Robotic vs Laparoscopic D3-D4 Lymphadenectomy for Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT05961423
Last Updated: 2023-08-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
286 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-19
2024-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robotic Versus Laparoscopy NOSE for Stage I-III Left-sided Colon Cancer
NCT05970133
Robotic Top-down Intersphincteric Resection
NCT05961969
Comparison of Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: … A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00155727
The Intraoperative Technical Errors of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Radical Right Hemiclectomy
NCT07138859
Prospective Registration Study of Robtic Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery
NCT04843189
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the upcoming three years (2020/4/1-2023/3/31),consecutive recto-sigmoid cancer patients with metastasis to para- aortic lymph node will be screened and randomized to patient groups undergoing either robotic or laparoscopic D3-D4 lymph node dissection. The extent of D4 lymph node dissection includes extirpation of the extra-mesenteric lymphatic basin along bilateral common iliac arteries and veins, inferior vena cava, and abdominal aorta upward to the level just below the duodenal third portion and left renal vein, besides the traditional mesenteric dissection of paracolic (N1) lymph nodes, intermediate (N2) mesenteric lymph nodes, and lymph nodes around the root of inferior mesenteric artery (N3). The harvested lymph nodes were mapped and managed according to the Japanese guidelines. The metrics of surgical outcomes included: the number of harvested lymph nodes; time to recurrence of cancer after surgery; the length of operation time; blood loss; intra-operative and post-operative complications; and wound size. Functional recovery was evaluated by length of post-operative flatus passage, the restoration of urinary function, hospitalization, and degree of post-operative pain. A subjective-response standardized questionnaire was given to patients to assess disability, which included the number of days until return to partial activity, full activity, and work.
Since the current randomized prospective study in this field is still lack of, the investigators believe that this study will be of academic importance. And, clinically, the presented study can to help set up the standard operation procedures for such patient, and provide the level one evidence for National Health Insurance Administration in evaluating the reimbursement of HTA (high technology assessment) procedures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Laparoscopic surgery
The patients will undergoing laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of locally advanced colorectal cancer
No interventions assigned to this group
Robotic group
The patients will undergoing robotic surgery for the treatment of locally advanced colorectal cancer
Robotic surgery
The patient group undergoing robotic surgery for the treatment of locally advanced colorectal cancer
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robotic surgery
The patient group undergoing robotic surgery for the treatment of locally advanced colorectal cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinically TNM stage III cancers.
* Curative robotic or laparoscopic surgery.
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class I to III patients.
* Age between 50 and 75 years. This was because patients \>50 years old are generally deemed to be over the reproductive age, and the D3 dissection was considered too aggressive for patients older than 75 years.
* Patients who are willing to receive minimally invasive surgical procedures to treat their rectosigmoid cancer.
Exclusion Criteria
* Emergency or palliative surgery;
* Evidence of disseminated disease or adjacent organ invasion;
* Primary tumor mass ≥8 cm in diameter;
* Morbidly obese patients (body mass index ≥40 kg/m2);
* Previous major surgery of lower abdomen.
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
National Taiwan University Clinical Trial Center
Division of colorectal surgery, department of surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jin-Tung LIANG, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
National Taiwan University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jin-Tung LIANG
Taipei, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202002011RINB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.