Controlled Evaluation of a Computerized Anger-reduction Treatment for Suicide Prevention

NCT ID: NCT01918696

Last Updated: 2021-01-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a computerized intervention designed to reduce anger-provoking interpretation biases will reduce suicide risk among individuals with elevated levels of trait anger.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Problematic anger is often found among returning military veterans, especially those exposed to combat. Anger control problems are associated with difficulties with reintegration. One study of Iraq-Afghanistan combat veterans who used VA medical services (N = 754) found that difficulty controlling anger was the most commonly reported problem experienced since homecoming, occurring among 57% of the sample (Sayer et al., 2010). Problematic anger and hostility have also been linked to risk for suicide (Daniel et al., 2009; Lehnert, Overholser, \& Spirito, 1994; Maiuro, O'Sullivan, Michael, \& Vitaliano, 1989). From the perspective of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide (Joiner, 2005), individuals with problematic anger may be at increased risk for suicide because they engage in impulsive behaviors (e.g., aggression, substance abuse) intended to manage anger. Such behaviors may lead to exposure to painful and provocative events, which increase their acquired capability for engaging in suicidal behavior. Additionally, anger problems often lead to social isolation, which may contribute to greater perceived burdensomeness and a failed sense of belonging, established risk factors for suicide (Van Orden et al., 2010).

Anger prone individuals are likely to hold the hostile attribution bias, which reflects the tendency to interpret the ambiguous actions of others as reflecting hostile intent (Wilkowski \& Robinson, 2008). Recently, researchers have developed computerized interpretation bias modification (IBM) protocols intended to efficiently reduce interpretive biases. These treatments have shown efficacy in reducing anxiety and depression (Beard \& Amir, 2008; Holmes, Lang, \& Shah, 2009; Mathews et al., 2007). We have conducted studies using similar procedures that focus on hostile interpretation biases and found our program to successfully reduce anger and hostility.

To evaluate the efficacy of the IBM protocol we have developed in reducing anger and suicide risk, we will conduct a three-arm randomized controlled trial over the internet. Military veterans and non-veteran community participants reporting elevated trait anger (N = 120) will be randomized to one of three conditions: 1) IBM; 2) progressive muscle relaxation (PMR); or 3) healthy education videos (control). Each condition will consist of eight 15-minute treatment sessions. Participants will complete two sessions per week for four weeks and will be administered assessments at pre- and post-treatment. IBM and PMR conditions will also complete 3-month and 6-month follow-up assessments. To ensure an adequate test of the effects of this intervention on suicide risk, we will oversample for individuals with current suicidal ideation. We hypothesize that: 1) IBM will lead to greater reductions in anger than PMR and control conditions in a sample with problematic anger; 2) IBM will lead to greater reductions in suicidal ideation, perceived burdensomeness, and thwarted belongingness than PMR and control conditions; 3) efficacy of the IBM condition in reducing suicidal ideation will be mediated by reductions in perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness; 4) group differences between IBM and PMR will be maintained at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up assessments.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anger Suicidal Ideation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Anger Reduction Treatment

This treatment consists of eight 15-minute sessions. Participants will read scenarios and imagine themselves in these situations: "A driver does not let you over even though you have your blinker on." Next, another will appear to provide a less ambiguous interpretation. One letter will be missing from the key word of this sentence. The sentence will read "They can't s\_e you." The participant will fill in the missing letter (to form "see"). Next, this interpretation will be reinforced by requiring the participants to correctly answer "yes" or "no" to a comprehension question ("Is the driver being disrespectful?"). In each session 64 training scenarios will be presented. Participants will never see the same scenario twice over the course of the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anger Reduction Treatment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eight 15-minute sessions of interpretation modification to reduce angry interpretation biases.

Progressive Muscle Relaxation

Participants will receive eight 15-minute sessions of PMR. They will listen to a PMR script (Kassinove \& Tafrate, 2002). Participants will be asked to make sure they are sitting comfortably, close their eyes, and systematically tense and release 10 different muscle groups. At the end of this procedure, participants will create a plan for when they will use the exercise. They will then type out the sentence: "When I feel \[write the feeling you decided on\], then I will use this relaxation technique." They will then be told, "Now, go over what you have written and say it quietly to yourself until you can repeat it word for word without having to read what you have written."

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Progressive Muscle Relaxation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eight 15-minute sessions of progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) including formulation of a plan to use PMR when angry.

Control Condition

To control for expectancy effects, participants assigned to the control condition will complete eight computerized sessions consisting of psychoeducation on healthy behaviors. These sessions will be matched for time with the active conditions, lasting 15 minutes each. Psychoeducation will cover the topics of exercise, diet, hygiene, social support, healthy activities, and sleep, and will be taken from protocols developed from our ongoing research. This psychoeducation is perceived as credible but has no detectable impact on behavior. After the post-treatment session, participants will be provided with the active ART treatment free of charge if they wish to receive it.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Control Condition

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eight 15-minute sessions of informative videos on healthy living.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anger Reduction Treatment

Eight 15-minute sessions of interpretation modification to reduce angry interpretation biases.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Progressive Muscle Relaxation

Eight 15-minute sessions of progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) including formulation of a plan to use PMR when angry.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Control Condition

Eight 15-minute sessions of informative videos on healthy living.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* elevated levels of trait anger (scoring 19 or higher, or the top 25% of the general population)
* must have access to a computer with an internet connection
* must also be English speakers

Exclusion Criteria

* currently receiving therapy for problematic anger
* evidence of serious suicidal intent requiring hospitalization or immediate treatment
* evidence of psychotic-spectrum disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Florida State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jesse Cougle

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jesse R Cougle, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Florida State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Florida State University, Department of Psychology

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013.10885

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Refinement of Suicide Risk Management Intervention
NCT04888845 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA