Isotonic Versus Hypotonic Fluid for Maintenance IV Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00457873

Last Updated: 2022-04-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-01-31

Study Completion Date

2008-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hyponatremia associated with administration of hypotonic intravenous (IV) fluids may have serious complications. It has recently been suggested that isotonic saline may be a more appropriate choice of maintenance IV fluid. This pilot and feasibility study aims to compare isotonic saline to 0.45% saline in hospitalized children requiring parenteral fluid support in order to:

Aim 1: To determine the feasibility of conducting a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing these solutions.

Aim 2a: To compare the rate of change in serum Na (mmol/L/hr) and the incidence of hyponatremia (Na \<136 mmol/L) between patients receiving isotonic and hypotonic intravenous fluids at at least 50% of the traditional maintenance rate for an interval of at least 8 hours.

Aim 2b: To compare the incidence of adverse events between the two IV fluid treatment groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastroenteritis Bronchiolitis Sepsis Urinary Tract Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

0.9% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

0.9% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)

Intervention Type DRUG

B

0.45% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.45% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0.9% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)

Intervention Type DRUG

0.45% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

isotonic saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1 month to 18 years of age
* Require IV fluids for at least 8 hr.
* Baseline serum sodium \>=136 mmol/L \& \<=145 mmol/L

Exclusion Criteria

* Baseline serum sodium concentration less than 136 mmol/L or greater than 145 mmol/L
* Renal disease, a history of cardiac dysfunction or evidence of cardiac dysfunction, pre-existing hypertension, diuretic use, edema, or known adrenal dysfunction
* Acute neurological illness such as meningitis or encephalitis
* Severe chronic neurological illnesses (uncontrolled seizure disorders, severe developmental delay)
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bethany Foster

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bethany J Foster, MD, MSCE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Montreal Children's Hospital Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Montreal Children's Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hoorn EJ, Geary D, Robb M, Halperin ML, Bohn D. Acute hyponatremia related to intravenous fluid administration in hospitalized children: an observational study. Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5):1279-84. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.5.1279.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15121942 (View on PubMed)

Moritz ML, Ayus JC. Prevention of hospital-acquired hyponatremia: a case for using isotonic saline. Pediatrics. 2003 Feb;111(2):227-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.2.227.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12563043 (View on PubMed)

Neville KA, Verge CF, Rosenberg AR, O'Meara MW, Walker JL. Isotonic is better than hypotonic saline for intravenous rehydration of children with gastroenteritis: a prospective randomised study. Arch Dis Child. 2006 Mar;91(3):226-32. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.084103. Epub 2005 Dec 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16352625 (View on PubMed)

Saba TG, Fairbairn J, Houghton F, Laforte D, Foster BJ. A randomized controlled trial of isotonic versus hypotonic maintenance intravenous fluids in hospitalized children. BMC Pediatr. 2011 Sep 23;11:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-82.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21943218 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PED-06-016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fluids in Sepsis and Septic Shock
NCT02748382 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3