Evaluation of Role of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Gross Total Resection of Gliomas
NCT ID: NCT05707728
Last Updated: 2023-02-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
45 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-03-31
2024-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Brain Tumor Intraoperative Ultrasound Database
NCT05062772
Assessing the Effectiveness of 2D Non-Navigated Intraoperative Ultrasound in Glioma Surgery
NCT05873946
Ultrasonography Guided Brain Lesions Resection:
NCT04569526
Intraoperative Ultrasound Guided Glioma Surgery; a Randomised, Controlled Trial.
NCT03531333
Intraoperative Sonographically Guided Resection of Non-enhancing Gliomas
NCT05470374
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Maximal safe resection represents the gold standard for surgery of malignant brain tumors:
gross total resection of the tumor while preserving the surrounding functional brain tissue is the main goal, since it is associated with longer survival and better patient quality of life This is particularly true for gliomas, the most common primary malignant brain tumors Concerning gross total resection, accurate localization and precise delineation of the tumor margins are required in order to avoid devastating lesions on nervous structures Ultrasound may provide an alternative tool to intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for delineating tumor Tissues and improving the chances of gross total resection The purpose of brain tumor removal is maximal resection while sparing healthy tissues. The extent of resection is a key prognostic factor in survival time, functional recovery, and tumor recurrence rates The optimal results of brain lesion surgery may be achieved by maximal surgical resection without disturbance of neurological functions Due to the imprecise correlation between preoperative images,intraoperative anatomy, and also poor differentiation of some tumors from a normal tissue, better delineation of normal from tumor tissue intraoperatively could improve clinical outcome as increasing chance of total resection and decreasing normal tissue damage . Intraoperative imaging technology increases the extent of tumor resection and patients' outcome including survival time.
Intraoperative MRI are time-consuming and of high cost. Computed tomography (CT) usually is not of choice as ionizing radiation and limited mass delineation. Several researches have demonstrated that the image quality of ultrasound has improved enough to visualize and guide tumor resection The most important disadvantage of neuronavigation is the inconsistency with preoperative images from changes of the lesion and critical anatomic structures associated with brain shift as intraoperative tumor resection or cerebrospinal fluid drainage. This creates the need for updating the preoperative image with the intraoperative image
The use of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS )seems to have significantly increased the Gross total Resection rate achieved in brain gliomas surgery. As regard intraoperative visualisation of the tumor and its residuals, the effectiveness of IOUS has been documented in a series of 192 High Grade glioma patients, in which the combination of neuronavigation and IOUS was also related to increased overall survival in a prospective study of 32 patients, documented a good level of agreement between intraoperative ultrasonography and postoperative contrast-enhanced MRI in detecting tumor residuel they concluded that the IOUS produces results similar to those of MRI, and therefore, can be used to maximize tumor resection.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
totally resection of glioma using intraoperative ultrasound
totally resection of glioma using intraoperative ultrasound
intraoperative ultrasound
intraoperative cranial ultrasound
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
intraoperative ultrasound
intraoperative cranial ultrasound
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age of the patient: any age.
* Both sex
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients unfit for surgery
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fadwa Ahmwd Ahmed
resident
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
1. Giammalva, G.R.; Iacopino, D.G.; Azzarello, G.; Gaggiotti, C.; Graziano, F.; Gulì, C.; Pino, M.; Maugeri, R. End-of-Life Care in High-Grade Glioma Patients. The Palliative and Supportive Perspective. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 125. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 2. La Torre, D.; Maugeri, R.; Angileri, F.F.; Pezzino, G.; Conti, A.; Cardali, S.M.; Calisto, A.; Sciarrone, G.; Misefari, A.; Germanò, A.; et al. Human leukocyte antigen frequency in human high-grade gliomas: A case-control study in Sicily. Neurosurgery 2009, 64, 1082-1088. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 3. Maugeri, R.; Schiera, G.; Di Liegro, C.M.; Fricano, A.; Iacopino, D.G.; Di Liegro, I. Aquaporins and brain tumors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1029. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 4. Grasso, G.; Meli, F.; Fodale, V.; Calapai, G.; Buemi, M.; Iacopino, D.G. Neuroprotective potential of erythropoietin and darbepoetin alfa in an experimental model of sciatic nerve injury. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2007, 7, 645-651. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 5. Unsgaard G, Ommendal S, Muller T, Gronningsaeter A, Hernes TAN. Neuronavigation by intraoperative three-dimensional ultrasound: initial experience during brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery. 2002;50(4): 804-12. 6. Almenawer SA, Badhiwala JH, Alhazzani W, Greenspoon J, Farrokhyar F, Yarascavitch B, et al. Biopsy versus partial versus gross total resection in older patients with high-grade glioma: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17(6):868-81. 7. Elserry TH, Anwer H, Radwan HA. Introduction of vaginal probe for intraoperative ultrasound of intra-axial brain lesions. Egyp J Neurosurg. 2013; 28(4):5-12. 8. Zhang ZZ, Shield LBE, Sun DA, Zhang YP, Hunt MA, Christopher BS. The art of intraoperative glioma identification. Front Oncol. 2015;5(175):1-7. 9. Gronningsaeter A, Kleven A, Ommedal S, Aarseth TE, Lie T, Lindseth F, Lango T, Unsgaar
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
intraoperative ultrasound
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.