The 3-Dimensional Printed Guide in Endodontic Microsurgery
NCT ID: NCT05283252
Last Updated: 2023-09-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
26 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-15
2023-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is necessary and crucial in planning for endodontic surgery, but the procedure still depends on how the surgeon reflect the 3D images on the anatomical structures accurately, which may leave room for error.
This study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes using guided endodontic microsurgery versus conventional endodontic microsurgery in critical anatomical structures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
3D-printed Endocrowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Pulpally-treated Primary Molars
NCT04909827
Assessment of the Accuracy of Surgical Guide Designed From Digital Impression, Dental Model Scanning Using CBCT and Desktop Scanner in Computer Guided Implantology:
NCT03730506
Broken Instrument Removal
NCT05128266
Survival and Success of CAD/CAM Restorations After 5 Years of Intraoral Use
NCT07276269
Remineralization of Caries Affected Dentin
NCT04262076
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Major advances have been made to the techniques used in endodontic surgery to make the procedure easier to perform, safer and more predictable.
Several case reports that used surgical guide in endodontic microsurgery found that the procedure was more accurate in control of depth, diameter and angle of osteotomy.
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes using guided endodontic microsurgery versus conventional endodontic microsurgery in critical anatomical structures.
Patients will be selected that they are indicated for endodontic surgery. Upper and lower teeth will be selected close to critical anatomy such as; maxillary sinus, nasal fossa, mental foramen and mandibular canal. medical and dental history will be obtained from all selected patients. Patients will be randomly distributed to either guided micro-surgery group or conventional micro-surgery group. All steps of the surgical procedure will be performed under microscopic magnification. Bioceramic putty will be used as a root-end filling material. Post-surgical instructions will be given to patients. The time of the surgery will be recorded from the first incision to the last suturing. Success and failure will be assessed using radiographic and clinical evaluation at 6 and 12 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Guided Endodontic Micro-Surgery
Use of the 3-D printed guide in endodontic micro-surgery
3-D printed Guide
Guided Endodontic micro-surgery
Conventional Endodontic Micro-Surgery
Free-hand endodontic micro-surgery
Conventional Endodontic Micro-Surgery
Free-hand endodontic micro-surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
3-D printed Guide
Guided Endodontic micro-surgery
Conventional Endodontic Micro-Surgery
Free-hand endodontic micro-surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with age ranging between 18-50 years.
* Posterior/anterior teeth close to critical anatomical structures that indicated for endodontic surgery.
* Patients' acceptance to participate in the trail.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with Serious systemic disease incompatible with surgery.
* Pregnant female patients.
* Teeth with periapical pathosis associated with vertical root fracture.
* Non-restorable teeth.
* Teeth with periodontal probe more than 5 mm.
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Damascus University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rami Kaddoura, DDS,MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Damascus University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Damascus University
Damascus, , Syria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Buniag AG, Pratt AM, Ray JJ. Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery: A Retrospective Outcomes Assessment of 24 Cases. J Endod. 2021 May;47(5):762-769. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Lio F, Mampieri G, Mazzetti V, Leggeri A, Arcuri L. Guided endodontic microsurgery in apicoectomy: a review. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021 May-Jun;35(3 Suppl. 1):47-55. doi: 10.23812/21-3supp1-7.
Popowicz W, Palatynska-Ulatowska A, Kohli MR. Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery: Computed Tomography-based Guided Stent Approach with Platelet-rich Fibrin Graft: A Report of 2 Cases. J Endod. 2019 Dec;45(12):1535-1542. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
Monaghan L, Jadun S, Darcey J. Endodontic microsurgery. Part one: diagnosis, patient selection and prognoses. Br Dent J. 2019 Jun;226(12):940-948. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0415-3.
Antal M, Nagy E, Braunitzer G, Frater M, Piffko J. Accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series. Head Face Med. 2019 Dec 21;15(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13005-019-0214-8.
Giacomino CM, Ray JJ, Wealleans JA. Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery: A Novel Approach to Anatomically Challenging Scenarios Using 3-dimensional-printed Guides and Trephine Burs-A Report of 3 Cases. J Endod. 2018 Apr;44(4):671-677. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.019. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
Strbac GD, Schnappauf A, Giannis K, Moritz A, Ulm C. Guided Modern Endodontic Surgery: A Novel Approach for Guided Osteotomy and Root Resection. J Endod. 2017 Mar;43(3):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.001. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UDDS-Endo-01-2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.