The Effect of Designed SIA Instrument Supported Interpersonal Relations-Based Group Practice on Psychological Well-Being and Creativity
NCT ID: NCT05869006
Last Updated: 2023-05-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-12
2023-03-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Is group practice based on interpersonal relations supported by the designed SIA instrument effective in increasing the psychological well-being levels of individuals?
* Is group practice based on interpersonal relations supported by the designed SIA instrument effective in increasing the creativity levels of individuals? Group study consisting of 6 sessions was applied to the participants. Sessions were administered once a week. It took six weeks. The effect of group practice based on interpersonal relations, supported by the designed SIA instrument, on individuals' psychological well-being and creativity levels was investigated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of the Psychoeducation Program on the Subjective Well-being of Caregivers
NCT05068765
The Effectiveness of a CA-CBI on Psychological Distress of University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic
NCT04858789
The Effect of Therapeutic Play on Children's Pain and Fear and Parents and Students' Satisfaction Levels
NCT06593002
'Digitalization in Psychoeducation' The Effect of Tele-Psychoeducation on Problem-Solving Skills and Stress
NCT05405699
The Effect of Psychosocial Factors on Academic Success in University Students
NCT06534879
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In a single-blind randomized controlled trial, a 3x4 split-plot design was used. The sample group was determined in two stages. The target group consisted of those who had scores lower than the mean scores of the Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWS) total score obtained from the nursing students who accepted to participate in the study. A stratified randomization was carried out according to gender with 30 students who met the criteria for inclusion in the sample from the determined target group. The study was conducted with a total of 30 students, 10 of whom were in the intervention group, 10 in the placebo control group, and 10 in the control group. Research data were collected with Descriptive Information Form, Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWS) and Creativity Scale (CS). A group application based on Peplau's Interpersonal Relations Theory, supported by the SIA instrument, was applied to the individuals in the intervention group. It is a rhythm instrument with a water effect sound, designed by SIA researchers and has a national utility model registration certificate. Music therapy techniques were also used in practice. The application was completed in a total of six weeks, one session per week. The placebo control group application was carried out simultaneously with the intervention group application, and the group application without active curative content was applied. No intervention was applied to the control group. In order to evaluate the data, PWS and SR were applied at time series points (pretest, posttest, 1st month follow-up and 3rd month follow-up).
In the analysis of the data, Descriptive statistics, Normal distribution of the data related to continuous variables were evaluated with the Shapiro Wilk test of normality. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare the variances of more than two independent groups when the assumption of normality of continuous variables was met. Repeated measures ANOVA (repeated measure ANOVA) was used when the assumption of normality was provided in the in-group and between-group comparisons for repeated measures. In the absence of normality, the nonparametric test (Nonparametric Tests for the F1-LD-F1 Design) was used for repeated measurements. In cases where the group\*time interaction was significant, evaluations independent of the time effect were made and repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman tests were used. A value of p\<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
No attempt was made. Measurement tools were applied simultaneously with the placebo control group and intervention group before, after and during the follow-up.
* pretest
* final test
* Evaluated by follow-up measurements.
No interventions assigned to this group
Placebo Control Group
A symbolic intervention consisting of six sessions, which was different from the content of the sessions applied to the intervention group, did not have any curative and active content, and was carried out simultaneously with the intervention group as the application time, was applied.
Sessions lasted approximately one hour. It was carried out once a week. It was completed in six weeks. In the sessions, the problems faced by nursing students due to distance education during the Covid-19 pandemic, professional difficulties, experiences, and issues related to their professional goals were discussed.
The effectiveness of the semi-structured sessions;
* pretest
* symbolic group work
* final test
* evaluated by follow-up measurements.
Placebo group practice
The placebo control group application was carried out simultaneously with the intervention group application, and the group application without active curative content was applied.
Intervention Group
A semi-structured group study consisting of six sessions based on interpersonal relations supported by the designed SIA instrument was applied. Sessions lasted approximately one hour. One session per week was administered. It was completed in six weeks. The initiatives applied in the sessions were implemented based on Peplau's theory of Interpersonal Relations. Group work was supported by the SIA instrument and music therapy techniques were used. In addition, positive psychology and psychological well-being literature were examined in the creation of initiatives. The effectiveness of semi-structured sessions;
* pretest
* group interaction study consisting of six sessions
* final test
* evaluated by follow-up measurements.
Designed SIA Instrument Supported Interpersonal Relations-Based Group Practice
Group Practice
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Designed SIA Instrument Supported Interpersonal Relations-Based Group Practice
Group Practice
Placebo group practice
The placebo control group application was carried out simultaneously with the intervention group application, and the group application without active curative content was applied.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Agreeing to participate in the research and volunteering to go to the rhythm guitar featured group practice.
* Being in the second or third grade.
* To have a lower score than the PWS total score limits (X=356.52) obtained from all students in the sample pool.
Exclusion Criteria
* Having a self-reported mental illness diagnosis
* Individuals included in the initiative group do not attend two or more sessions
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ege University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Derya Küliğ Atabey
PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ayşegül DÖNMEZ, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ege University Faculty of Nursing
Derya KÜLİĞ ATABEY, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ege University Hospital (Application and Research Center)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ege University
Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EGE-ATABEY-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.