Lactulose vs. Polyethylene Glycol as Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Adults

NCT ID: NCT05726344

Last Updated: 2023-12-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-10

Study Completion Date

2023-12-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Colonoscopy is the gold standard in bowel assessment when there is suspicion of colon and rectum pathology. Bowel cleansing is necessary to ensure an optimal visualization of colonic mucosa, allowing this form of detection and removal of polyps. Nowadays international recommendations have multiple bowel preparations. There are differences among them regarding adherence, tolerance and adverse effects. Lactulose (LAC) is widely used in treating constipation. However, there are some randomized clinical assays using LAC as bowel preparation with excellent results according to bowel preparation and tolerance scales. Adherence to bowel preparation significantly affects the result in the endoscopic study.

Safety of polyethylene glycol (PEG) formulations has been validated in several studies, it presents little severe side effects and the advantage of its applicability to patients with several comorbidities (heart, liver and kidney without water deprivation). However, its main disadvantage lies in the need to ingest large amounts of liquid (3-4L), generating intolerance thereto in 15%-45% of patients.

Bowel cleansing preparation with PEG is widely used in clinical practice. Considering that according to international studies reporting better tolerance and adherence with LAC; it is suggested to compare the level of bowel preparation, tolerance and adherence between two groups with LAC and PEG.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lactulose Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy Bisacodyl

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

An analytical, experimental, prospective study, specifically a triple blind randomized clinical assay (endoscopist, researchers and statistician) in which a bowel preparation is compared for colonoscopy with lactulose vs. Polyethylene Glycol.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Triple blind (endoscopist, researchers and statistician) randomized clinical assay.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lactulose group

Patients participating in the study shall go on with their usual diet prior to colonoscopy. Three days before avoid consuming fruits, vegetables, seeds and cereals. A low residue soft and liquid diet is allowed.

The day before the study, the group receiving lactulose shall take 4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) the day before the study at 6pm. Then, at 8pm a bottle of 250 mL (162.5g lactulose) of lactulose shall be dissolved in 600 mL of water and all contents (850 mL) shall be taken in 2 hours. At 10pm they have to drink 2 liters still water.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lactulose

Intervention Type DRUG

4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) + 250 mL (162.5g lactulose) of lactulose + 600 mL of water + 2 L of water

Polyethylene glycol group

Patients participating in the study shall go on with their usual diet prior to colonoscopy. Three days before avoid consuming fruits, vegetables, seeds and cereals. A low residue soft and liquid diet is allowed.

The day before the study, the group receiving polyethylene glycol (PEG) should take 4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) at 4pm. Then, at 6pm, 3 bottles of PEG (Polyethylene glycol 3350 60 g; sodium chloride 1.46 g; potassium chloride 745 mg; Sodium bicarbonate 1.68 g; anhydrous sodium sulfate 5.68 g; pineapple flavoring 483 mg) shall be dissolved in 3 liters of water (1 bottle per liter) and they shall take half the preparation, that is 1 liter and a half in 2 hours. At 10pm they shall take the remaining contents in 2 hours.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Polyethylene Glycol 3350

Intervention Type DRUG

4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) + 3 bottles Polyethylene Glycol 3350 (Polyethylene glycol 3350 60 g; sodium chloride 1.46 g; potassium chloride 745 mg; Sodium bicarbonate 1.68 g; anhydrous sodium sulfate 5.68 g; pineapple flavoring 483 mg) + 3 L of water

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lactulose

4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) + 250 mL (162.5g lactulose) of lactulose + 600 mL of water + 2 L of water

Intervention Type DRUG

Polyethylene Glycol 3350

4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) + 3 bottles Polyethylene Glycol 3350 (Polyethylene glycol 3350 60 g; sodium chloride 1.46 g; potassium chloride 745 mg; Sodium bicarbonate 1.68 g; anhydrous sodium sulfate 5.68 g; pineapple flavoring 483 mg) + 3 L of water

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bisacodyl 20 mg Water 600 mL Bisacodyl 20 mg Water 3 L

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Patients over 18 years with no bowel surgical procedures

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients willingly deciding not to enter into the study
* Pregnant women
* Patient with colonic resections and/or ileostomies
* Inflammatory bowel disease
* Colonic optimization by prior colonoscopy with poor preparation
* Suspected intestinal occlusion or perforation, intussusception
* Patient with melenas
* Oral iron intake in the past 10 days
* Emergency colonoscopy
* Hypersensitivity to any of the components comprised in preparations.
* Diabetics
* Chronic kidney disease in dialysis
* Uncorrected severe dystonias
* Severe psychiatric illness (schizophrenia)
* Low IQ to understand bowel preparation
* Severe constipation (\< 1 weekly stool)
* Chronic diarrhea with high rate (≥ 4 daily evenly loose consistency stools for more than 4 weeks)
* Unbalanced heart diseases (ischemic cardiopathology, congestive heart failure, unstable angina, arrhythmias and untreatable high blood pressure)
* Ascites
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital de Clínicas Dr. Manuel Quintela

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ignacio Moratorio

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

IGNACIO MORATORIO, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

HOSPITAL DE CLINICAS

MARIA B RUSSO, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

HOSPITAL DE CLINICAS

FLORENCIA RODRIGUEZ, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

HOSPITAL DE CLINICAS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital de Clinicas

Montevideo, , Uruguay

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Uruguay

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

7477252

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id