Brain Connectivity Patterns in Chronic Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
NCT ID: NCT05068908
Last Updated: 2025-09-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
95 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-03-02
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EEG-characteristics of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Chronic Pain
NCT05261243
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Facial Pain
NCT02633306
FMRI Study on DC/TMD Patients
NCT07259902
Sensorimotor Cortex Excitability in Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
NCT05627986
Activating Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Synchronized MEG-EEG Recordings of Epilepsy Patients With Non-Diagnostic EEG
NCT00071370
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Endogenous pain modulation can be assessed by psychophysical methods. For instance, pain facilitation can be assessed with temporal summation of pain (TSP) using brief noxious stimuli presented repeatedly over peripheral tissues at \>0.3 Hz. Pain inhibition can be assessed with conditioned pain modulation (CPM) by presenting noxious stimuli over a body site during concurrent noxious stimuli elsewhere to induce pain inhibition. Neuroimaging studies in pain-free controls showed that functional connectivity within thalamocortical and antinociceptive brain circuits are related to increased TSP and reduced CPM responses, respectively. It is unknown if connectivity patterns within the thalamocortical and antinociceptive brain circuits are altered in chronic TMD patients, reflecting endogenous pain modulation dysfunction. Corticolimbic pathways connecting the mPFC, amygdala and nucleus accumbens are thought to play a key role in chronic pain and specifically, in emotion-driven modulation of nociceptive signals. Recently a longitudinal study showed that functional and structural connectivity patterns determined from neuroimaging data between these regions predict transition from acute to chronic back pain. A population study of TMD pain patients showed that approximately 64% of these patients also present with comorbid low back pain, thus it is possible that chronic TMD pain patients may display brain connectivity patterns that are similar to those identified in persistent back pain patients.
Functional brain connectivity is usually assessed from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), where participants lay at rest during fMRI scans to measure intrinsic functional connectivity (FC). Connectivity patterns within the thalamocortical, corticolimbic and antinociceptive circuits described above were determined using this traditional approach for FC assessment. Recent studies departed from this traditional approach and assessed FC during presentation of noxious stimuli during fMRI data acquisition and identified evoked FC changes. These studies' results suggest that noxious stimuli affect connectivity patterns in brain circuits involved in pain processing in pain-free participants and in fibromyalgia patients. Thus, it is reasonable that psychophysical testing for pain facilitation (e.g., TSP) and pain inhibition (e.g., CPM) could reflect changes in connectivity patterns within brain circuits associated with pain modulation. If confirmed, these evoked connectivity patterns identified from engaging endogenous pain modulation could serve as a "signature" for pain modulation in individuals, similar to a "functional connectome fingerprinting" demonstrated to predict fluid intelligence in healthy participants using data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP).
Taken together these results suggest new approaches to investigate dysregulation of brain circuits in chronic TMD pain with a focus on brain connectivity, that can serve as unique chronic pain "signatures" related to endogenous pain modulation function. There is a critical need to determine the potential of brain circuits' connectivity patterns to serve as signatures for pain- related disability. Addressing this critical need will provide novel ways to identify subgroups of chronic TMD pain patients who respond poorly to treatment. Closing this gap in our knowledge has reasonable potential to provide the opportunity for development of precise and valid brain imaging methods supporting refined phenotyping of chronic TMD pain patients leading to early identification of patients with poor prognosis.
Chronic pain causes suffering to more Americans than heart disease, diabetes and cancer combined, and TMD is the second most commonly occurring musculoskeletal condition resulting in pain and disability after chronic back pain. TMD affects approximately 5-12% of the population, with annual estimates of economic impact ranging between $4 billion per the NIDCR and $32 billion according to a study sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . Pain-related disability significantly impacts patient's quality of life, and a subgroup of chronic TMD pain patients present with high pain-related disability, as identified by the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), and these patients have poor prognoses - even with treatment - and greater health care costs.
About half to two-thirds of individuals with TMD seek treatment, and of those approximately 15% will develop chronic pain. Chronic TMD pain patients present with pain persisting ≥6 months, and it is well accepted that chronic TMD pain pathophysiology includes dysregulation of brain circuits. Recent evidence suggests that brain functional and anatomical characteristics, namely connectivity patterns within specific brain circuits, are related to processing, modulation and persistence of pain. Brain connectivity patterns within the thalamocortical circuit are associated with expression of endogenous pain facilitation, while connectivity patterns between prefrontal cortex and brainstem nuclei, an antinociceptive circuit, are related to endogenous pain inhibition. In addition, brain connectivity patterns within corticolimbic pathways involved in the emotion-driven modulation of nociceptive signals predict transition from acute to chronic back pain. These connectivity patterns within thalamocortical, antinociceptive, and corticolimbic brain circuits have not been described in chronic TMD patients, and it is unknown if connectivity patterns within these brain circuits can distinguish chronic TMD patients based on pain-related disability.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low-impact chronic painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD) cases
Participants whose chronic painful TMD is determined to be low-impact. Visits include a standardized clinical examination using the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) protocol, psychosocial questionnaires completion, sensory and endogenous pain modulation (EPM) testing and a multi-modal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data acquisition.
