Balanced Multi-Electrolyte Solution Versus Saline Trial for Diabetic KetoAcidosis
NCT ID: NCT05752279
Last Updated: 2025-09-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
680 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-14
2026-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
0.9% Saline Versus Balanced Solutions in Severe Diabetic Ketoacidosis
NCT05808972
Plasma-Lyte 148® versUs Saline Study
NCT02721654
Intravenous Fluids in Adults With Diabetic Ketoacidosis in the Emergency Department
NCT04926740
Two Bag System for Hydration in Diabetes
NCT01631929
Electrolyte Balance Effects of Sterofundin Versus Normal Saline in Diabetic Ketoacidosis
NCT06399510
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Increasing incidences were observed predominantly in rural and metropolitan hospitals (Figure 1), about 88% of the admissions to the ICU were from the ED. The median (IQR) ICU and hospital length of stay were 1.8 (1-2.8) and 4 (2.6-7.4) days respectively. Recent data from the ANZICS-CORE database confirmed the persistent high admission rate of severe DKA to Australian ICUs - 2849 and 2862 admissions in 2019 and 2020.
A major review of DKA management protocols in 2017 concluded that there are major deficiencies in evidence for optimal management of DKA(33). Current practice is guided by weak evidence and consensus opinion.
Studies comparing Plasma-Lyte® 148 vs. 0.9% saline in DKA demonstrate a trend towards a more rapid resolution of acidosis, equivalent glucose control and stable ketones with Plasma-Lyte® 148. In addition, there are trends towards reduced length of ICU and hospital stay with the use of Plasma-Lyte® 148.
Given the clinical uncertainty and substantial variability in practice. there is a scientific, clinical and health economic imperative to conduct a high-fidelity study to provide definitive evidence to inform clinicians regarding the choice of resuscitation fluids for patients with DKA. BEST-DKA will address this critical knowledge gap.
BEST-DKA is a multi-centre, blinded, cluster-crossover trial conducted in 20 Australian hospitals, consisting of two 12-month intervention periods with a one-month inter-period gap.
Each hospital is a single cluster, with all patients admitted with DKA to that hospital's ED during the intervention periods will potentially be eligible for inclusion in the trial. After the first 12-month intervention period during which recruited patients will receive either Plasma-Lyte® 148 or 0.9% saline, there will be a one-month inter-period gap during which patients will not be recruited into the trial. Following this each critical care area will change to using the fluid to which they were not assigned for the first period (Figure 4). All included patients will receive blinded fluids (Plasma-Lyte® 148 or 0.9% saline) as part of their DKA therapy depending on the fluid assigned to the site for the relevant intervention period.
Both study fluids are manufactured by Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd (Old Toongabbie, NSW) and will be labelled, packed and distributed by the company directly to the study sites in periodic shipments. Study fluid will be coded and labelled in compliance with applicable regulations, and in a manner that protects the blinding.
All clinicians involved in the prescription of blinded study treatment must read Product Information for both Plasma-Lyte® 148 and 0.9% saline which provide detailed information about the composition, indications, side effects, suggested dosage and contraindications of the study treatments.
The volume and rate of blinded study fluid administered will be guided by the standard clinical endpoints determined by the treating clinician. Study treatments will be started following study enrolment and continue until discharge from a critical care area or for a maximum of 72 hrs, whichever is earlier. If patients are re-admitted to the critical care area within 72 hours with a relapse of ketoacidosis, the clinician may use open label fluids for the managements of ketoacidosis. within 72 hours they will continue to receive blinded treatment fluid. Glucose containing solutions can be added in as required for blood glucose or ketosis management. The use of bicarbonate therapy and the need for potassium, phosphate and magnesium supplementation will be at the discretion of the treating clinician and data on its use will be collected.
The primary outcome will be evaluated at day-28 and patients contacted via telephone.
End-user/consumer representatives have been involved in all components of the research program including protocol development, choice of primary outcome, funding applications, and membership of the management committee. End-user/consumer representatives will continue to be involved in the conduct of the study and play a key role in the dissemination of results. Currently, membership of the study management committee includes the President of the advocacy group, Diabetes Australia; Director of Australian Centre for Accelerating Diabetes Innovations (ACADI); and a consumer who lives with diabetes.
This study aligns with the Medical Research Future Fund (Australia Government grant) funded ACADI objective to address the acute complications of diabetes including management of DKA.
The study has been endorsed by the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and a letter of support from for the study from Diabetes Australia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Plasma-Lyte® 148
Plasma-Lyte® 148 fluid 1L given intravenously for fluid replacement
Plasma-Lyte 148
Plasma-Lyte® 148 intravenous fluid for resuscitation in patients with keto-acidosis
0.9% sodium chloride
Normal saline fluid 1L given intravenously for fluid replacement
0.9% sodium chloride
0.9% sodium chloride intravenous fluid for resuscitation in patients with keto-acidosis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Plasma-Lyte 148
Plasma-Lyte® 148 intravenous fluid for resuscitation in patients with keto-acidosis
0.9% sodium chloride
0.9% sodium chloride intravenous fluid for resuscitation in patients with keto-acidosis
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Blood glucose level \> 14mmol/L
* pH \< 7.25
* Serum bicarbonate \<15 mmol/L
* Elevated anion gap \> 12mEq/L
* Ketones positive on finger prick measurements
* In the judgement of the treating clinician critical care area admission is required
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have received more than 2000ml of non study fluid prior to study enrolment
* Serum Na \> 155 or \<120 mmol/L
* Contraindication to either study fluid e.g. previous allergic reaction to Plasma-Lyte® 148
* Patients with hyperosmotic hyperglycaemic non-ketotic syndrome
* Other clinical conditions that preclude large volumes of fluid resuscitation
* Previous inclusion in BEST-DKA trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The George Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Blacktown Hospital
Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia
Camperdown Hospital
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Dubbo Base Hospital
Dubbo, New South Wales, Australia
St George Hospital
Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
Maitland Hospital
Metford, New South Wales, Australia
Orange Hospital
Orange, New South Wales, Australia
Royal North Shore Hospital
St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Sunshine Coast University Hospital
Birtinya, Queensland, Australia
Caboolture Hospital
Caboolture, Queensland, Australia
Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital
Coopers Plains, Queensland, Australia
Redcliffe Hospital
Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia
Rockhampton Hospital
Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Gold Coast University Hospital
Southport, Queensland, Australia
Lyell McEwin Hospital
Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
Ballarat Base Hospital
Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
Monash Health-Casey Hospital
Berwick, Victoria, Australia
Dandenong Hospital
Dandenong, Victoria, Australia
Frankston Hospital - Peninsula Health
Frankston, Victoria, Australia
Latrobe Regional Hospital
Traralgon, Victoria, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TGI CCP-2378-352
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.