Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
5037 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-01
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Balanced Multi-Electrolyte Solution Versus Saline Trial for Diabetic KetoAcidosis
NCT05752279
Normal Saline Versus Plasmalyte in Initial Resuscitation of Trauma Patients
NCT01270854
Chloride High Level Of Resuscitation Infusion Chloride High Level Of Resuscitation Infusion Delivered Evaluation
NCT00885404
Nebulised Rt-PA for ARDS Due to COVID-19
NCT04356833
Comparison of Colloid (20% Albumin) Versus Crystalloid (Plasmalyte) for Fluid Resuscitation in Cirrhotics With Sepsis Induced Hypotension.
NCT02721238
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Worldwide, 0.9% saline has traditionally been the most widely used resuscitation fluid, however its use is increasingly challenged by emerging evidence that suggests its high chloride content may have clinically important adverse effects and that resuscitation with so-called "balanced" or "buffered" crystalloids (such as Plasma-Lyte 148®) offer patients better outcomes.
Given the limitations of current evidence, there is now a scientific, ethical and health economic imperative to provide an accurate and reliable estimate of the comparative risks versus benefit of Plasma-Lyte 148® versus 0.9% saline.
The PLUS study is a prospective, multi-centre, parallel group, concealed, blinded, randomised, controlled trial.
The study will test the hypothesis that in a heterogeneous population of critically ill adults, random assignment to Plasma-Lyte 148® for intravascular volume resuscitation and crystalloid fluid therapy in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) results in different 90-day all-cause mortality when compared with random assignment to 0.9% sodium chloride (saline) for the same treatment.
Each patient who meets all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria will be randomised to receive either Plasma-Lyte 148® or 0.9% saline for all resuscitation episodes and for all compatible crystalloid therapy while in ICU for up to 90 days after randomisation. Other crystalloid fluids may be used as carrier fluids for the infusion of any drug for which either Plasma-Lyte 148® or 0.9% saline is considered incompatible.The study treatments will be supplied in identical 1000 ml bags and treatment assignment will be concealed.
The volume of study fluid being administered will be titrated against clinical endpoints determined by the treating clinicians and reviewed as clinically appropriate during the period of resuscitation and ICU treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Plasma-Lyte 148®
Following randomisation, each study participant will receive either Plasma-Lyte 148® or 0.9% saline alone for all resuscitation episodes and for all compatible intravenous crystalloid therapy while in ICU (for up to 90 days).
Plasma-Lyte 148®
Plasma-Lyte 148 (approx pH 7.4) IV infusion is a sterile, clear nonpyrogenic isotonic solution \& when administered intravenously it is a source of water, electrolytes \& calories. Plasma-Lyte 148 intravenous infusion is indicated as a source of water \& electrolytes or as an alkalinising agent.
0.9% sodium chloride
Following randomisation, each study participant will receive either Plasma-Lyte 148® or 0.9% saline alone for all resuscitation episodes and for all compatible intravenous crystalloid therapy while in ICU (for up to 90 days).
0.9% sodium chloride
The active ingredient is sodium chloride formulated in Water for Injections. The chemical name is sodium chloride with molecular formula NaCl. Sodium Chloride (0.9%) intravenous infusion preparation is a sterile \& non-pyrogenic solution \& is indicated for extracellular fluid replacement \& in the management of metabolic alkalosis in the presence of fluid loss, \& for restoring or maintaining the concentration of sodium \& chloride ions. As sodium chloride intravenous infusion is administered to the systemic circulation by intravenous infusion, the bioavailability (absorption) of the active components is complete (100 per cent).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Plasma-Lyte 148®
Plasma-Lyte 148 (approx pH 7.4) IV infusion is a sterile, clear nonpyrogenic isotonic solution \& when administered intravenously it is a source of water, electrolytes \& calories. Plasma-Lyte 148 intravenous infusion is indicated as a source of water \& electrolytes or as an alkalinising agent.
