Epidural Wave Form Analysis vs Fluoroscopic Guidance for Thoracic Epidural Placement

NCT ID: NCT07217457

Last Updated: 2025-10-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-12

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of epidural waveform analysis (EWA) with fluoroscopic guidance for confirmation of successful epidural placement. In this study, participants will undergo both EWA and fluoroscopy. EWA involves measuring the pressure in the epidural space once accessed and determining whether or not a waveform that corresponds with the participant's heart rate is present. The pressure measuring apparatus is the same that is used for direct pressure monitoring elsewhere in the body (i.e. invasive arterial catheters or intracranial pressure monitoring).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the accuracy with which epidural waveform analysis (EWA) can confirm epidural access in comparison to the gold standard of fluoroscopic confirmation (FC). Our hypothesis is that FC is superior to EWA. We will determine the Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value of EWA referenced to FC.

If EWA performs reasonably well compared to FC, then EWA could be used in settings where anesthesia providers do not have access to fluoroscopy or the expertise to perform fluoroscopic-guided thoracic epidurals. EWA uses clinically approved pressure transducers, which are used commonly to analyze other physiologic pressures (e.g. invasive hemodynamic monitoring and invasive intracranial pressure monitoring.) and could offer a low budget way to help reassure that placement of a needle is indeed epidural, and not in a different location.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Epidural Placement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study Cohort

The primary objective of this study is to assess the accuracy with which epidural waveform analysis (EWA) can confirm epidural access in comparison to the gold standard of fluoroscopic confirmation (FC). Our hypothesis is that FC is superior to EWA. We will determine the Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value of EWA referenced to FC.Every participant enrolled in the study will be in the experimental arm and will undergo epidural waveform analysis and fluoroscopic confirmation of epidural access.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Epidural Waveform Analysis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

All participants in this study will undergo epidural waveform analysis (pressure measurements) and fluoroscopic guidance of epidural placement. Epidural waveform analysis as method to determine epidural access will be compared to fluoroscopic confirmation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Epidural Waveform Analysis

All participants in this study will undergo epidural waveform analysis (pressure measurements) and fluoroscopic guidance of epidural placement. Epidural waveform analysis as method to determine epidural access will be compared to fluoroscopic confirmation.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older
* Undergoing surgery at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
* Scheduled for planned (non-emergent, non-urgent) thoracic epidural placement as part of surgery and anesthesia
* English speaking
* Must have capacity for consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-english speaking
* Incarceration
* Pregnant
* Minors (under age 18)
* Inability to provide consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alexander T. Abess

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexander Abess, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hong JH, Jung SW. Analysis of epidural waveform for cervical epidural steroid injections confirmed with fluoroscopy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0202. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010202.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29595657 (View on PubMed)

Arnuntasupakul V, Van Zundert TC, Vijitpavan A, Aliste J, Engsusophon P, Leurcharusmee P, Ah-Kye S, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A Randomized Comparison Between Conventional and Waveform-Confirmed Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):368-73. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000369.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26894628 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY02002726

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.