Pilot Study for Evaluation of the Need for Protective Ileostomy After Low Anterior Resection Due to Rectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00457327

Last Updated: 2008-06-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-07-31

Study Completion Date

2007-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether protective ileostomy is required after low anterior resection due to rectal cancer

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Since introduction of total mesorectal excision prognosis and quality of life of patients with rectal cancer of the middle or lower third of the rectum could be improved significantly. There is no valid data about the need of protective ileostomy in these patients. About 10% of the patients develop insufficiency of the anastomosis and might benefit from ileostomy whereas about 90% would not have required protective ileostomy retrospectively. Aim of the study is to show that protective ileostomy is not required if several criteria are fulfilled and early measures in case of clinical impairment are defined. Therefore eligibility criteria include safely performed stapler anastomosis with complete rings and control of impermeability by air insufflation. In the event of clinical impairment in the postoperative course CT scan with KM filling of the rectum to exclude insufficiency of the anastomosis will be performed. In case of insufficiency protective ileostomy will be created. 40 patients will be included.

Comparison: Patients with resectable rectal cancer of the middle or lower third will be intraoperatively randomized to either protective ileostomy or no ileostomy at all.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

protective ileostomy rectal cancer low anterior resection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

protective ileostomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* radical resectable rectal cancer
* low sphincter-preserving resection of carcinomas of the lower and middle third
* preoperative normal continence
* preoperative normal sphincter function
* complete rings after stapler anastomosis
* impermeability of anastomosis for air
* written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* reduced cooperation or drug abuse
* pregnancy
* psychosis
* age under 18 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Heidelberg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Markus W Buchler, Chairman

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Medical School

Peter Kienle, Consultant

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinical Study Center Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ulrich AB, Seiler C, Rahbari N, Weitz J, Buchler MW. Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Mar;52(3):412-8. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318197e1b1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19333040 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.sdgc.de/

Study Center of the German Surgical Society

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

433/2005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id