PE-Bacon for Late Complications of Chronic Radiation-induced Rectal Injury
NCT ID: NCT05607927
Last Updated: 2022-11-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE3
316 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-11-20
2028-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Previous study proved that anastomosis with at least one end of bowel without radiation damage can greatly reduce postoperative anastomotic leakage rate and mortality. And in Bacon surgery, primary anastomosis is not performed, and the anastomotic tension markedly reduced and the blood supply of anastomosis can be judged intuitively to improve the quality of anastomosis in the second stage of intestinal anastomosis to decrease the anastomotic leakage rate. Combining the advantages of proximally extended resection and two-stage anastomosis could minimize potential complications and maximize the therapeutic efficacy in theory, and a small sample prospective clinical study by the investigator have already preliminarily confirmed it. The investigator has also preliminarily proved that Parks surgery is safe and feasible for the treatment of late complications of CRII.
Therefore, this study aims to observe the safety and effectiveness of PE-Bacon surgery with Parks surgery as a control, in order to select more optimal surgical methods and provide a high-level evidence-based medical basis for patients with late complications of CRII.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopy-Assisted Transanal Endoscopy Rectosigmoid Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT01340755
Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer
NCT05943444
Multivisceral Radical Resection for Surgical T4b Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score-matched Study Comparing the the Laparoscopic and Open Approaches
NCT05707598
Multicenter Study on Suprapubic Catheterization Versus Transurethral Catheterization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
NCT02728427
Transverse Colostomy for Refractory Hemorrhagic Chronic Radiation Proctitis: a Prospective Cohort Study
NCT03397901
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
With the advances of surgical techniques and perioperative care, the morbidity and mortality of resection surgery has been decreased significantly. In addition, previous study proved that anastomosis with at least one end of bowel without radiation damage can greatly reduce postoperative anastomotic leakage rate and mortality. And in Bacon surgery, primary anastomosis is not performed, and the anastomotic tension markedly reduced and the blood supply of anastomosis can be judged intuitively to improve the quality of anastomosis in the second stage of intestinal anastomosis to decrease the anastomotic leakage rate. Combining the advantages of proximally extended resection and two-stage anastomosis could minimize potential complications and maximize the therapeutic efficacy in theory, and a small sample prospective clinical study by the investigator have already preliminarily confirmed it. And the investigator has also preliminarily proved that Parks surgery is safe and feasible for the treatment of late complications of CRII.
Therefore, this study aims to observe the safety and effectiveness of PE-Bacon surgery with Parks surgery as a control, in order to select more optimal surgical methods and provide a high-level evidence-based medical basis for patients with late complications of CRII.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Parks surgery group
The CRII patients received Parks surgery
Parks surgery
Parks surgery
PE-Bacon surgery group
The CRII patients received PE-Bacon surgery
PE-Bacon surgery
PE-Bacon surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Parks surgery
Parks surgery
PE-Bacon surgery
PE-Bacon surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 2\. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) physical condition score of 0-2;
* 3\. Patients with previous pathological diagnosis of pelvic tumors (Gynecology, prostate, urinary system);
* 4\. Patients with a history of pelvic radiotherapy, at least 6 months from the end of the last radiotherapy;
* 5\. Patients without recurrence or metastasis of primary tumor;
* 6\. The late complications of CRII patients, such as deep rectal ulcer (VRS score \>=3), rectal sigmoid colon stenosis, obstruction, chronic perforation, rectal necrosis, rectovaginal fistula, intractable anal pain caused by rectal lesions, intractable rectal bleeding which is still difficult to be relieved by stoma operation, and patients who need sigmoid colorectal resection;
* 7\. Patients who can tolerate general anesthesia;
* 8\. The subjects and their families are able to understand the study plan, willing to participate and sign the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* 2\. Patients with severe pelvic adhesion and frozen pelvis;
* 3\. Patients with unstable primary tumor or tumor in other parts;
* 4\. Patients who need to undergo combined organ resection;
* 5\. Patients with a history of sigmoidostomy;
* 6\. American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) level IV to V;
* 7\. Patients with serious mental illness;
* 8\. Pregnant or lactating women;
* 9\. Patients with serious cardiovascular disease, uncontrollable infection, or other uncontrollable combined diseases.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Delaney G, Jacob S, Featherstone C, Barton M. The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer. 2005 Sep 15;104(6):1129-37. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21324.
Andreyev J. Gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy: a new understanding to improve management of symptomatic patients. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Nov;8(11):1007-17. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70341-8.
Perrakis N, Athanassiou E, Vamvakopoulou D, Kyriazi M, Kappos H, Vamvakopoulos NC, Nomikos I. Practical approaches to effective management of intestinal radiation injury: benefit of resectional surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep 21;17(35):4013-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i35.4013.
McCrone LF, Neary PM, Larkin J, McCormick P, Mehigan B. The surgical management of radiation proctopathy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Aug;32(8):1099-1108. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2803-y. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
Zhong Q, Yuan Z, Ma T, Wang H, Qin Q, Chu L, Wang J, Wang L. Restorative resection of radiation rectovaginal fistula can better relieve anorectal symptoms than colostomy only. World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Feb 2;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1100-0.
Meissner K. Late radiogenic small bowel damage: guidelines for the general surgeon. Dig Surg. 1999;16(3):169-74. doi: 10.1159/000018721.
Qin Q, Zhu Y, Wu P, Fan X, Huang Y, Huang B, Wang J, Wang L. Radiation-induced injury on surgical margins: a clue to anastomotic leakage after rectal-cancer resection with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy? Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019 Apr;7(2):98-106. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goy042. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
He Y, Zhou Z, Huang X, Guan Q, Qin Q, Zhu M, Wang H, Zhong Q, Chen D, Wang H, Fang L, Ma T. Laparoscopic Proximally Extended Colorectal Resection With Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis for Late Complications of Chronic Radiation Proctopathy. Front Surg. 2022 Apr 25;9:845148. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.845148. eCollection 2022.
Anseline PF, Lavery IC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Weakley FL. Radiation injury of the rectum: evaluation of surgical treatment. Ann Surg. 1981 Dec;194(6):716-24. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198112000-00010.
Jao SW, Beart RW Jr, Gunderson LL. Surgical treatment of radiation injuries of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg. 1986 Feb;151(2):272-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90086-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PE-Bacon2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.