Value of MRCP+ And Liver Multiscan in the Management of Dominant Strictures in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
NCT ID: NCT05359497
Last Updated: 2022-05-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-05-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this study is to assess the (i) ability of MRCP+ to detect change in biliary volume, (ii) reproducibility of MRCP+ and LMS, and (iii) correlation of MRCP+ with ERC findings as gold standard.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Application of Annual Liver Multiscan and MRCP+ in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
NCT05462093
Disease Status in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis by Elastography
NCT02446665
Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Biliary Disease: Health Economics Study
NCT04015310
Non-invasive Diffusion-weighted Imaging With MRCP in the Diagnosis of Neoplastic Biliary Obstruction
NCT07108725
Repeatability and Reproducibility of Quantitative MRCP
NCT03809559
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Images will be coded and analysed by Perspectum to retrieve MRCP+ and LMS results.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Additional sequences and extra MRI
PSC patients, suspected for having a dominant stenosis, that undergo additional LMS sequences next to standard care MRI prior to ERCP and an additional MRI/MRCP with additional LMS sequences 8 weeks after ERCP.
MRI images will be analysed by the post-processing tool called MRCP+ and Liver Multiscan, which are performed after the MRI is performed.
Liver Multiscan sequences baseline
Additional Liver Multiscan sequences at baseline besides standard care MRI liver /MRCP prior to ERCP.
MRCP+ analysis baseline
Post processing tool (Software) for quantifying MRCP images after MRCP is performed. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.
Liver Multiscan analysis baseline
Post processing tool (Software) for determining the corrected T1 time after the additional LMS sequences at baseline are performed. This cT1 reflects the activity of inflammation/fibrosis of the liver. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.
MRI liver with MRCP
An extra MRI liver with contrast and MRCP is performed 8 weeks after the ERCP following standard care protocol
Liver Multiscan sequences follow-up
Additional Liver Multiscan sequences are performed at 8 weeks after ERCP.
MRCP+ analysis follow up
Post processing tool (Software) for quantifying MRCP images after the MRCP from follow up is performed. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.
Liver Multiscan analysis follow up
Post processing tool (Software) for determining the corrected T1 time after the additional LMS sequences from the follow up scan are performed. This cT1 reflects the activity of inflammation/fibrosis of the liver. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Liver Multiscan sequences baseline
Additional Liver Multiscan sequences at baseline besides standard care MRI liver /MRCP prior to ERCP.
MRCP+ analysis baseline
Post processing tool (Software) for quantifying MRCP images after MRCP is performed. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.
Liver Multiscan analysis baseline
Post processing tool (Software) for determining the corrected T1 time after the additional LMS sequences at baseline are performed. This cT1 reflects the activity of inflammation/fibrosis of the liver. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.
MRI liver with MRCP
An extra MRI liver with contrast and MRCP is performed 8 weeks after the ERCP following standard care protocol
Liver Multiscan sequences follow-up
Additional Liver Multiscan sequences are performed at 8 weeks after ERCP.
MRCP+ analysis follow up
Post processing tool (Software) for quantifying MRCP images after the MRCP from follow up is performed. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.
Liver Multiscan analysis follow up
Post processing tool (Software) for determining the corrected T1 time after the additional LMS sequences from the follow up scan are performed. This cT1 reflects the activity of inflammation/fibrosis of the liver. Patient involvement is not necessary during this procedure.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 18
* Able to give informed consent
* Clinically suspicious for a dominant stricture
Exclusion Criteria
* known allergy for MRI contrast agents
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Perspectum
INDUSTRY
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
C.Y. Ponsioen
Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cyriel Ponsioen, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ponsioen CY, Arnelo U, Bergquist A, Rauws EA, Paulsen V, Cantu P, Parzanese I, De Vries EM, van Munster KN, Said K, Chazouilleres O, Desaint B, Kemgang A, Farkkila M, Van der Merwe S, Van Steenbergen W, Marschall HU, Stotzer PO, Thorburn D, Pereira SP, Aabakken L. No Superiority of Stents vs Balloon Dilatation for Dominant Strictures in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):752-759.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.034. Epub 2018 May 24.
Lazaridis KN, LaRusso NF. Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 22;375(12):1161-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1506330. No abstract available.
Zheng HH, Jiang XL. Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis of 16 observational studies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;28(4):383-90. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000576.
