Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique
NCT ID: NCT02271100
Last Updated: 2025-10-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-10-25
2025-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1\. How does the traditional technique based on palpation compare to one using ultrasound to place an epidural catheter? 2. Does ultrasound reduce one potential risk in epidural placement?
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Three-Dimensional Ultrasound (3D US) in Parturients
NCT01523249
The Use of Ultrasound to Measure Depth of Thoracic Epidural Space
NCT01172730
Ultrasound Determination of Needle Depth in Epidurals in Adult Patients
NCT00981916
The Effect of Ultrasound Real-time Guidance Technique on the Effectiveness and Safety of Labor Analgesia
NCT06300151
Handheld Ultrasound-assisted Versus Palpation-guided Labor Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia
NCT04759547
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. A prospective, randomized, blinded comparison of ultrasound imaging versus palpation for epidural catheter insertion in laboring women.
2. A prospective, single cohort, blinded trial to assess whether ultrasound imaging provides a reliable placement below the L3 vertebra.
The initial phase of the investigation will be a randomized comparison of ultrasound versus palpation. Patients will be enrolled in early labor and will be randomized to have their epidural placed with either technique. The technique will be chosen by computer-generated randomization list maintained in opaque sequentially numbered envelopes. Description of the placement technique is below. The primary outcome will be the number of epidural catheters inserted above the intended insertion site. The investigators will also assess the total time required for epidural catheter placement, number of attempts for successful insertion, effectiveness of the epidural catheter for labor pain control.
Following completion of enrollment of the first phase, the second phase of the investigation will enroll patients only into the single-cohort ultrasound arm. The study will use the same methodology as the initial phase, but without randomization due to a single cohort. The primary outcome will be the absolute number of epidural catheters inserted above the L3 vertebral body. The investigators will also assess the effectiveness of the ultrasound markings for guiding placement.
Procedure placement technique After written, informed consent, and standard patient preparation, the epidural catheter will be placed with the patient in the sitting position by a junior resident. In the ultrasound arm, the patient will be first imaged using an appropriate probe, and the identified ultrasound landmarks marked on the skin. The skin will be prepped in the usual fashion, and the needle will be inserted at the identified site and direction determined by ultrasound. In the palpation arm, the skin will be prepped and the needle will be inserted using palpation-identified landmarks to guide the needle. All catheters will be intended to be placed at the L4-L5 interspace as the primary attempt. The L3-L4 interspace will be used as a secondary attempt.
Assessment of final position After insertion of the epidural catheter and administration of the pain relief medication, patients in both groups will be examined by a blinded observer using ultrasound to determine the catheter insertion site and the likely insertion interspace.
If, however, the investigators discover that the use of ultrasound for placement of the epidural catheter may present greater risk than previously anticipated to the pregnant woman or fetus, then the investigators will stop the study after phase 1 and not proceed with phase 2.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
palpation guidance
placement of spinal or combined spinal epidural needle using palpation to guide entry position
palpation guidance
use of palpation for position estimation
ultrasound guidance
placement of spinal or combined spinal epidural using ultrasound to guide entry position
ultrasound guidance
use of ultrasound for entry position estimation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ultrasound guidance
use of ultrasound for entry position estimation
palpation guidance
use of palpation for position estimation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Will be receiving neuraxial placement for labor, having been consented for the procedure
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to participate in the study due to severe pain
* Contraindications to neuraxial analgesia
* Previous spinal surgery in the lumbar or sacral area (L1 through Sacrum)
* BMI greater than 37
* Height less than 60 inches
* Significant scoliosis
18 Years
64 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Phillip Hess
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philip E Hess, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beth Isreal Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014P000267
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.