Prucaloprida vs Bisacodyl as a Stimulant in Bowel Preparation for Video Colonoscopy in Adults
NCT ID: NCT07127237
Last Updated: 2025-08-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
EARLY_PHASE1
124 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-30
2026-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Is prucalopride superior or equivalent to bisacodyl as a stimulant agent for bowel cleansing preparation before colonoscopy? Is the tolerability of prucalopride better, equivalent, or worse compared to bisacodyl? The investigators will compare the standard bowel cleansing preparation using polyethylene glycol (PEG) in combination with either bisacodyl or prucalopride as the stimulant agent.
Participants will be randomized into two groups, both receiving the same base preparation with different stimulant agents.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study Comparing Picoprep With Mannitol and Bisacodyl for Colon Cleansing in Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT02386449
Efficacy of Prucalopride Plus Polyethylene Glycol in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT02781493
Efficacy and Safety Study of Prucalopride to Treat Chronic Constipation
NCT00488137
Efficacy and Safety Study of Prucalopride for the Treatment of Elderly Patients With Chronic Constipation
NCT00487422
Evaluation of a Mixed Bowel Prep (2L PEG + Bisacodyl) Versus PEG With Ascorbate
NCT01509131
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients referred to the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of the Gastroenterology Department at the Hospital de Clínicas for colonoscopy (VCC) who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in the study. Referrals will include both hospitalized patients and outpatients from various clinic services.
Statistical Analysis Frequency tables and charts will be used to describe qualitative variables. Measures of central tendency and dispersion (mean ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range \[IQR\]) will be used for continuous variables depending on the distribution assessed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Associations between qualitative variables will be analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test when expected frequencies are less than 5. If a statistically significant association is found, the strength of the association will be expressed using the Relative Risk (RR) and its corresponding 95% Confidence Interval (CI).
Differences between groups in normally distributed continuous variables will be analyzed using the Student's t-test for independent samples, and for non-normally distributed variables, the Mann-Whitney U test will be used.
Adenoma detection rate and cecal intubation rate will be calculated as the number of new cases (detection or cecal intubation) per total number of procedures performed. These rates will be expressed using the appropriate constant K based on the number of patients, along with their 95% CI. The comparison between groups will be performed using a test for comparison of independent proportions. A significance level of α = 0.05 will be established. Statistical analysis will be performed using STATA v.18.0.
Study Variables • Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) Conceptual definition: A scale used to assess bowel cleanliness during colonoscopy.
Operational definition:
Score 0: unprepared colon segment with mucosa not visualized due to solid stool that cannot be cleared.
Score 1: portion of mucosa is seen, but other areas are obscured by staining, residual stool, and/or opaque liquid.
Score 2: minor residual staining or small fragments of stool, but mucosa is adequately visualized.
Score 3: entire mucosa is visible with no residual material. Type and scale: Qualitative, ordinal variable.
Categories:
Total score: 0-9. Adequate preparation: BBPS ≥ 2 in each colonic segment. Inadequate preparation: BBPS \< 2 in any segment.
• Tolerance Conceptual definition: Refers to the presence or absence of specific symptoms during bowel preparation, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain or distension, headache, dizziness, fatigue, palpitations, and rectal bleeding.
Operational definition:
Good tolerance: ≤ 3 symptoms. Moderate tolerance: 4-5 symptoms. Poor tolerance: ≥ 6 symptoms. Type and scale: Qualitative, ordinal variable. Categories: Good, Moderate, Poor.
• Overall Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) Conceptual definition: A quality indicator for colonoscopy. An ADR ≥ 25% is considered acceptable (≥ 30% in men and ≥ 20% in women).
Operational definition: Number of adenomas/adenocarcinomas (confirmed by histology) divided by the total number of colonoscopies performed, multiplied by 100.
Type and scale: Quantitative, continuous variable; ratio scale. Values: 0-100%.
• Overall Cecal Intubation Rate Conceptual definition: A quality indicator for colonoscopy. Considered acceptable if ≥ 95% in screening colonoscopies and ≥ 90% in other types of colonoscopies.
Operational definition: Number of colonoscopies where the ileocecal valve is visualized divided by the total number of colonoscopies performed, multiplied by 100.