Barner-Rasmussen N, Pukkala E, Jussila A, Farkkila M. Epidemiology, risk of malignancy and patient survival in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a population-based study in Finland. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;55(1):74-81. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1707277. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
Boonstra K, Weersma RK, van Erpecum KJ, Rauws EA, Spanier BW, Poen AC, van Nieuwkerk KM, Drenth JP, Witteman BJ, Tuynman HA, Naber AH, Kingma PJ, van Buuren HR, van Hoek B, Vleggaar FP, van Geloven N, Beuers U, Ponsioen CY; EpiPSCPBC Study Group. Population-based epidemiology, malignancy risk, and outcome of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2013 Dec;58(6):2045-55. doi: 10.1002/hep.26565. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
Hirschfield GM, Karlsen TH, Lindor KD, Adams DH. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Lancet. 2013 Nov 9;382(9904):1587-99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60096-3. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
Ponsioen CY, Chapman RW, Chazouilleres O, Hirschfield GM, Karlsen TH, Lohse AW, Pinzani M, Schrumpf E, Trauner M, Gores GJ. Surrogate endpoints for clinical trials in primary sclerosing cholangitis: Review and results from an International PSC Study Group consensus process. Hepatology. 2016 Apr;63(4):1357-67. doi: 10.1002/hep.28256. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
Ponsioen CY, Reitsma JB, Boberg KM, Aabakken L, Rauws EA, Schrumpf E. Validation of a cholangiographic prognostic model in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy. 2010 Sep;42(9):742-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255527. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Harrison ME; American College of Gastroenterology. ACG Clinical Guideline: Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;110(5):646-59; quiz 660. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.112. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2009 Aug;51(2):237-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 Jun 6. No abstract available.
Berstad AE, Aabakken L, Smith HJ, Aasen S, Boberg KM, Schrumpf E. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Apr;4(4):514-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2005.10.007.
Dave M, Elmunzer BJ, Dwamena BA, Higgins PD. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 2010 Aug;256(2):387-96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091953.
Lunder AK, Hov JR, Borthne A, Gleditsch J, Johannesen G, Tveit K, Viktil E, Henriksen M, Hovde O, Huppertz-Hauss G, Hoie O, Hoivik ML, Monstad I, Solberg IC, Jahnsen J, Karlsen TH, Moum B, Vatn M, Negard A. Prevalence of Sclerosing Cholangitis Detected by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography in Patients With Long-term Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterology. 2016 Oct;151(4):660-669.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.06.021. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
Zenouzi R, Welle CL, Venkatesh SK, Schramm C, Eaton JE. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis-Current State and Future Directions. Semin Liver Dis. 2019 Jul;39(3):369-380. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1687853. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
Goldfinger MH, Ridgway GR, Ferreira C, Langford CR, Cheng L, Kazimianec A, Borghetto A, Wright TG, Woodward G, Hassanali N, Nicholls RC, Simpson H, Waddell T, Vikal S, Mavar M, Rymell S, Wigley I, Jacobs J, Kelly M, Banerjee R, Brady JM. Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort-Derived Normative Ranges. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Sep;52(3):807-820. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27113. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
Banerjee R, Pavlides M, Tunnicliffe EM, Piechnik SK, Sarania N, Philips R, Collier JD, Booth JC, Schneider JE, Wang LM, Delaney DW, Fleming KA, Robson MD, Barnes E, Neubauer S. Multiparametric magnetic resonance for the non-invasive diagnosis of liver disease. J Hepatol. 2014 Jan;60(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
Pavlides M, Banerjee R, Tunnicliffe EM, Kelly C, Collier J, Wang LM, Fleming KA, Cobbold JF, Robson MD, Neubauer S, Barnes E. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease severity. Liver Int. 2017 Jul;37(7):1065-1073. doi: 10.1111/liv.13284. Epub 2017 May 30.
Bradley CR, Cox EF, Scott RA, James MW, Kaye P, Aithal GP, Francis ST, Guha IN. Multi-organ assessment of compensated cirrhosis patients using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. J Hepatol. 2018 Nov;69(5):1015-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.037. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
Selvaraj EA, Culver EL, Coller J. Combination of quantitative MRCP and MRI demonstrates increased periductal iron-corrected T1 in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut. 2021;70:A155
Ponsioen CY, Assis DN, Boberg KM, Bowlus CL, Deneau M, Thorburn D, Aabakken L, Farkkila M, Petersen B, Rupp C, Hubscher SG; PSC Study Group. Defining Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Results From an International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Study Group Consensus Process. Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1764-1775.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.046. Epub 2021 Aug 10. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MALD study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.