Identification of the Sensory Level Block to Cold During Epidural Analgesia for Labor: A Cohort Study to Determine the Influence of the Direction of Testing

NCT ID: NCT03572439

Last Updated: 2019-02-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-17

Study Completion Date

2019-01-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Assessment of the upper sensory block level during neuraxial analgesia for labor and delivery is an essential component of clinical management and patient safety. A variety of methods have been used for testing the sensory block such as cold, light touch, sharp touch or prick and transcutaneous electrical stimulation. In addition to the diversity of methods, the endpoints used by investigators have also been variable, considering total or partial responses as endpoints. Not surprisingly, a variable sensory block level could be identified as a result of the different methods and types of question asked by the examiner. Another complicating factor is the lack of standardization of the direction of the testing as it relates to anesthetized and non-anesthetized areas. This lack of standardization may result in a difference of several dermatomes in the level that two different assessors might record for the same patient. Considering a clinical research scenario, it may be difficult to replicate results and implement clinical practices. The objective of this study is to determine the degree of agreement between two methods of assessing the sensory block level to cold in women receiving epidural analgesia for labor (anesthetized to non-anesthetized segments versus non-anesthetized to anesthetized segments).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labor Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cephalad to caudal

Sensory block level check using ice, moving from cephalad to caudal

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sensory block level check using ice

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients are asked to report when the ice feels as cold as it does on the forehead.

Caudal to cephalad

Sensory block level check using ice, moving from caudal to cephalad

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sensory block level check using ice

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients are asked to report when the ice feels as cold as it does on the forehead.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sensory block level check using ice

Patients are asked to report when the ice feels as cold as it does on the forehead.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who request and have no contraindications to receive epidural analgesia
* capable of understanding and signing the written informed consent
* have no language barrier to respond to the level of sensory block assessment
* have no conditions that could compromise their sensitivity to cold.

Exclusion Criteria

* patients who refuse to sign consent
* epidural analgesia is contraindicated
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jose CA Carvalho, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

de Souza Soares EC, Balki M, Downey K, Ye XY, Carvalho JCA. Assessment of sensory block during labour epidural analgesia: a prospective cohort study to determine the influence of the direction of testing. Can J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;69(6):750-755. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02228-x. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35289377 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.