Comparison Of En-Masse Retraction With Two-Step Retraction Using Mini-Implant As Anchorage

NCT ID: NCT05963438

Last Updated: 2025-09-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-10

Study Completion Date

2024-06-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This Randomized Control Trial will be conducted to compare the effects of en-masse retraction to two- steps retraction on sagittal, vertical and dental dimensions using mini-implant as anchorage.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Extractions of teeth are the commonest approach in treating orthodontic problems. There is several extraction protocol commonly employed in the orthodontic correction of class II malocclusion ranging from the extraction of two premolars (20.2%) to four premolars (42.9%).

Retraction of anterior teeth followed by the extraction of premolars requires anchorage to restrict the mesial movement of posterior teeth. Anchorage control is a major factor in achieving successful orthodontic treatment and it can be achieved by variety of appliances, of which titanium screws have been considered as an absolute source of anchorage in orthodontics treatment. The anchorage reinforced from mini-implant is helpful in minimizing anchorage loss and accepted heavy traction forces.

Retraction of anterior teeth can be achieved either by en-masse retraction, moving all the six anterior teeth together in a single step or by two-step retraction, separately retract canines in first step followed by retracting the four anteriors in the second step.

This Randomized Control Trial will be conducted to compare the effects of en-masse retraction to two- steps retraction on sagittal, vertical and dental dimensions using mini-implant as anchorage. 80 patients will be included in this study after meeting the eligibility criteria. Each group will contain 40 patients.

The patients will be divided in two groups i.e. two-step retraction group (control group) and en-masse group (experimental group), through software generated randomization table.

Two-step retraction group (control group) In this group, immediately after placement of mini-implant and extractions of upper first premolars, heavy ligation will be done from mini-implant to maxillary second premolar and first molar. Canine will be retracted by sliding mechanics and the four anterior teeth will be retracted by loop mechanics. Loops will be activated every three weeks by 1 mm.

Retraction will be stopped when canines establish class I relationship and a good incisor relationship will be obtained in both the groups

En-masse retraction group(experimental group) After placement of mini-implants and extraction of maxillary first premolar, rectangular stainless steel arch wire with anterior 8mm height crimpable hooks distal to the lateral incisors will be inserted and force will be applied using elastic chains attached between the mini-implant and the hooks for conducting en-masse retraction. Elastic chains will replace after every three weeks.

Pretreatment lateral cepalogram will be taken at time of enrolment (T1) and post-treatment lateral cephalogram taken after 12 months of orthodontic treatment (T2). All cephalometric radiograph will be traced on acetate tracing sheets 0.5 μm in thickness using a sharp 4H pencil on a view box using transilluminated light in a dark room.

The analysis will be done on pretreatment cephalogram (T1) and post treatment lateral cephalogram (T2) and then their measurements will be compared to find out changes in the sagittal, vertical and dental dimensions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

En-masse Retraction to Two- Steps Retraction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Two-step retraction group (control group)

In this group, immediately after placement of mini-implant and extractions of upper first premolars, heavy ligation will be done from mini-implant to maxillary second premolar and first molar. Canine will be retracted by sliding mechanics and the four anterior teeth will be retracted by loop mechanics. Loops will be activated every three weeks by 1 mm.

Group Type OTHER

anterior retraction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After placement of mini-implants and extraction of maxillary first premolar, retraction of anterior either simultaneously or separately depending on the allocated group will be done

En-masse retraction group(experimental group)

After placement of mini-implants and extraction of maxillary first premolar, rectangular stainless steel arch wire with anterior 8mm height crimpable hooks distal to the lateral incisors will be inserted and force will be applied using elastic chains attached between the mini-implant and the hooks for conducting en-masse retraction. Elastic chains will replace after every three weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

anterior retraction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After placement of mini-implants and extraction of maxillary first premolar, retraction of anterior either simultaneously or separately depending on the allocated group will be done

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

anterior retraction

After placement of mini-implants and extraction of maxillary first premolar, retraction of anterior either simultaneously or separately depending on the allocated group will be done

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. Both male and female patients with age of 18- 25 years. 2. Cases treated with upper first premolars extractions. 3. Cases having class II molar relation which is mesiobuccal cusp of maxillary first permanent molar occludes anterior to the buccal groove of mandibular first molar on both sides as assessed clinically.

4\. Overjet \> 5mm and \< 12mm as assessed clinically. 5. Cases with no remaining growth as assessed by cervical vertebrae maturation stages (cvm) ≥4 on lateral cephalometric radiograph .

6\. Cases with no congenitally missing teeth (excluding third molars).

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\. Long term use of systemic corticosteroids, calcium channel blockers \& anti-inflammatory drugs.

2\. Cases with syndromes like cleft lip and palate as assessed clinically. 3. Cases in which active growth is still taking place as assessed by cervical vertebrae maturation stages (cvm) ≤ 3 on lateral cephalometric radiograph.

4\. Radiographic evidence of bone loss. 5. Periodontal disease as assessed clinically.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dow University of Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anam Sattar

Senior Registrar

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anam Sattar, FCPS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dow University of Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dow University of Health Sciences

Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2681

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.