Epidural Wave Form Analysis vs Fluoroscopic Guidance for Thoracic Epidural Placement
NCT ID: NCT07217457
Last Updated: 2025-10-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
160 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-12
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cervical Epidural Waveform Analysis Using Pressure Monitoring Kit
NCT02838654
The Use of Electrical Stimulation for Determination of Epidural Catheter Placement
NCT06055686
Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique
NCT02271100
Utilizing Ultrasound for Residents as an Aid in Epidural Placement
NCT03378492
A Factorial Trial of Ultrasound and Manometry to Improve the Success of Thoracic Epidural Placement
NCT03559023
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
If EWA performs reasonably well compared to FC, then EWA could be used in settings where anesthesia providers do not have access to fluoroscopy or the expertise to perform fluoroscopic-guided thoracic epidurals. EWA uses clinically approved pressure transducers, which are used commonly to analyze other physiologic pressures (e.g. invasive hemodynamic monitoring and invasive intracranial pressure monitoring.) and could offer a low budget way to help reassure that placement of a needle is indeed epidural, and not in a different location.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study Cohort
The primary objective of this study is to assess the accuracy with which epidural waveform analysis (EWA) can confirm epidural access in comparison to the gold standard of fluoroscopic confirmation (FC). Our hypothesis is that FC is superior to EWA. We will determine the Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value of EWA referenced to FC.Every participant enrolled in the study will be in the experimental arm and will undergo epidural waveform analysis and fluoroscopic confirmation of epidural access.
Epidural Waveform Analysis
All participants in this study will undergo epidural waveform analysis (pressure measurements) and fluoroscopic guidance of epidural placement. Epidural waveform analysis as method to determine epidural access will be compared to fluoroscopic confirmation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Epidural Waveform Analysis
All participants in this study will undergo epidural waveform analysis (pressure measurements) and fluoroscopic guidance of epidural placement. Epidural waveform analysis as method to determine epidural access will be compared to fluoroscopic confirmation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergoing surgery at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
* Scheduled for planned (non-emergent, non-urgent) thoracic epidural placement as part of surgery and anesthesia
* English speaking
* Must have capacity for consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Incarceration
* Pregnant
* Minors (under age 18)
* Inability to provide consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alexander T. Abess
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alexander Abess, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hong JH, Jung SW. Analysis of epidural waveform for cervical epidural steroid injections confirmed with fluoroscopy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0202. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010202.
Arnuntasupakul V, Van Zundert TC, Vijitpavan A, Aliste J, Engsusophon P, Leurcharusmee P, Ah-Kye S, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A Randomized Comparison Between Conventional and Waveform-Confirmed Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):368-73. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000369.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY02002726
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.