Assessment of Sensory Block During Labour Epidural Analgesia in Patients Experiencing Pain During First Stage of Labour.

NCT ID: NCT05881395

Last Updated: 2024-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-16

Study Completion Date

2023-12-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for pain control during labour and an essential component of delivering effective and safe epidural analgesia is the assessment of the epidural sensory block. There is significant literature on the assessment of sensory block during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section but limited studies exploring the assessment of sensory blockade in labour analgesia.

Prior studies have documented two thresholds of sensory block to both ice and pinprick: one defined as the lower sensory block level (LSBL) where the patient is able to notice a cold or sharp sensation but perceives that is not as sharp or cold as a control area and the other the upper sensory block level (USBL) where the patient perceives the cold or sharp sensation is at the same temperature or sharpness as the control area.

The goal of this study is to contribute to the standardization of the assessment of sensory block levels during labour epidural analgesia by studying patients with labour epidurals who are experiencing pain and determining the LSBL and USBL and how these change as the patients become comfortable following the administration of manual epidural top ups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The pain pathways involved in the process of labour and delivery have been well established. Nociceptive stimuli during first stage of labour are transmitted via the T10 to L1 posterior nerve root ganglia, while the nociceptive stimuli during second stage of labour are transmitted via the L1 and S2 to S4 (pudendal nerve) posterior nerve root ganglia. Although these pain pathways are well established, there is no information in the literature as to what level or depth of sensory block, assessed by current clinical practices, is required for effective labour analgesia. This information is critical for planning and safety of epidural analgesia during labour.

The investigators hypothesize that the LSBL to either cold or pinprick would be below dermatome T10 in patients receiving labour epidural analgesia during first stage of labour and who are experiencing pain. The investigators also hypothesize that upon receiving a top-up and re-establishment of effective analgesia, (a) the LSBL would be at or above dermatome T10 or (b) USBL would increase to T10 or above T10 if USBL was below T10 before receiving a top-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labor Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Women with epidural analgesia experiencing pain during labor

Patients reporting pain will have their sensory block checked using ice and pinprick tests, prior to, and following and epidural top-up.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Physical Status Classification II or III
* Patients admitted to labour and delivery unit at Mount Sinai Hospital in their first stage of labour
* Patients who have a labour epidural that has been initiated as an epidural, CSE (combined spinal epidural) or a dural puncture epidural (DPE).
* Patients who are experiencing pain, defined as Visual Numerical Rating Score of more than 1/10, despite our institution's standard epidural Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus maintenance regimen and request a manual epidural top-up for the first time
* Have capacity to consent to the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a language barrier that may interfere with accurate response to sensory block assessment
* Patients with medical conditions that would compromise sensitivity to cold or pinprick assessments
* patients who sustained unintentional dural puncture, those requiring change in our standard epidural maintenance regimen or those who have had a failed epidural requiring replacement.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jose Carvalho, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kordich L, Ghiringhelli JP, George RB, Downey K, Ye XY, Carvalho J. Characterizing patterns of sensory loss during labor epidural analgesia: a prospective study of breakthrough pain. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2025 Aug 12;64:104753. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104753. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40876244 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

23-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.