Safety Study of Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02117557

Last Updated: 2014-04-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

198 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-30

Study Completion Date

2022-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

* Compared with traditional open colectomy, laparoscopic surgery is associated with less pain, earlier recovery, and better cosmetic outcome, and its short- and long-term oncologic outcomes have been demonstrated.
* In experienced surgeons' hands, single incision laparoscopic surgery is increasingly performed for colorectal disease, and even for malignant lesion because of its reduced incision-associated morbidity and scarring.
* However, the safety and efficacy of single incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer has not yet been evaluated. Thus, the prospective randomized trial comparing single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is needed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single incision laparoscopic surgery

Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic surgery will be performed for patients in this group.And addition of only one trocar through the stoma for drainage tube is allowed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Single incision laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional laparoscopic surgery

Conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer will be performed for patients in this group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single incision laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SILS CLS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years \< age \< 80 years
* Tumor located in rectosigmoid (defined as 10- to 30-cm from the anal verge)
* Pathological rectosigmoid carcinoma
* Preoperative T stage ranging from T1 to T4a according to the 7th Edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
* Tumor size of 5 cm or less; 6) ECOG score is 0-1
* ASA socre is Ⅰ-Ⅲ
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Body mass index (BMI) \>30 kg/m2
* Pregnant woman or lactating woman
* Severe mental disease
* Previous abdominal surgery
* Emergency operation due to complication (bleeding, perforation or obstruction) caused by colorectal cancer
* Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Guoxin Li

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Guoxin Li

M.D., Ph.D.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Guoxin Li, M.D., PH.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Guoxin Li, M.D., PH.D.

Role: CONTACT

+86-138-0277-1450

Yanan Wang, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

+86-150-1875-3181

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Guoxin Li, M.D.,PH.D.

Role: primary

+86-138-0277-1450

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single-port access laparoscopic radical left colectomy in humans. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Oct;52(10):1797-801. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181b551ce.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19966617 (View on PubMed)

Gash KJ, Goede AC, Chambers W, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is feasible in complex colorectal resections and could enable day case colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):835-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1275-8. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20734083 (View on PubMed)

Lim SW, Kim HJ, Kim CH, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR. Umbilical incision laparoscopic colectomy with one additional port for colorectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Apr;17(2):193-9. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0900-z. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22991135 (View on PubMed)

Hirano Y, Hattori M, Douden K, Shimizu S, Sato Y, Maeda K, Hashizume Y. Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer as a reduced port surgery. Scand J Surg. 2012;101(4):283-6. doi: 10.1177/145749691210100411.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23238505 (View on PubMed)

Zhang X, Yuan H, Tan Z, Li G, Xu Z, Zhou J, Fu J, Wu M, Xi J, Wang Y. Long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 7;23(1):1204. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11500-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38062421 (View on PubMed)

Wang Y, Deng H, Mou T, Li J, Liu H, Zhou H, Li G. Short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):840-848. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6350-6. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30006846 (View on PubMed)

Wang Y, Liu R, Zhang Z, Xue Q, Yan J, Yu J, Liu H, Zhao L, Mou T, Deng H, Li G. A safety study of transumbilical single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Nov 30;16:539. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1067-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26620555 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NFGS-SILS-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.