Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-05-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This is a prospective cohort study to evaluate the accuracy of the automated spinal landmark identification technique using image processing system based on identification by experienced investigator using ultrasound in subjects requiring spinal anesthesia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Real-Time Ultrasound-guidance Facilitates Paramedian Spinal Anaesthesia
NCT02830035
Ultrasound Determination of Needle Depth in Epidurals in Adult Patients
NCT00981916
Three-Dimensional Ultrasound (3D US) in Parturients
NCT01523249
Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique
NCT02271100
Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia: Pre-procedure Versus Real-time Scan
NCT03805958
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The ultrasound imaging technique has found its way to neuraxial procedures as an imaging method to detect the inner anatomical structure of the lumbar spine and is superior to the traditional palpation method. However, a full interpretation of ultrasound images requires professional training and experience.
The overall aim of this proposal is to develop an automated spinal landmark identification system to improve patient safety and efficacy of neuraxial procedure needle insertion success. The primary aim is to develop an automated spinal landmark identification algorithm using image processing system to achieve 90% 1st spinal needle success rate within 12 months. The investigators will recruit 100 subjects in a prospective cohort study to investigate the spinal needle success rate as a clinically relevant outcome.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Weight of 40-90kg and height of 140-180cm;
* BMI less than 30.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of spinal instrumentation;
* Drug allergy to ultrasound transmission gel;
* Visible wound or injury in the lumbar spine.
21 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National University of Singapore
OTHER
KK Women's and Children's Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ban Leong Sng, MBBS, MMED
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
KK Women's and Children's Hospital
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Oh TT, Ikhsan M, Tan KK, Rehena S, Han NR, Sia ATH, Sng BL. A novel approach to neuraxial anesthesia: application of an automated ultrasound spinal landmark identification. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0726-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SHF-NHIC/MT006/2015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.