Robotic vs Laparoscopic D3-D4 Lymphadenectomy for Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05961423

Last Updated: 2023-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

286 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-19

Study Completion Date

2024-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Approximately one third of patients with colorectal cancer are diagnosed as locally advanced stage with metastasis to N3 - N4 lymph nodes requiring a D3 - D4 lymphadenectomy. Our previous study has indicated that, by laparoscopic approach, the extended abdomino-iliac lymphadenectomy, the so-called D3-D4 lymph node dissection, could be performed with quick convalescence and similar oncologic efficacy for the treatment of advanced recto-sigmoid cancer with metastatic lesions over N3-N4 lymph nodes, as compared with traditional open surgery. In the present study, the investigators will further compare the oncologic and functional outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic approach in performing such challenging surgical procedures for patients with advanced colorectal cancer requiring a D3-D4 lymphadenectomy through a randomized prospective clinical trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Approximately one third of patients with colorectal cancer are diagnosed as locally advanced stage with metastasis to N3 - N4 lymph nodes requiring a D3 - D4 lymphadenectomy. Our previous study has indicated that, by laparoscopic approach, the extended abdomino-iliac lymphadenectomy, the so-called D3-D4 lymph node dissection, could be performed with quick convalescence and similar oncologic efficacy for the treatment of advanced recto-sigmoid cancer with metastatic lesions over N3-N4 lymph nodes, as compared with traditional open surgery. In the present study, the investigators will further compare the oncologic and functional outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic approach in performing such challenging surgical procedures for patients with advanced colorectal cancer requiring a D3-D4 lymphadenectomy through a randomized prospective clinical trial.

In the upcoming three years (2020/4/1-2023/3/31),consecutive recto-sigmoid cancer patients with metastasis to para- aortic lymph node will be screened and randomized to patient groups undergoing either robotic or laparoscopic D3-D4 lymph node dissection. The extent of D4 lymph node dissection includes extirpation of the extra-mesenteric lymphatic basin along bilateral common iliac arteries and veins, inferior vena cava, and abdominal aorta upward to the level just below the duodenal third portion and left renal vein, besides the traditional mesenteric dissection of paracolic (N1) lymph nodes, intermediate (N2) mesenteric lymph nodes, and lymph nodes around the root of inferior mesenteric artery (N3). The harvested lymph nodes were mapped and managed according to the Japanese guidelines. The metrics of surgical outcomes included: the number of harvested lymph nodes; time to recurrence of cancer after surgery; the length of operation time; blood loss; intra-operative and post-operative complications; and wound size. Functional recovery was evaluated by length of post-operative flatus passage, the restoration of urinary function, hospitalization, and degree of post-operative pain. A subjective-response standardized questionnaire was given to patients to assess disability, which included the number of days until return to partial activity, full activity, and work.

Since the current randomized prospective study in this field is still lack of, the investigators believe that this study will be of academic importance. And, clinically, the presented study can to help set up the standard operation procedures for such patient, and provide the level one evidence for National Health Insurance Administration in evaluating the reimbursement of HTA (high technology assessment) procedures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Control group: laparoscopic surgery Interventional group: robotic surgery
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

No masking

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparoscopic surgery

The patients will undergoing laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of locally advanced colorectal cancer

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Robotic group

The patients will undergoing robotic surgery for the treatment of locally advanced colorectal cancer

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Robotic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patient group undergoing robotic surgery for the treatment of locally advanced colorectal cancer

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic surgery

The patient group undergoing robotic surgery for the treatment of locally advanced colorectal cancer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histopathologically proved adenocarcinoma located at upper rectum (above pelvic peritoneal reflection), recto-sigmoid junction, or distal sigmoid colon (generally 10 to 25 cm above anal verge). Only recto-sigmoid cancers above the peritoneal reflection were investigated because the lymphatic drainage of upper rectum and distal sigmoid colon was along the inferior mesenteric artery to the para-aortic area, and therefore the extent of surgical resection and lymph node mapping were standardized.
* Clinically TNM stage III cancers.
* Curative robotic or laparoscopic surgery.
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class I to III patients.
* Age between 50 and 75 years. This was because patients \>50 years old are generally deemed to be over the reproductive age, and the D3 dissection was considered too aggressive for patients older than 75 years.
* Patients who are willing to receive minimally invasive surgical procedures to treat their rectosigmoid cancer.

Exclusion Criteria

* Tumors located at other anatomic positions;
* Emergency or palliative surgery;
* Evidence of disseminated disease or adjacent organ invasion;
* Primary tumor mass ≥8 cm in diameter;
* Morbidly obese patients (body mass index ≥40 kg/m2);
* Previous major surgery of lower abdomen.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

National Taiwan University Clinical Trial Center

Division of colorectal surgery, department of surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jin-Tung LIANG, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jin-Tung LIANG

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jin-Tung LIANG, PhD

Role: CONTACT

886-9-72651432

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jin-Tung LIANG, PhD

Role: primary

886-9-72651432

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202002011RINB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.