Crisis Line Facilitation

NCT ID: NCT02459587

Last Updated: 2023-07-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

307 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-24

Study Completion Date

2019-12-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a randomized controlled trial (n = 301) of a new single-session intervention, called Crisis Line Facilitation (CLF), compared to an enhanced usual care condition on utilization of the Veterans Crisis Line and other mental health services as well as suicide attempt(s). All participants were recruited during an inpatient psychiatric stay for the treatment of a recent suicidal crisis and will be re-assessed at 3-, 6- and 12-months post baseline. If successful, the proposed study will provide key data on the potential efficacy of a brief tool to improve the utilization of an existing resource, the Veterans Crisis Line, to reduce suicidal behaviors in VHA patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients are at a significantly elevated risk for fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts and identifying strategies to reduce the risk of suicidal behavior among members of the military and Veterans is a high national priority. The VHA has invested extensively in suicide prevention and, as part of these efforts; the Veterans Crisis Line was developed as an important resource for Veterans and their families. Utilization of the Veterans Crisis Line has expanded steadily since it first opened and, currently, it receives over 20,000 calls per month. Despite high utilization of the Crisis Line, no data are currently available on whether use of the Veterans Crisis Line reduces an individual's likelihood of a suicide attempt or death and it is not feasible to test the efficacy of the Crisis Line in a randomized controlled trial because it is nationally available to all Veterans and their families. More importantly, the Veterans Crisis Line may not reach those individuals at most acute risk for suicide. The investigators' study team conducted a small survey of Veterans treated for recent suicidal crisis in a VHA inpatient psychiatric unit and found that less than half had ever utilized the Veterans Crisis Line and less than a third had used it within the past year. Consequently, the investigators have developed and gathered pilot data on a brief intervention designed to increase utilization of the Veterans Crisis Line among high risk patients, called Crisis Line Facilitation (CLF). This single-session intervention involves a discussion of the patient's perceived barriers of crisis line use during periods of suicidal crisis. The CLF session ends with the patient calling the Crisis Line with the therapist in the room as a way for Veterans to practice the logistics of making the call and to have direct experiences that may counter any negative beliefs about Veterans Crisis Line use. This study recruited 301 participants who were treated for a suicidal crisis in VHA inpatient psychiatric but had not recently used the Veterans Crisis Line. This study is a randomized controlled trial of the impact of CLF compared to enhanced usual care (EUC) on utilization of the Veterans Crisis Line and other mental health services as well as suicide attempt(s). All participants will be re-assessed at 3-, 6- and 12-months post baseline. Analyses will also examine the extent to which post-baseline Crisis Line use mediates the effect of random assignment to CLF on subsequent suicidal behaviors. Qualitative interviews at the end of the study will help understand barriers and facilitators of future implementation of the CLF intervention. If successful, the proposed study will provide key data on the potential efficacy of a brief intervention to improve the utilization of an existing resource, the Veterans Crisis Line, to reduce suicidal behaviors in VHA patients. Developing a brief and effective approach to encourage use of the Crisis Line has the potential to have a significant and substantial impact on suicide rates within the VHA and could be modified and exported to other populations and settings.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Suicide Suicide, Attempted Hospitals, Psychiatric

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Crisis Line Facilitation (CLF)

Crisis Line Facilitation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Crisis Line Facilitation (CLF)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This single session therapist-delivered intervention addresses Veterans' perceived barriers and facilitators of crisis line use during periods of suicidal crisis. The CLF session culminates with the Veteran calling the Crisis Line with the therapist in the room as a way for the Veteran to practice the logistics of making the call and to have direct experiences that may counter any negative beliefs about Crisis Line use.

Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)

Enhanced Usual Care

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Those in the EUC condition received the same promotional items and information about the Veterans Crisis Line (VCL) as the CLF condition. Participants were encouraged to seek help via a provider or the VCL if they felt suicidal in the future. Research staff briefly explained key information about the VCL to those in the EUC condition (e.g., the links between the VCL and the VA, the 24/7/365 availability, etc.).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Crisis Line Facilitation (CLF)

This single session therapist-delivered intervention addresses Veterans' perceived barriers and facilitators of crisis line use during periods of suicidal crisis. The CLF session culminates with the Veteran calling the Crisis Line with the therapist in the room as a way for the Veteran to practice the logistics of making the call and to have direct experiences that may counter any negative beliefs about Crisis Line use.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)

Those in the EUC condition received the same promotional items and information about the Veterans Crisis Line (VCL) as the CLF condition. Participants were encouraged to seek help via a provider or the VCL if they felt suicidal in the future. Research staff briefly explained key information about the VCL to those in the EUC condition (e.g., the links between the VCL and the VA, the 24/7/365 availability, etc.).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adults age 18 years of age or older receiving care in an inpatient psychiatric unit at either the BC VAMC or AA VAMC;
* mention of a significant suicidal crisis within the intake note;
* medically stable and able to provide informed consent; and
* Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than or equal to 21.


* no reported use of the Veterans Crisis Line within the past 12-months;
* report current suicidal ideation (BSS greater than or equals 5 during the week prior to hospitalization) as reported during the screening interview.

Exclusion Criteria

* patients who do not understand English;
* prisoners;
* patients deemed unable to provide informed consent as stated above;
* patients who recently received or are scheduled to receive electroconvulsive therapy (ECT); and
* profound psychotic symptoms and/or cognitive deficits that would prevent patients from understanding the content of the intervention and/or assessments.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark A. Ilgen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Battle Creek VA Medical Center, Battle Creek, MI

Battle Creek, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan: Ann Arbor

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan: Battle Creek

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Main Study Consent

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Qualitative Interview Consents

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIR 14-103

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Refinement of Suicide Risk Management Intervention
NCT04888845 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Couple-Based Crisis Safety Planning
NCT07012824 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Testing the Efficacy of ACT for Life
NCT04829682 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Suicide Risk Interventions
NCT05931289 RECRUITING PHASE2