Pain Relief and and Peripheral Perfusion Index During Erector Spinae Block

NCT ID: NCT06963424

Last Updated: 2026-01-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-13

Study Completion Date

2025-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary endpoint of this study is to compare the pain relief and peripheral perfusion index when local anesthetics injected in different final target area during lumbar erector spinae block The secondary endpoint of this study is to compare the procedure related pain

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a less invasive, safer, and technically easy alternative procedure to conventional neuraxial anesthetic techniques. In contrast to common neuraxial techniques such as paravertebral and epidural injections, the ESPB targets an interfascial plane which is far from the spinal cord, root, and pleura. First applied to thoracic neuropathic pain, currently ESPB is being applied to postoperative pain control and includes variable clinical situations. In the abdomen and thoracic wall, thoracic ESPB can be applied for pain control after cardiac surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and thoracotomy. Recently, favorable postoperative pain control after lumbar spinal or lower limb surgeries has been reported with lumbar ESPB. In addition, ESPB has also been used for chronic pain conditions in the upper and lower extremities. The final target area of ESPB of cervical, thoarcic, and lumbar regiona is transverse process. Once the needle contact the tip of the transverse process, local anesthetics is injected subsequentely. However, contacting the bony structure with the needle can generage procedure related pain. If ESPB can be performed without touching the transverse process, the satisfaction of patient would be increased. Actually, intertransverse ligament, which is visibe by ultrasound, is present between transverse process. Therefore, if local anesthetics is injected after targeting intertransverse ligament, same effect of pain relief with tarting of transverse process of ESPB is uncertain

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Block Block, Fascicular Spinae

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

intertransverse ligagment group

lumbar ESPB was performed with final target at intertransverse ligament

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

lumbar erectro spinae block

transverse process group

lumbar ESPB was performed with final target at transverse process

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

lumbar erectro spinae block

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erector Spinae Plane Block

lumbar erectro spinae block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* lumbar disc herniation
* lumbar foraminal stenosis
* lumbar central stenosis
* lumbar spondylolisthesis
* numerical rating scale \> 4
* back pain functional scale \< 45
* duration of pain \> 1 mon
* patients who can fully understand all items described in back pain functional scale

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy to local anesthetics or contrast medium
* Pregnancy
* Spine deformity
* Prior history of lumbar spine surgery
* No previous lumbar MRI or CT
* Patients with coagulation abnormality
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ji Hee Hong

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hong Ji Hee

Daegu, Daegu, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025-02-028

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.