Assessment of Sensory Block During Labour Epidural Analgesia in Patients Experiencing Pain During First Stage of Labour.
NCT ID: NCT05881395
Last Updated: 2024-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-06-16
2023-12-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Prior studies have documented two thresholds of sensory block to both ice and pinprick: one defined as the lower sensory block level (LSBL) where the patient is able to notice a cold or sharp sensation but perceives that is not as sharp or cold as a control area and the other the upper sensory block level (USBL) where the patient perceives the cold or sharp sensation is at the same temperature or sharpness as the control area.
The goal of this study is to contribute to the standardization of the assessment of sensory block levels during labour epidural analgesia by studying patients with labour epidurals who are experiencing pain and determining the LSBL and USBL and how these change as the patients become comfortable following the administration of manual epidural top ups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Differential Sensory Block During Labor Epidural Analgesia: a Prospective Observational Study to Investigate the Relationship of Lower and Upper Sensory Block Levels to Cold With Sensory Block to Pinprick and Light Touch
NCT05187962
Identification of the Sensory Level Block to Cold During Epidural Analgesia for Labor: A Cohort Study to Determine the Influence of the Direction of Testing
NCT03572439
Ultrasound-Guided Technique for Thoracic Epidural Insertion
NCT01449214
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Pain Relief During the Active Phase of Labor
NCT01600495
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Labor Pain Control
NCT04894539
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators hypothesize that the LSBL to either cold or pinprick would be below dermatome T10 in patients receiving labour epidural analgesia during first stage of labour and who are experiencing pain. The investigators also hypothesize that upon receiving a top-up and re-establishment of effective analgesia, (a) the LSBL would be at or above dermatome T10 or (b) USBL would increase to T10 or above T10 if USBL was below T10 before receiving a top-up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Women with epidural analgesia experiencing pain during labor
Patients reporting pain will have their sensory block checked using ice and pinprick tests, prior to, and following and epidural top-up.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients admitted to labour and delivery unit at Mount Sinai Hospital in their first stage of labour
* Patients who have a labour epidural that has been initiated as an epidural, CSE (combined spinal epidural) or a dural puncture epidural (DPE).
* Patients who are experiencing pain, defined as Visual Numerical Rating Score of more than 1/10, despite our institution's standard epidural Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus maintenance regimen and request a manual epidural top-up for the first time
* Have capacity to consent to the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with medical conditions that would compromise sensitivity to cold or pinprick assessments
* patients who sustained unintentional dural puncture, those requiring change in our standard epidural maintenance regimen or those who have had a failed epidural requiring replacement.
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jose Carvalho, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kordich L, Ghiringhelli JP, George RB, Downey K, Ye XY, Carvalho J. Characterizing patterns of sensory loss during labor epidural analgesia: a prospective study of breakthrough pain. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2025 Aug 12;64:104753. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104753. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
23-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.