Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia: Pre-procedure Versus Real-time Scan

NCT ID: NCT03805958

Last Updated: 2019-09-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-15

Study Completion Date

2020-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators will compare the success rate, the consumed time, the number of needle passing, the depth and angle of the needle, the anesthetic effect, complications, pain and patient's satisfaction between 'Real-time scan' and 'Pre-procedure scan', when we performing spinal/epidural combined anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traditionally, spinal/epidural combined anesthesia has been performed by palpation of the landmark like Tuffier's line. There are some studies that using ultrasound improves the success rate to regional anesthesia. There are two methods of using ultrasonography, 'Real-time scan' and 'Pre-procedure scan'. Direct comparison of these two methods is not yet studied. So investigators will compare the success rate, the consumed time, the number of needle passing, the depth and angle of the needle, the anesthetic effect, complications, pain and patient's satisfaction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Regional Anesthesia Morbidity Ultrasonography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pre-procedure

Confirmed landmark by ultrasound scan before procedure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

prescan ultrasonography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Applying realtime ultrasound before the combined anesthesia

Real time

Confirmed landmark by ultrasound scan during procedure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

realtime ultrasonography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Applying realtime ultrasound during the combined anesthesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

realtime ultrasonography

Applying realtime ultrasound during the combined anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

prescan ultrasonography

Applying realtime ultrasound before the combined anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Spinal/Epidural combined anesthesia is required.

Exclusion Criteria

* Skin infection or trauma
* Abnormal coagulation lab
* History of spine surgery
* Pregnancy
* Abnormal structure of spine
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tae Kyong Kim

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tae Kyong Kim, Kim

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

SMG-SNU Boramae hospital

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tae Kyong Kim, MD, phD

Role: CONTACT

+82-2-870-2519

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging facilitates localization of the epidural space during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):64-7. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.19633. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11172514 (View on PubMed)

Kil HK, Cho JE, Kim WO, Koo BN, Han SW, Kim JY. Prepuncture ultrasound-measured distance: an accurate reflection of epidural depth in infants and small children. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;32(2):102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.10.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17350519 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

30-2018-81

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ultrasound Identification Automation Study
NCT03535155 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING