Performance of Imaging for the Diagnosis of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (< 3 cm)on Cirrhosis

NCT ID: NCT00848952

Last Updated: 2010-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

450 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate 3 imaging techniques and their associations : MRI, CTscanner and enhanced contrast ultrasound for the diagnosis of small (\< 3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma for patients with cirrhosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

With the improvement of cirrhosis complications coverage, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tend to become the main cause of mortality for cirrhotic patients. Currently, the incidence of the HCC increase in occidental country and hid global prognostic remain very bad. The main indication factor for a curative treatment is the size lesion.

Cirrhosis is the main risk factor for HCC occurence. In France, HCC screening has been establish for cirrhotic patients with hepatic ultrasound and alfa-fetoprotein measurement with the aim of detected HCC when the size allows a curative treatment.

When a nodule is discovered during the follow-up, HCC diagnosis is done following the recommendations of European Association for the Study of the Liver (AESL) in 2000, updated by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD)in 2005. Diagnostic is function of nodule feature on one or two enhanced imaging techniques among CTscanner, MRI and enhanced contrast ultrasound.

This diagnostic strategy raises several questions. First, neither the most efficient dynamic imaging association for nodules from 1 to 2 cm, nor the most efficient imaging examination for nodules from 2 to 3 cm are known. Second, only few studies have been carried out about imaging semiology of the small hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, the imprecisions of the present recommendations regarding the choice of the best examination technique and the difficulties in the diagnosis of benign or malignant nature for small nodule can lead to a bad management of these patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3 imaging techniques are done

all patients have : MRI, CTscanner, enhanced contrast ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age \> 18 hears
* presence of one or several nodules \< 3 cm
* known or suspected cirrhosis

Exclusion Criteria

* psychiatric disease
* contraindication to one of the 3 imaging examinations (CTscanner, MRI, enhanced contrast ultrasound
* patient already treated by chemoembolization
* recurrence on the coagulation zone of a nodule already treated by per-cutaneous tumour destruction
* presence of a tumour (\> 3 cm) associated to the nodule
* pregnant woman or breast-feeding woman
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Angers

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University Hospital Angers

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint-André

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Chu

Caen, , France

Site Status

hôpital Beaujon

Clichy, , France

Site Status

hôpital Henri Mondor

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Du Bocage

Dijon, , France

Site Status

CHU

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Hôpital de la croix rousse

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Hôpital E. Herriot

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint Éloi

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Brabois

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Hôtel Dieu

Nantes, , France

Site Status

hôpital archet II

Nice, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint Antoine

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Haut-Lévèque

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Pontchaillou

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Nord

Saint-Etienne, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Paul Brousse

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Institut Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Christophe Aube, professor

Role: CONTACT

33-(0)2-41-35-42-81

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Aubé Christophe

Role: primary

Trillaud

Role: primary

Le Pennec

Role: primary

Vilgrain

Role: primary

Luciani

Role: primary

Krause

Role: primary

Bricault

Role: primary

Rode

Role: primary

Pilleul

Role: primary

Gallix

Role: primary

Laurent

Role: primary

Dupas

Role: primary

Chevallier

Role: primary

Lewin

Role: primary

Drouillard

Role: primary

Olivie

Role: primary

Cuilleron

Role: primary

Bellin

Role: primary

Dromain

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Paisant A, Vilgrain V, Riou J, Oberti F, Sutter O, Laurent V, Rodes A, Guiu B, Cassinotto C, Trillaud H, Bricault I, Michalak S, Bruno O, Ronot M, Aube C. Comparison of extracellular and hepatobiliary MR contrast agents for the diagnosis of small HCCs. J Hepatol. 2020 May;72(5):937-945. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.12.011. Epub 2019 Dec 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31870951 (View on PubMed)

Aube C, Oberti F, Lonjon J, Pageaux G, Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Rode A, Radenne S, Cassinotto C, Vergniol J, Bricault I, Leroy V, Ronot M, Castera L, Michalak S, Esvan M, Vilgrain V; CHIC Group. EASL and AASLD recommendations for the diagnosis of HCC to the test of daily practice. Liver Int. 2017 Oct;37(10):1515-1525. doi: 10.1111/liv.13429. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28346737 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PHRC 2008-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.