Effect of Implant Driver Facilitated Micro-osteo Perforation on the Rate of Tooth Movement.
NCT ID: NCT05339620
Last Updated: 2022-04-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-07
2022-03-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Of En-Masse Retraction With Two-Step Retraction Using Mini-Implant As Anchorage
NCT05963438
"Osseodensification Efficacy on Molar Septum Expansion in Immediate Molar Implant Placement
NCT07108361
Implant Insertion Torque and Primary Stability
NCT03222219
Clinical Evaluation Of Dental Implants Stability Placed In Healed Bony Sites Following Over-drilling Compared To Conventional-Drilling Protocol
NCT03250949
Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Implant Stability of Hybrid Versus Resorbable Blast Media (RBM) Surfaces Using Resonance Frequency Analysis
NCT06620315
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After 3 months of extraction of upper first premolar ( according to planned orthodontic treatment), 3 microosteoperforation will be done with implant in an implant driver distal to canine. Surgical procedure will be done in local anesthesia, no flap will be raised. Alginate impressions will be taken before the procedure and 28 days after canine retraction has started, to measure the difference between rate of canine retraction on both sides. Measurement was done by a digital vernier caliper,
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
mop group
a group of patients with a class 2 divsion 1 dental malocclusion, overjet greater than 9 mm, extraction of upper first premolars planned, and it has been 3 months post extraction and before canine retraction is commenced.
implant driver facilitated micro-osteoperforations
3 micro-osteoperforations(in a vertical pattern) are done on the randomly allocated experimental side , distal to canine under local anesthesia. the other side of the mouth is used as a control.
alginate impression is taken before the intervention .
mop group ( same)
a group of patients with a class 2 divsion 1 dental malocclusion, overjet greater than 9 mm, extraction of upper first premolars planned, and it has been 3 months post extraction and before canine retraction is commenced.
implant driver facilitated micro-osteoperforations
3 micro-osteoperforations(in a vertical pattern) are done on the randomly allocated experimental side , distal to canine under local anesthesia. the other side of the mouth is used as a control.
alginate impression is taken before the intervention .
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
implant driver facilitated micro-osteoperforations
3 micro-osteoperforations(in a vertical pattern) are done on the randomly allocated experimental side , distal to canine under local anesthesia. the other side of the mouth is used as a control.
alginate impression is taken before the intervention .
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18- 45 years
* Class 2 div 1
* No systemic disease
* No radiographic evidence of bone loss
* No history of periodontal therapy
* No current active periodontal disease
* No smoking
* No gingivitis or untreated caries
* Probing depth \< 4mm in all teeth
* Gingival index \< 1mm
* Plaque index \< 1mm
Exclusion Criteria
* Poor oral hygiene for more than 2 visits.
* Extreme skeletal class 2 malocclusion, overjet \> 10mm, anb\> 7
* Systemic disease
* Evidence of bone loss
* Past periodontal disease
* Current periodontal disease
* Smoking
* Gingivitis and caries
* Probing depth \> 4mm
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bahria University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
DR MARIA HABIB
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bahria University Medical and Dental College
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cheung T, Park J, Lee D, Kim C, Olson J, Javadi S, Lawson G, McCabe J, Moon W, Ting K, Hong C. Ability of mini-implant-facilitated micro-osteoperforations to accelerate tooth movement in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Dec;150(6):958-967. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.030.
Ozkan TH, Arici S. The effect of different micro-osteoperforation depths on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A single-center, single-blind, randomized clinical trial. Korean J Orthod. 2021 May 25;51(3):157-165. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.3.157.
Aboalnaga AA, Salah Fayed MM, El-Ashmawi NA, Soliman SA. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Prog Orthod. 2019 Jun 3;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0274-0.
Bolat Gumus E, Kinsiz E. Effects of miniscrew-facilitated micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement : A split-mouth, randomized controlled trial. J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Apr;84(Suppl 2):104-110. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00371-6. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ERC 05/2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.