Retentive Strength of Denture Adhesives on Various RR Ridges
NCT ID: NCT05063422
Last Updated: 2024-04-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-18
2023-08-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To evaluate the effect of various denture adhesives on efficiency of complete dentures in patients with different alveolar ridges.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing the Color Stability of Acrylic Denture Teeth in Different Staining Solutions
NCT06074952
The Effect of Platelet Rich Fibrin Layers on Peri-implant Tissue Phenotype
NCT07033351
Surface Treatment of the Dental Implant on the Osseointegration
NCT05194813
Comparison of Flexural Strength and Flexural Modulus of Conventional and Graphene-Reinforced Polymethyl Methacrylate
NCT06856239
Multicenter Study of Denture Adhesive
NCT01712802
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* As per protocol all patients presenting will be examined in general opd and those patients in need of rehabilitation of their missing teeth will be referred to Prosthodontics dept.
* Patients will undergo history and complete oral examination after informed consent (Annexure-B). On the basis of these information the patient will be selected for the study acc to exclusion and inclusion criteria.
* The patients will then categorized into three groups based on clinical and radiographic features of ridges according to Wical-Swoope classification.
* A well-constructed denture will be fabricated and all the post op complaints will be resolved.
* Three forms of denture adhesives will be used including powder, cream and strips for all three resorption classes as described by Wical-Swoope.
* A digital spring scale will be used to record the reading , All the measurements will be recorded in grams
* Retentive strength will be recorded first before application of the adhesives for baseline retention strength.
* Patient with denture in his mouth will be instructed to maintain max non-forced intercuspation for fives minutes. Atfer that with mouth opened and lower lip relaxed in order to avoid losing peripheral seal tip of the spring scale will be placed at the margin of denture in recess to lingual frenum. Traction forced will be then applied until denture is detached, the max retention force being recorded by sping scale. This procedure will be repeated thrice and mean value will be calculated.
* A second reading will be recorded after application of adhesive in similar manner
* Mean increase in denture retention strength will be calculated by subtracting denture retention strength without adhesive from denture retentive strength with adhesive for both study products
* The scores calculated will be filled in Performa (annexure-A)
* The obtained data will be then used to compare diff form of commercially availble denture adhesives (pastes, powder and cushion) for their mean increase in retention strength.
* Then patient will be instructed about how to apply denture adhesives (based on manufacturer' instructions)
* The patient will fill out two attributed questionnaires, before and 1 week after using the denture adhesive. In the questionnaire the satisfaction rating will be determined using valid questionnaires with seven evaluation items: general satisfaction, ability to speak, ease of cleaning, stability, retention, comfort and mastication performance (VAS? Likert scale?)
* The quantitative variable, age of the patients and retention strength was presented as mean+- SD. The qualitative varaible like sex was presented as frequency and percentages. T-test was used to determine the existence if difference of mean retention strength b/w the two form of denture adhesives.
* Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Chi-square tests in SPSS software version 25 software (SPSS version 25.0, SPSS Inc; Chicago, IL, USA) (P\<.05)
The score calculated will be filled in the performa (Annexure-A)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mild Resorption of mandibular ridge
Loss of upto 1/3 of original vertical height
polymyxin b/trimethoprim ophthalmic, Carboxymethyl cellulose
3 forms of denture adhesives from each brands are used to compare the retentive strength on highly resorbed ridges
Moderate Resorption of mandibular ridge
2\. Moderate Resorption: Loss of upto 1/3 to 2/3 of original vertical height
polymyxin b/trimethoprim ophthalmic, Carboxymethyl cellulose
3 forms of denture adhesives from each brands are used to compare the retentive strength on highly resorbed ridges
Severe Resorption of mandibular ridge
3\. Severe Resorption: Loss of 2/3 or more of original vertical height
polymyxin b/trimethoprim ophthalmic, Carboxymethyl cellulose
3 forms of denture adhesives from each brands are used to compare the retentive strength on highly resorbed ridges
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
polymyxin b/trimethoprim ophthalmic, Carboxymethyl cellulose
3 forms of denture adhesives from each brands are used to compare the retentive strength on highly resorbed ridges
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Healing period of at least 2 months after extraction.
Exclusion Criteria
* Use of metallic base denture
* Xerostomia
* Ill-fitting dentures
* Neuromuscular disorder
* Smoking habits
* Debilitating diseases
* Immunocompromised
* Maxillofacial defects
* Use a tissue conditioner
40 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Maria Shakoor
Asistant Professor (BDS, FCPS)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Altamash Institute of dental medicine
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ahmed N, Abbasi MS, Salahuddin A, Tariq L, Siraj S, Das G, Suleman G, Vohra F, Heboyan A. Comparative Analysis of Adhesive Retention and Denture Weight in Different Residual Ridge Morphologies: A Cross-Over Randomized-Controlled Trial. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Feb;11(1):e70118. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70118.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Denture adhesive
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.