No interventions assigned to this group
High- impact chronic painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD) cases
Participants whose chronic painful TMD is determined to be high-impact. Visits include a standardized clinical examination using the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) protocol, psychosocial questionnaires completion, sensory and endogenous pain modulation (EPM) testing and a multi-modal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data acquisition.
No interventions assigned to this group
Pain-free controls
Participants without chronic painful TMD. Visits include a standardized clinical examination using the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) protocol, psychosocial questionnaires completion, sensory and endogenous pain modulation (EPM) testing and a multi-modal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data acquisition.
No interventions assigned to this group
Pilot study-MRI optimization group
A pilot study will be conducted separately from the "main project" for optimization of MRI parameters, where up to five participants will be recruited as a separate group to undergo only MRI sessions (single study visit). The goal is to optimize the parameters of the main project's MR imaging protocol in order to minimize imaging distortions related to the presence of the thermodes in close proximity to the field of view for the brain.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of study participation.
* All participants will be females (biological sex by self-report) between ages 18 to 65 years (inclusive), as this includes the majority of the patient population at risk for chronic TMD pain.
* Cases and controls will be matched for age within ±3 years, and all participants must be able to understand commands in English to follow study procedures (e.g., during sensory testing).
Pain-free controls
* TMD-Pain screener score less than 3 out of 7 (Screener available as part of the DC/TMD)
* No previous diagnosis for the most common pain-related TMD as defined in the DC/TMD criteria (myalgia, arthralgia, headache attributed to TMD)
* No significant orofacial pain (jaw pain, TMJ pain) in past 3 months ("significant" meaning 5 or more days in any month or any pain during the past month)
* No report of significant pain in the last 3 months elsewhere in the body ("significant" meaning 5 or more days in any month or any pain during the past month), e.g., low back pain, fibromyalgia, migraine headaches
* Not meeting any of the most common pain-related TMD diagnosis as described in the DC/TMD criteria (myalgia, arthralgia, headache attributed to TMD) upon clinical examination following the DC/TMD protocol
Chronic painful TMD cases
* TMD-pain screener score equal to or greater than 3
* Primary TMD caseness criteria: myalgia (masticatory muscle pain) based on clinical exam following the DC/TMD protocol
* Concurrent arthralgia (TMJ pain) and/or headache attributed to TMD allowed
* Myofascial pain must meet the following criteria:
* Onset \>3 months, occurring \>15 days/month on average for \>3 months
* Minimum 10 jaw pain episodes since onset, each episode lasting at least 30 minutes and no less than 2 hours within the day, OR unremitting
* Low-impact TMD pain cases: Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) grade IIa or lower
* High-impact TMD pain cases: GCPS grade IIb or greater
* Be age 18-65 (inclusive)
* Provide a signed and dated informed consent form.
* Be willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of study participation.
* Be able to understand commands in English to follow study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of pain related to dental or periodontal pathology
* Currently undergoing active orthodontic treatment
* Pregnant or nursing
* Has any of the following medical conditions by self-report:
* Renal failure or dialysis
* Heart disease (examples: uncontrolled arrhythmia or hypertension, cardiomyopathy) or heart failure
* Non-allergic bronchospasm (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema)
* Diabetes (Type I or II) that is not controlled with medication or diet
* Hyperthyroidism
* Uncontrolled seizures
* Used any injection therapy (i.e. tender or trigger point injections, steroid injections), acupuncture, biofeedback, or TENS for the management of facial pain within 2 weeks prior to the screening assessment
* If undergoing botulinum toxin injections in the head and neck areas, must be 3 months since last set of injections and refrain from this treatment until study has ended
* History of major depression or other major psychiatric disorder requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months prior to the screening assessments
* History of treatment for drug or alcohol abuse within the last 12 months
* Current pain medication use (e.g. opioids, ibuprofen, acetaminophen) that cannot be stopped \<24 hours prior to each study visit
* Other conditions/diseases associated with altered pain perception: neurological or developmental disorders (dementia, autism spectrum disorder), neoplasm, multiple sclerosis, trigeminal neuralgia
* MRA contraindications including claustrophobia
* GCPS grade assigned at Visit 1 that does not match grade from screening GCPS (low-, high-impact pain) and it is not possible to assign the potential participant to the correct final group, due to the latter having met their recruitment quota
* Strictly left-handedness by self-report
* Thermal threshold for Pain-50 (determined at Visit 1) is outside the temperature range of 40-49 degrees Celsius
* Lack of access to electronic device with internet connection during the study
* Inability or unwillingness to receive daily text messages during the study
* Inability to complete at least four daily ratings between the Informed consent, Pre- visit 1 procedures and in-person visit 1
* Anything that would place the individual at increased risk or preclude the individual's full compliance with study procedures or completion of the study.
Pregnant or nursing;
* MRI contraindications including claustrophobia;
* Adults lacking capacity to provide informed consent for themselves;
* Unable to understand instructions for sensory testing in English;
* Anything that would place the individual at increased risk or preclude the individual's full compliance with study procedures or completion of the study.
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Minnesota
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Estephan J Moana-Filho, DDS, MS, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Minnesota
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DENT-2020-29282
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.