Assessment of Emotion Regulation Strategies Used When Suicidal

NCT ID: NCT05722197

Last Updated: 2025-06-24

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: RECRUITING
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 334 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2022-01-23
• Study Completion Date: 2027-01-23

Brief Summary

Crisis Response Planning is an efficacious, one-session intervention that increases positive affect, decreases negative affect and psychiatric hospitalizations, and reduces suicide attempts by 76% among Servicemembers. Crisis Response Planning is hypothesized to reduce suicidality by identifying a variety of personalized strategies that are designed to strengthen and/or promote emotion regulation processes.Research in nonmilitary samples suggests the effectiveness of emotion regulation strategies varies across situations. The applicability of these findings to suicidality among Servicemembers is unknown. Improved understanding of what strategies work under which circumstances and for whom will significantly advance our ability to prevent suicide among Servicemembers. Hypotheses include:

1. Use of self-management strategies, thinking about reasons for living, and seeking social support at time t will be associated with significant reductions in suicidal ideation at time t+1.

2. Use of distraction, reappraisal, and interpersonal emotion regulation strategies at time t will be associated with significant reductions in suicidal ideation at time t+1.

3. Affect intensity and social context will significantly moderate the time-lagged effects of Crisis Response Planning and emotion regulation strategy use on suicidal ideation.

4. Distinct profiles of demographic (e.g., gender, age), historical (e.g., prior suicide attempts), and psychological characteristics (e.g., emotion dysregulation, symptom severity) will predict who experiences a decrease in suicidal ideation following the use of Crisis Response Planning and emotion regulation strategies.

5. (Exploratory): Individuals who utilize their Crisis Response Planning more frequently and perceive Crisis Response Planning as more effective will be more likely to engage in mental health treatment at follow-up.

Conditions

Suicidal Ideation; Treatment Refusal; Emotion Regulation

Study Design

• Allocation Method: NA
• Intervention Model: SINGLE_GROUP
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Crisis Response Plan and Lethal Means Counseling

All participants will complete a narrative suicide risk assessment, collaboratively develop a Crisis Response Plan, and receive lethal means counseling. The Crisis Response Plan will include the following sections: (1) identifying personal warning signs for suicide; (2) identifying self-regulation strategies for reducing emotional distress; (3) identifying reasons for living; (4) identifying sources of social support; and (5) accessing professional crisis services. Participants will handwrite the plan on an index card, sheet of paper, or another similar medium. After completing the Crisis Response Planning, researchers will conduct lethal means counseling to develop a plan for restricting or limiting access to potentially lethal methods of suicide.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Crisis Response Planning and Lethal Means Safety Counseling

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Crisis Response Planning is an efficacious, one-session intervention that increases positive affect, decreases negative affect and psychiatric hospitalizations, and reduces suicide attempts by 76% among Servicemembers

Interventions

Crisis Response Planning and Lethal Means Safety Counseling

Crisis Response Planning is an efficacious, one-session intervention that increases positive affect, decreases negative affect and psychiatric hospitalizations, and reduces suicide attempts by 76% among Servicemembers

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Currently serving in any Branch or Component of the U.S. military
• >18 years old;
• Score ≥ 5 on the Scale for Suicidal Ideation and/or endorse a suicide attempt, aborted attempt, or interrupted attempt within the past month on the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised (SITBI-R)
• Ability and willingness to complete research-related activities remotely
• Regular access to an Android or Apple smartphone that is compatible with the ecological momentary assessment application

Exclusion Criteria

• Engagement in mental health treatment within the past year (including taking psychotropic medications)
• A psychiatric or medical condition that preventing providing informed consent or from participating in the treatments (e.g., psychosis, mania, acute intoxication); or - Expecting to separate from the military within 90 days

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Ohio State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Lauren Khazem

Research Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

United States

Central Contacts

Lauren Khazem, PhD

Role: CONTACT

lauren.khazem@osumc.edu

614-366-2294

Facility Contacts

Lauren Khazem, PhD

Role: primary

lauren.khazem@osumc.edu

614-366-2294

Other Identifiers

2022H0155

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id