Clinical Evaluation of Chemically Cured Conventional Glass Ionomer After Light Emitting Diode Radiant Heat Enhancement

NCT ID: NCT05744622

Last Updated: 2023-02-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-20

Study Completion Date

2022-05-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction:

Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used in clinical dentistry due to their advantageous properties. However, they present inferior physical and mechanical properties compared to resin composites.

Aim:

Clinical evaluation of chemically cured conventional glass ionomer after light-emitting diode radiant heat enhancement. .

Methodology:

Eighteen healthy patients with 36-second molar teeth will be selected where each patient should have two oclusso- mesial cavities. Standardized oclusso- mesial cavities will be prepared for all the selected teeth, for each patient the first tooth will be restored with chemically cured conventional GICs without any enhancement (M1 group). Meanwhile, the second tooth will be restored by chemically cured conventional GICs that enhanced with radiant heat (LED) (M2 group). functional and biological criteria of each restoration will be clinically evaluated at 4 time points

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction:

Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used in clinical dentistry due to their advantageous properties. However, they present inferior physical and mechanical properties compared to resin composites. Various techniques have been suggested to improve properties of conventional GICs such as radiant heat transfer by Light Emitting Diode (LED) or lasers, ultrasonic energy transfer also using of (CaCl2) solution.

Aim:

Clinical evaluation of chemically cured conventional glass ionomer after light-emitting diode radiant heat enhancement. .

Methodology:

Eighteen healthy patients with 36-second molar teeth will be selected where each patient should have two oclusso- mesial cavities. Standardized oclusso- mesial cavities will be prepared for all the selected teeth, for each patient the first tooth will be restored with chemically cured conventional GICs without any enhancement (M1 group). Meanwhile, the second tooth will be restored by chemically cured conventional GICs that enhanced with radiant heat (LED) (M2 group). functional and biological criteria of each restoration will be clinically evaluated immediately after restoration (T0), six months later (T1), and after 12 months (T2) using Federation Dentaire International (FDI) criteria for assessment of dental restorations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

High Caries Risk Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

chemically cured conventional glass ionomer restorative (Ketac Universal Aplicap)

For restoration of M1 group, capsule activation will be performed through loading of the KetacTM Universal AplicapTM GIC capsule into its activator keeping the applicator nozzle closed, using the ball of my hand to depress the activator lever firmly as far as it will go and hold it down for 2 to 4 seconds. Then the capsule will be mixed in a high frequency mixing device for 8 seconds. The mixed capsule will be immediately removed from the mixer and loaded into the AplicapTM Applier then application nozzle will be opened to extrude the mixture directly into the preparation as a single bulk within 1:40 minute. The preliminary contour will be done using a ball burnisher.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

KetacTM Universal AplicapTM

Intervention Type OTHER

chemically cured conventional GICs

Ketac Universal Aplicap enhanced with light-emitting diode radiant heat

Restoration of M2 group will be performed following the same steps which will be carried out for M1 group but the achieved restorations will be enhanced by light-emitting diode radiant heat for 60 seconds

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

KetacTM Universal AplicapTM with light cure

Intervention Type OTHER

chemically cured conventional GICs with light curing enhancement

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

KetacTM Universal AplicapTM

chemically cured conventional GICs

Intervention Type OTHER

KetacTM Universal AplicapTM with light cure

chemically cured conventional GICs with light curing enhancement

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age group 21 - 45 years.
2. Both males and females will be included.
3. Ability to return for periodic follow-up (good general health).
4. Only co-operative patients.
5. Vital upper or lower carious posterior teeth.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Teeth with any pathologic pulpal disease.
2. Teeth with previous restorations
3. Teeth with surface loss due to attrition, erosion, abrasion, or abfraction.
4. Patients with severe or chronic periodontitis.
5. Patients have allergy to the materials used in this trial. 6- Nonfunctioning teeth with no opposing dentition.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Suez Canal University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

eman awad

Assistant lecturer operative dentistry department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of dentistry, Suez Canal university

Ismailia, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

431/2021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA