Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-30
2023-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Open vs Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
NCT05767320
Open Versus Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
NCT06484699
Outcome After Laparoscopic Surgery for Peptic Ulcer Perforation
NCT05147870
Falciformopexy for Treatment Perforated Peptic Ulcer.
NCT05715450
Morbidity After Surgical Treatment of Perforated Ulcer
NCT05489497
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Demographic, clinical and perioperative outcomes will be collected tabulated and analyzed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repair of perforated peptic ulcer
Repair of perforated peptic ulcer either open or laparoscopic.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
South Valley University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdallah Mohamed Taha Aly
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abdallah M Taha, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
South Valley University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University Hospitals
Qina, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA, van der Ham AC, van der Harst E, Oei HI, Smulders JF, Steyerberg EW, Lange JF. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg. 2009 Jul;33(7):1368-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0054-y.
Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1299-310. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7705-4.
Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ, Campos GM, Soroushyari A, Berne TV. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch Surg. 1999 Aug;134(8):845-8; discussion 849-50. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.134.8.845.
Lagoo S, McMahon RL, Kakihara M, Pappas TN, Eubanks S. The sixth decision regarding perforated duodenal ulcer. JSLS. 2002 Oct-Dec;6(4):359-68.
Quah GS, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Mar;23(3):618-625. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4047-8. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SVU-MED-SUR011-4-22-10-466
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.