A Comparison of Quality of Life Between MAlone Procedure and Percutaneaous Endoscopic Caecostomy in Patients With Antegrade Colonic Enema

NCT ID: NCT05040139

Last Updated: 2021-09-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

103 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-13

Study Completion Date

2019-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Antegrade colonic enema (ACE) is a second intent treatment of severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence following the failure of medical treatment. ACE is classically administered through a percutaneous access to the caecum performed surgically according to the Malone procedure (MP). Recently, a novel endoscopic approach named Percutaneous Endoscopic Caecostomy (PEC) has been proposed to perform the percutaneous access to the caecum. PEC has never been compared to the traditional MP in terms of postoperative quality of life and functional outcomes.

Objective: The aim of the study is to compare postoperative quality of life between MP and PEC in patients treated with ACE for severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence.

Hypothesis: MP and PEC achieve similar quality of life outcomes. Methods: All patients from two prospective databases who underwent MP or PEC for severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence between 2006 and 2016 will be included. They will be contacted to answer questionnaires about quality of life (GIQLI) and functional outcomes including constipation, fecal incontinence and body image assessment (KESS, Wexner and BIQ scores respectively). The main measured outcome will be GIQLI score.

Results: The results of this comparative study will determine if the endoscopic and the surgical approaches are similar in terms of quality of life, or if one of them is better than the other. This study will clarify the optimal protocol to perform a caecal percutaneous access before ACE administration in patients suffering from severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Antegrade colonic enema (ACE) is a second intent treatment of severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence following the failure of medical treatment. ACE is classically administered through a percutaneous access to the caecum performed surgically according to the Malone procedure (MP). Recently, a novel endoscopic approach named Percutaneous Endoscopic Caecostomy (PEC) has been proposed to perform the percutaneous access to the caecum. PEC has never been compared to the traditional MP in terms of postoperative quality of life and functional outcomes.

Objective: The aim of the study is to compare postoperative quality of life between MP and PEC in patients treated with ACE for severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence.

Hypothesis: MP and PEC achieve similar quality of life outcomes. Study design: All patients from two prospective databases who underwent MP or PEC for severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence between 2006 and 2016 will be included. They will be contacted by mail to answer questionnaires about quality of life (GIQLI) and functional outcomes including constipation, fecal incontinence and body image assessment (KESS, Wexner and BIQ scores respectively). Patients who did not answer to the mail will be phoned. The collection of patients' answers will be conducted over a 3 months period.

Main outcome measures: Quality of life evaluated by the GIQLI score. Secondary outcomes measures: Functional outcomes including constipation severity (measured by the KESS score), fecal incontinence severity (measured by the Wexner score), body image impairment (measured by the BIQ score).

Results: The results of this comparative study will determine if the endoscopic and the surgical approaches are similar in terms of quality of life, or if one of them is better than the other. This study will clarify the optimal protocol to perform a caecal percutaneous access before ACE administration in patients suffering from severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Constipation Aggravated Fecal Incontinence With Fecal Urgency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Malone procedure

The percutaneous caecal access is performed surgically

Malone Procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical procedure performed to obtain a percutaneous caecal access for the administration of antegrade colonic enemas. Briefly, the procedure is performed under general anesthesia. The surgeon bring the end of the appendix (or a tubulized segment of the ileum) out through the abdominal wall. The appendix is opened and sutured to the abdominal skin.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Caecostomy

The percutaneous caecal acces is performed endoscopically.

Percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic procedure performed to obtain a percutaneous caecal access for the administration of antegrade colonic enemas. Briefly, a coloscopy is performed to reach the caecum. The cutaneous location of the caecostomy is determined by transillumination of the caecum. A caecopexy is performed with 3 anchors at the chosen location. A specific pig-tail catheter (Chait catheter) is placed percutaneously into the caecum in the center of the 3 anchors.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Malone Procedure

Surgical procedure performed to obtain a percutaneous caecal access for the administration of antegrade colonic enemas. Briefly, the procedure is performed under general anesthesia. The surgeon bring the end of the appendix (or a tubulized segment of the ileum) out through the abdominal wall. The appendix is opened and sutured to the abdominal skin.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy

Endoscopic procedure performed to obtain a percutaneous caecal access for the administration of antegrade colonic enemas. Briefly, a coloscopy is performed to reach the caecum. The cutaneous location of the caecostomy is determined by transillumination of the caecum. A caecopexy is performed with 3 anchors at the chosen location. A specific pig-tail catheter (Chait catheter) is placed percutaneously into the caecum in the center of the 3 anchors.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Severe constipation and/or severe incontinence refractory to medical treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Malone procedure or percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy between 2006 and 2016
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nantes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emilie Duchalais, PH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nantes University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Nantes

Nantes, Loire-Atlantique, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RC17_0080

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.