0.9% sodium chloride
The active ingredient is sodium chloride formulated in Water for Injections. The chemical name is sodium chloride with molecular formula NaCl. Sodium Chloride (0.9%) intravenous infusion preparation is a sterile \& non-pyrogenic solution \& is indicated for extracellular fluid replacement \& in the management of metabolic alkalosis in the presence of fluid loss, \& for restoring or maintaining the concentration of sodium \& chloride ions. As sodium chloride intravenous infusion is administered to the systemic circulation by intravenous infusion, the bioavailability (absorption) of the active components is complete (100 per cent).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient is expected to be in the ICU the day after tomorrow
* The patient is not expected to be well enough to be eating tomorrow
* An arterial or central venous catheter is in situ, or placement is imminent as part of routine management
* Both Plasma-Lyte 148® and 0.9% saline are considered equally appropriate for the patient
* The requirement for fluid resuscitation is supported by at least one of seven pre-specified clinical signs: heart rate \> 90 beats per minute; systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg or mean arterial pressure \< 75 mmHg; central venous pressure \< 10 mmHg; pulmonary artery wedge pressure \< 12 mmHg; capillary refill time \> 1 second; OR urine output \< 0.5 ml/kg for at least one hour
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have received more than 500mls of fluid resuscitation (as defined above) prescribed in the ICU during this current ICU admission
* Patients transferred directly from another ICU who have received more than 500mls of fluid resuscitation (as defined above) during that ICU admission
* Contraindication to either study fluid e.g. previous allergic reaction to Plasma-Lyte 148®
* Patients admitted to the ICU with specific fluid requirements: the treatment of burns; following liver transplantation surgery; for correction of specific electrolyte abnormalities
* Patients with traumatic brain injury or those considered at risk of developing cerebral oedema
* Patients in whom death is deemed imminent and inevitable
* Patients with an underlying disease process with a life expectancy of \<90 days
* Patients in whom it is unlikely the primary outcome can be ascertained
* Patients who have previously been enrolled in PLUS
* Known or suspected pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group
NETWORK
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
INDUSTRY
The George Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Simon Finfer, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
The George Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Blacktown Hospital
Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
The Sutherland Hospital
Caringbah, New South Wales, Australia
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Concord, New South Wales, Australia
Gosford Hospital
Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital
Hornsby, New South Wales, Australia
St George Hospital
Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
Liverpool Hospital
Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
Nepean
Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
Royal North Shore Hospital
St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
Wagga Wagga Rural Referral Hospital
Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia
The Sydney Adventist Hospital
Wahroonga, New South Wales, Australia
Calvary Mater Newcastle
Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Wollongong Hospital
Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
The Wesley Hospital
Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Herston, Queensland, Australia
Redcliffe Hospital
Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia
Robina Hospital
Robina, Queensland, Australia
Mater Misericordiae
South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Gold Coast University Hospital
Southport, Queensland, Australia
Toowoomba Hospital
Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Royal Hobart Hospital
Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Launceston General Hospital
Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
Ballarat Health Services
Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
Bendigo Hospital
Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
Box Hill Hospital
Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
Monash Medical Centre
Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Dandenong Hospital
Dandenong, Victoria, Australia
Footscray Hospital, Western Health
Footscray, Victoria, Australia
Frankston Hospital
Frankston, Victoria, Australia
Austin Hospital
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Maroondah Hospital
Ringwood East, Victoria, Australia
Sunshine Hospital, Western Health
St Albans, Victoria, Australia
St John of God Murdoch Hospital
Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
North Shore Hospital
Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand
Rotorua Hospital
Rotorua, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
Hawkes Bay
Hastings, Camberley, New Zealand
Christchurch Hospital
Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
Hutt Hospital
Lower Hutt, Wellington Region, New Zealand
Wellington Hospital
Newtown, Wellington Region, New Zealand
Auckland City Hospital (CVICU)
Auckland, , New Zealand
Auckland City Hospital (DCCM)
Auckland, , New Zealand
Middlemore Hospital
Auckland, , New Zealand
Waikato Hospital
Hamilton, , New Zealand
Nelson Hospital
Nelson, , New Zealand
Tauranga Hospital
Tauranga, , New Zealand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Finfer S, Micallef S, Hammond N, Navarra L, Bellomo R, Billot L, Delaney A, Gallagher M, Gattas D, Li Q, Mackle D, Mysore J, Saxena M, Taylor C, Young P, Myburgh J; PLUS Study Investigators and the Australian New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Balanced Multielectrolyte Solution versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 3;386(9):815-826. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114464. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1178-8334
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GI-CCT7587
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.