Type and scale: Quantitative, continuous variable; ratio scale. Values: 0-100%.
Data Collection Method Patient Recruitment: All patients scheduled for colonoscopy at the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of the Hospital de Clínicas who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate. Informed consent will be obtained after providing detailed explanations and resolving any questions.
Data Collection Tool: Individual standardized forms with closed-ended questions will be completed for each participant. One of the principal investigators will gather the necessary information to complete the baseline data collection form, including demographic data, medical history, and patient-reported experience with bowel preparation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bisacodyl
On the day prior to the procedure, the group receiving bisacodyl will take 4 tablets (5 mg each) at 4:00 PM. Subsequently, at 6:00 PM, they will dissolve 3 sachets of PEG in 3 liters of water (1 sachet per liter) and ingest half of the preparation, that is, 1.5 liters over a period of 2 hours. At 10:00 PM, they will ingest the remaining 1.5 liters over another 2-hour period.
Bisacodyl 5 MG
On the day prior to the procedure, the group receiving bisacodyl will take 4 tablets (5 mg each) at 4:00 PM. Subsequently, at 6:00 PM, they will dissolve 3 sachets of PEG in 3 liters of water (1 sachet per liter) and ingest half of the preparation, that is, 1.5 liters over a period of 2 hours. At 10:00 PM, they will ingest the remaining 1.5 liters over another 2-hour period.
Prucaloprida
On the day prior to the procedure, the group receiving prucalopride will take one 2 mg tablet at 4:00 PM. Subsequently, at 6:00 PM, they will dissolve 3 sachets of PEG in 3 liters of water (1 sachet per liter) and ingest half of the preparation-that is, 1.5 liters over a period of 2 hours. At 10:00 PM, they will ingest the remaining 1.5 liters over another 2-hour period.
Prucalopride 2mg
On the day prior to the procedure, the group receiving prucaloprida will take 1 tablet (2 mg) at 4:00 PM. Subsequently, at 6:00 PM, they will dissolve 3 sachets of PEG in 3 liters of water (1 sachet per liter) and ingest half of the preparation, that is, 1.5 liters over a period of 2 hours. At 10:00 PM, they will ingest the remaining 1.5 liters over another 2-hour period.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bisacodyl 5 MG
On the day prior to the procedure, the group receiving bisacodyl will take 4 tablets (5 mg each) at 4:00 PM. Subsequently, at 6:00 PM, they will dissolve 3 sachets of PEG in 3 liters of water (1 sachet per liter) and ingest half of the preparation, that is, 1.5 liters over a period of 2 hours. At 10:00 PM, they will ingest the remaining 1.5 liters over another 2-hour period.
Prucalopride 2mg
On the day prior to the procedure, the group receiving prucaloprida will take 1 tablet (2 mg) at 4:00 PM. Subsequently, at 6:00 PM, they will dissolve 3 sachets of PEG in 3 liters of water (1 sachet per liter) and ingest half of the preparation, that is, 1.5 liters over a period of 2 hours. At 10:00 PM, they will ingest the remaining 1.5 liters over another 2-hour period.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Without prior colonic surgical interventions.
* Who attend the Digestive Endoscopy service to undergo a colonoscopy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women.
* Patients with rectocolonic resections and/or ileostomies.
* Inflammatory bowel disease.
* Inadequate bowel preparation in a previous colonoscopy.
* Suspected intestinal obstruction or perforation.
* Intestinal intussusception.
* Melena.
* Oral iron intake within the last 10 days.
* Emergency colonoscopies.
* Hypersensitivity to any component of the bowel preparation solutions.
* Chronic kidney disease on dialysis.
* Uncorrected severe electrolyte imbalances.
* Major psychiatric disorders.
* Low intellectual quotient.
* Severe constipation (≤ 1 bowel movement per week).
* Chronic diarrhea with high frequency (≥ 4 daily bowel movements of uniformly decreased consistency for more than 4 weeks).
* Decompensated cardiac diseases (ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, unstable angina, arrhythmias, and uncontrolled hypertension).
* Ascites.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital de Clínicas Dr. Manuel Quintela
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ignacio Moratorio
Principal investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HospitalCDMQ
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.