Comparison Between Asymmetric And Standard Split-Dose Regimen For Bowel Preparation

NCT ID: NCT03146052

Last Updated: 2017-05-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

81 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-27

Study Completion Date

2017-05-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We aimed to compare the efficacy for bowel cleansing of a split-dose regimen with a low morning dose of PEG solution (Asymmetric; 25% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure and 75% of the dose is given on the day before) with the standard split-dose regimen in patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy using a low volume bowel preparation (2L PEG-citrate-simethicone plus Bisacodyl). We enrolled consecutive outpatients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy in a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to: group A, asymmetric split dose regimen (1,5 L of PEG + bisacodyl the day before and 0,5 L 4 hours before colonoscopy); group B, symmetric split dose regimen (1 L of PEG + bisacodyl the day before and 1 L 5 hours before colonoscopy). Primary endpoint was the proportion of adequate bowel cleansing. Moreover, all patients filled in a nurse-administered questionnaire assessing compliance, tolerability and safety of bowel preparation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prospective, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial in adult patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Eligible participants were randomly assigned, according to a computer-generated list with an allocation ratio of 1:1, to receive either asymmetric or symmetric split-dose regimen of a low-volume preparation by investigators who were not involved in the enrolment process. Detailed written instructions were administered to all patients who accepted to participate. A low-fiber diet was prescribed three day before colonoscopy; participants in both groups were instructed to have a light lunch on the day before the colonoscopy and only clear liquid were allowed on the day of the exam. All endoscopic procedures were scheduled between 9:00 AM and 1:00 PM.

The preparation used in the study is a combination of a 2 L sulphate-free iso-osmotic formulation of of PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) (Lovol-esse; AlfaWassermann, Bologna, Italy. Kit contains 4 pouches, each containing 64.5gr of PEG, to be dissolved in 2 L of water.), and bisacodyl 5 mg tablets (Lovodyl; Alfa-Wassermann, Bologna, Italy).

All subjects were instructed to take 4 bisacodyl tablets at 4:00 PM on the day before the procedure. Subjects allocated to the asymmetric split-dose regimen group were invited to consume at 6:00 PM on the evening before the colonoscopy 3 sachets of PEG-CS in 1,5 L of water in a range from 90 to 120 minutes (about 250 mL every 15 min) and 4 hours before the scheduled procedure 1 sachets in 0,5 L of water in a range from 15 to 30 minutes. Subjects allocated to the symmetric split-dose regimen group were invited to consume at 6:00 PM on the evening before the colonoscopy 2 sachets of PEG-CS in 1 L of water in a range from 60 to 90 minutes and 5 hours before the scheduled procedure 2 sachets in 1 L of water in a range from 60 to 90 minutes.

Unblinded investigators collected demographic and clinical data with medical history. All patients filled in a nurse-administered questionnaire to assess compliance, tolerability and safety of bowel preparation.

Blinded experencied endoscopists performed endoscopic procedure in accordance with colonoscopy quality practice. Data on bowel cleansing (evaluated by using Boston Bowel Preparation Scale), endoscopic procedures and findings (i.e. cancer, polyps, diverticula) were collected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Polyps Colon Preparation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Blinded endoscopists performed endoscopic procedure and evaluated colon cleansing.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Asymmetric split dose preparation

75% of the dose is given on the day before of the procedure and 25% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl

Intervention Type DRUG

PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) (Kit contains 4 pouches, each containing 64.5gr of PEG) and bisacodyl 5 mg tablets

Symmetric split dose preparation

50% of the dose is given on the day before of the procedure and 50% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl

Intervention Type DRUG

PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) (Kit contains 4 pouches, each containing 64.5gr of PEG) and bisacodyl 5 mg tablets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl

PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) (Kit contains 4 pouches, each containing 64.5gr of PEG) and bisacodyl 5 mg tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients scheduled as outpatient for screening or surveillance colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* Inpatients
* refusal of split dose regimen for bowel preparation
* previous history of colorectal resection
* severe cardiac disease
* advanced (stage IV and V) chronic kidney disease
* pregnancy; ileus
* suspected bowel obstruction or toxic megacolon
* known inflammatory bowel disease
* known or suspected allergy to PEG.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ASST Rhodense

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

gianpiero manes

Head of the Gastroenterology Unit

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gianpiero Manes

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Lombardia, Italy, 20020

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ASST Rhodense

Garbagnate Milanese, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Andreozzi P, De Nucci G, Bezzio C, Arena I, Devani M, Mandelli E, Morganti D, Omazzi B, Reati R, Redaelli D, Saibeni S, Manes G. Comparison of asymmetric (low morning-dose) and standard split-dose regimen of PEG plus bisacodyl for bowel preparation: A randomized controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Jun;51(6):837-842. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.12.012. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30658942 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

165-032017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.