Response Patterns to the Electric Stimulation of Epidural Catheters in Term Pregnant Women

NCT ID: NCT02274467

Last Updated: 2015-02-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Lumbar epidural analgesia is commonly used for labor pain relief due to its effectiveness and safety. Despite its very high success rate, the epidural technique remains a rather blind technique and failures continue to occur. The correct placement of an epidural catheter, however, remains a clinical problem, since there is no imaging technique that could be used at the bedside to determine the exact positioning of the catheter. The technique of a trans-catheter electric stimulation test (TCEST) has been successfully used to detect the proper epidural catheter location for pediatric, post-operative and laboring obstetric patients. The response to the TCEST with the uniport (single hole) epidural catheters has been well described. There is a growing body of evidence that multiport epidural catheters provide an advantage to uniport catheters, since additional ports likely allow for an enhanced distribution of the local anesthetic solution. This was shown to result in a lower incidence of inadequate analgesia, including unilateral sensory blockade and missed sensory segments. The characteristics of the TCEST response using a multiport catheter remain to be determined. The aim of this study is to compare the response patterns to the TCEST using a single port versus multiport wire reinforced epidural catheters. The hypothesis of this study is that the incidence of a bilateral response to the TCEST will be higher in the multiport catheter as compared to the uniport catheter.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a randomized double-blind controlled study. After recruitment of the patient, epidural anesthesia will be performed in the standard fashion employed in the investigators institution by a resident, fellow, or staff. Spinal ultrasound will be used prior to performing the epidural catheter insertion. Patients will be randomly allocated into two different groups to receive either a 19 gauge uniport catheter or a 19 gauge multiorifice catheter (Arrow Flextip plus, Arrow International Inc., Reading, PA). After securement of the catheter, the TCEST will be performed. The test will be repeated at 5 minutes, following a test dose, to determine the change in intensity of current required to elicit the motor response. Following the second testing, a loading dose of the standard anesthetic solution will be administered. The sensory level to ice will be tested at 20 minutes following injection of the loading dose of bupivacaine and fentanyl. The sensory level will be assessed from the sacral to the thoracic levels, bilaterally Failure of the epidural analgesia will be assessed, defined as no evidence of a sensory block to ice and absent pain relief. The need for catheter replacement will be determined within 2 hours of the completion of the loading dose.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labor Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Uniport catheter

19 gauge uniport epidural catheter

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Trans-catheter electric stimulation test

Intervention Type DEVICE

Multiport catheter

19 gauge multiorifice epidural catheter

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Trans-catheter electric stimulation test

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trans-catheter electric stimulation test

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Tsui test

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women over 18 years of age requesting an epidural for labor and delivery
* Able to communicate in English
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to provide written informed consent
* Unable to communicate in English
* Allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine, bupivacaine or fentanyl
* Abnormal vertebral anatomy, including previous spine surgery and scoliosis
* Coexisting neurological disorders
* Implanted electronic devices
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jose Carvalho, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14-05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.