Tonic Versus Burst DR(TM) Epidural Motor Cortex Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain
NCT ID: NCT05984329
Last Updated: 2024-08-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
14 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-07-15
2024-05-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis (EPI) in Patient With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04290221
Study on the Efficacy of Non-invasive Spinal Cord Electrical Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain
NCT07046143
Pilot Study in Order to Evaluate Disconfort Among Outpatients Using actiTENS for Neuropathic Pain vs TENS ECO 2.
NCT03877016
Association of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Hypnosis
NCT01944150
Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Human Observation Medtronic System Study (ECHO-MDT)
NCT06499220
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tonic then Burst DR(TM)
Tonic Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) for 3 months then Burst DR(TM) MCS for 3 months
Retrospective analysis of patients' choice
Retrospective analysis of patients' choice of tonic or Burst DR(TM) waves for their analgesic effect.
Burst DR(TM) then tonic
Burst DR(TM) MCS for 3 months then tonic MCS for 3 months
Retrospective analysis of patients' choice
Retrospective analysis of patients' choice of tonic or Burst DR(TM) waves for their analgesic effect.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Retrospective analysis of patients' choice
Retrospective analysis of patients' choice of tonic or Burst DR(TM) waves for their analgesic effect.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
François VASSAL, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU SAINT-ETIENNE
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chu Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRBN872022/CHUSTE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.