Prospective Registration Study of Totally Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery

NCT ID: NCT04853784

Last Updated: 2021-04-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

650 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-01

Study Completion Date

2023-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a comparison of totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted colon cancer resection, a prospective registration study comparing the safety and benefits of the two operations

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China. With the advancement of medical science and technology, the treatment of colorectal cancer has become more mature, forming a comprehensive and individualized treatment model focusing on surgery. The promotion of the principles of TME and CME surgery has greatly standardized the operation of colorectal surgery. COLOR II, COREAN and CLASICC studies have all confirmed the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

In traditional laparoscopic-assisted surgery, a small incision in the abdominal wall is used to assist in trimming the mesangium to remove the specimen, and the anastomosis is completed outside the abdominal wall, which will still cause postoperative incision pain and may lead to complications such as incisional infection and incisional hernia. However, in some obese patients, the mesangium is thick and short. The above operations are more difficult, and may even cause the risk of mesangial tears and bleeding, which will weaken the minimally invasive advantages of laparoscopic surgery.

The total laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer is performed under laparoscopic free dissection and dissected reconstruction of the operation area. The small incision of the abdominal wall Trocar is used to take out the specimen, which not only guarantees a sufficient range of dissection and resection, but also avoids the troubles caused by the auxiliary abdominal wall incision. Postoperative recovery may be faster, but it also raises questions about the increased risk of infection in the surgical area. Total laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer still lacks corresponding high-quality clinical research. In response to this problem, this study compares related surgical methods, verifies the safety and effectiveness of the corresponding surgical methods, and provides better guidance for subsequent clinical practice.

Taking laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of colon cancer as a control, the short-term and long-term effects of full laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer were evaluated, so as to choose a more effective and safe operation method.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colon Cancer Surgery Totally Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Anastomosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Totally laparoscopic colon surgery

Totally laparoscopic colon surgery/intracorporeal anastomosis

intracorporeal anastomosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

intracorporeal anastomosis

Laparoscopic-assited colon surgery

Laparoscopic-assited colon surgery/extracorporeal anastomosis

intracorporeal anastomosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

intracorporeal anastomosis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intracorporeal anastomosis

intracorporeal anastomosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

extracorporeal anastomosis

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age: 18-80 years old, male or female;
2. Colon cancer (ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon) is diagnosed by histology or cytology;
3. The clinical stage is T1-4aN0-2M0; 4 No multiple distant metastases;

5\. ECOG score 0-2; 6. Heart, lung, liver, and kidney functions can tolerate surgery; 7. Patients and their families can understand and are willing to participate in this clinical study, and sign an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Past history of malignant colorectal tumors or recent diagnosis combined with other malignant tumors;
2. Patients with intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, intestinal bleeding, etc. who need emergency surgery;
3. Neighboring organs need to be combined with organ resection;
4. New adjuvant therapy before surgery;
5. ASA grade ≥ grade IV and/or ECOG physical status score\> 2 points;
6. Those who have severe liver and kidney function, cardiopulmonary function, blood coagulation dysfunction, or combined with serious underlying diseases that cannot tolerate surgery;
7. History of severe mental illness;
8. Pregnant or lactating women;
9. Patients with other clinical and laboratory conditions considered by the investigator should not participate in the trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The First Hospital of Jilin University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Quan Wang

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jilin University First Hospital

Changchun, Jilin, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Quan Wang, Prof.

Role: CONTACT

15843073207

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STARS-CC01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.