Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-05-30
2026-11-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Open vs Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
NCT05767320
Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
NCT05699616
Morbidity After Surgical Treatment of Perforated Ulcer
NCT05489497
Open Versus Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
NCT06484699
Risk Factors Affecting Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcer
NCT07050199
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the population, the prevalence of ulcer disease supported physician diagnosis ranges from 0.12% to 1.50%, and hospitalization rates range from 0.10% to 0.19%. ulceration perforation (PUP) is one of the foremost common surgical emergencies worldwide, which is necessitate emergent surgical intervention.
the death rate of PUPs is between 1.3% and 20%, and mortality thanks to a perforation of a gastric ulcer is over mortality because of a perforation of a duodenal ulcer (40% vs 10%) . Some studies have shown that having comorbidities, being over 70 years old, undergoing surgical procedure after 36 h, PUP diameter greater than 1 cm2 and postoperative com- plications are associated with mortality. The technique of using the omental patch for repair PUP is commonest now thanks to mobility and vascularity but is also using the falciform ligament in some cases due to highly vascularity.
The technique of using the falciform ligament for the treatment of PUPs was reported in 1978 by Fry . The purpose of the study was to explain the technique and therefore the results of using the falciform ligament for the treat- ment of PUPs during a large volume surgical centre in Assuit university hospital found the falciform patch to be a successful technique in repair PUP and is assumed to be as effective as omental patch but more advantage because of highly vascular.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Falciformopexy for Treatment Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Use falciform ligament flap for repair perforated peptic ulcer
Falciformopexy for Treatment Perforated Peptic Ulcer
use the falciform ligament on perforated peptic ulcer
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Falciformopexy for Treatment Perforated Peptic Ulcer
use the falciform ligament on perforated peptic ulcer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous GIT and liver surgery.
* nonoperative treatment.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Doaa Hamada
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Doaa Hamada Abd elbaset
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fry DE, Richardson JD, Flint LM Jr. Closure of an acute perforated peptic ulcer with the falciform ligament. Arch Surg. 1978 Oct;113(10):1209-10. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1978.01370220095016.
Son TQ, Hoc TH, Huong TT, Long VD, Tung TT, Quyet NC, Panha L, Van Chi N. Outcomes of surgical management of peptic ulcer perforation using the falciform ligament: A cross-sectional study at a single centre in Vietnam. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jun 16;67:102477. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102477. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Sung JJ, Kuipers EJ, El-Serag HB. Systematic review: the global incidence and prevalence of peptic ulcer disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 May 1;29(9):938-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03960.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Falciform ligament on PPU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.