Isotonic Versus Hypotonic Fluid for Maintenance IV Therapy
NCT ID: NCT00457873
Last Updated: 2022-04-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-01-31
2008-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim 1: To determine the feasibility of conducting a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing these solutions.
Aim 2a: To compare the rate of change in serum Na (mmol/L/hr) and the incidence of hyponatremia (Na \<136 mmol/L) between patients receiving isotonic and hypotonic intravenous fluids at at least 50% of the traditional maintenance rate for an interval of at least 8 hours.
Aim 2b: To compare the incidence of adverse events between the two IV fluid treatment groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
0.9% NaCl/Dextrose 5% vs 0.45% NaCl/Dextrose 5% as Maintenance Intravenous Fluids in Hospitalized Children
NCT00632775
Maintenance Intravenous Fluids in Children
NCT00621348
Hypotonic Versus Isotonic Parenteral (HIP) Fluid Trial
NCT00734214
Reexamining Hypotonic Intravenous Fluid Use
NCT02667977
0.9% NaCl/Dextrose 5% vs 0.45% NaCl/Dextrose 5% as Maintenance Intravenous Fluids in Critically Ill Children
NCT01301274
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
0.9% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)
0.9% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)
B
0.45% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)
0.45% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
0.9% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)
0.45% saline in 5% dextrose (intravenous)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Require IV fluids for at least 8 hr.
* Baseline serum sodium \>=136 mmol/L \& \<=145 mmol/L
Exclusion Criteria
* Renal disease, a history of cardiac dysfunction or evidence of cardiac dysfunction, pre-existing hypertension, diuretic use, edema, or known adrenal dysfunction
* Acute neurological illness such as meningitis or encephalitis
* Severe chronic neurological illnesses (uncontrolled seizure disorders, severe developmental delay)
1 Month
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bethany Foster
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bethany J Foster, MD, MSCE
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Montreal Children's Hospital Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Montreal Children's Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hoorn EJ, Geary D, Robb M, Halperin ML, Bohn D. Acute hyponatremia related to intravenous fluid administration in hospitalized children: an observational study. Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5):1279-84. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.5.1279.
Moritz ML, Ayus JC. Prevention of hospital-acquired hyponatremia: a case for using isotonic saline. Pediatrics. 2003 Feb;111(2):227-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.2.227.
Neville KA, Verge CF, Rosenberg AR, O'Meara MW, Walker JL. Isotonic is better than hypotonic saline for intravenous rehydration of children with gastroenteritis: a prospective randomised study. Arch Dis Child. 2006 Mar;91(3):226-32. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.084103. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
Saba TG, Fairbairn J, Houghton F, Laforte D, Foster BJ. A randomized controlled trial of isotonic versus hypotonic maintenance intravenous fluids in hospitalized children. BMC Pediatr. 2011 Sep 23;11:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-82.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PED-06-016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.