two hours.
3. Ability to complete the exposure exercise regimen without reaching 80% of predicted maximal heart rate.
4. Normal baseline 12-lead baseline EKG or if not normal the EKG must be approved by a study cardiologist.
5. Normal lung function
1. Forced vital capacity (FVC) \>75% of that predicted for gender, ethnicity, age, and height (according to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey \[NHANESIII\] guidelines).
2. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) \> 75% of that predicted for gender, ethnicity, age, and height (according to NHANESIII guidelines).
3. FEV1/FVC ration \>75% of predicted values (according to NHANESIII guidelines).
6. Oxygen saturation \>96% on room air.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Individuals with a Framingham risk score (Hard Coronary Heard Disease \[HCHD\] 10-year risk) ≥10.
3. Individuals with asthma or a history of asthma.
4. Individuals who are allergic to chemical vapors or gases.
5. Females who are pregnant, attempting to become pregnant, or breastfeeding.
6. Individuals that are unwilling or unable to stop taking vitamin C or E, or medications that may impact the results of ozone challenge such at least two weeks prior to the study and for the duration of the study. Medications not specifically mentioned here may be reviewed by the investigators prior to an individual's inclusion in the study.
7. Individuals who have smoked tobacco during the last five years or those with a history of \>5 pack years.
8. Individuals living with a smoker who smokes inside the house.
9. Individuals with a body mass index (BMI) \>30 or \<18. Body mass index is calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms by the square of the height in meters.
10. Individuals with occupational exposures to high levels of vapors, dust, gases, or fumes on an on-going basis.
11. Individuals with uncontrolled hypertension (≥150 systolic or ≥90 diastolic).
12. Individuals that do not understand or speak English.
13. Individuals that are unable to perform the exercise required for the study.
14. Individuals that are taking beta blocker medications.
15. Individuals with a history of skin allergies to adhesives used in securing EKG electrodes.
16. Individuals with unspecified diseases, conditions, or medications that might influence the responses to the exposures, as judged by the medical staff.
17. Individuals that are unwilling or unable to stop taking over-the-counter pain medications such as aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin), naproxen (Aleve), or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory ("NSAID") medications for 48 hours prior to the exposures and post-exposure visits.
18. Individuals that are taking systemic steroids or beta-blocker medications.
19. Individuals with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level \> 6.4%.
1. Individuals with active seasonal allergies during the time of participation in the study.
2. Individuals suffering from acute respiratory illness within four weeks prior to any of the study exposure series.
3. Individuals that have been exposed to smoke and fumes within 24 hours of any study visit.
4. Individuals that have consumed alcohol within 24 hours of any study visit.
5. Individuals that have engaged in strenuous exercise within 24 hours of any study visit.
6. Individuals that have been exposed to ozone-based home air purifiers within 24 hours of any study visit.
7. Individuals that have been exposed to unvented household combustion sources (gas stoves, lit fireplaces, oil/kerosene heaters) within 48 hours of any study visit.
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Shaun D. McCullough
Research Biologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shaun McCullough, M.S., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
E.P.A. Human Studies Facility
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ENDZONE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.