Efficacy And Tolerability Of Asymmetric Split Regimen For Bowel Preparation

NCT ID: NCT06916689

Last Updated: 2025-04-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

236 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-08

Study Completion Date

2024-10-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators aimed to compare the efficacy for bowel cleansing of a split-dose regimen with a low morning dose of PEG solution (Asymmetric; 25% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure and 75% of the dose is given on the day before) with the standard split-dose regimen in patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy using a very low volume bowel preparation (1L PEG+Ascorbate). Consecutive outpatients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy were enrolled in a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to: group A, asymmetric split dose regimen (0,75 L of PEG + ASC the day before and 0,25 L 2:30 hours before colonoscopy); group B, symmetric split dose regimen (0,5 L of PEG + ASC the day before and 0,5 L 3 hours before colonoscopy). Primary endpoint was the proportion of adequate bowel cleansing. Moreover, all patients filled in a validated, nurse-administered questionnaire assessing compliance, tolerability and safety of bowel preparation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prospective observational, single-blind study conducted in two endoscopy centers belonging to the same Local Health Authority. The two bowel preparation regimens under study (symmetric split and asymmetric split) will be compared in a population of patients undergoing screening for colorectal cancer.

Patient enrollment, product prescription, and the subsequent pre-endoscopic evaluation of safety, tolerability, acceptability, and compliance will be carried out by an assistant who will not be blinded to the type of preparation used.

Endoscopic evaluation, however, will be performed by an experienced endoscopist who will be blinded to the type of bowel preparation administered to the patient.

The bowel preparation product used consists of a very low-volume solution of Macrogol (3350) + Ascorbic Acid (1 liter) (PLENVU®, Norgine).

Bowel cleanliness level assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale adn overall tolerability of bowel preparation are primary outcomes.

Patient compliance and safety; the number of detected lesions, the percentage of complete colonoscopies, the duration of the colonoscopy, the degree of discomfort/pain perceived by the patient during the examination, and procedure-related complications are secondary outcomes.

Patients will be assigned to the two treatment groups according to a computer-generated sequence.

Data will be expressed as mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables and as frequencies for qualitative variables. The comparison between the two groups will be performed using the t-test for quantitative variables and the chi-square (χ²) test for qualitative variables.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colon Preparation Polyps Colorectal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Asymmetric split dose preparation

75% of the dose is given on the day before of the procedure and 25% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

1L PEG-Asc

Intervention Type DRUG

PEG 3350 plus sodium sulfate plus sodium chloride plus potassium chloride plus ascorbic acid plus sodium ascorbate

Symmetric split dose preparation

50% of the dose is given on the day before of the procedure and 50% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

1L PEG-Asc

Intervention Type DRUG

PEG 3350 plus sodium sulfate plus sodium chloride plus potassium chloride plus ascorbic acid plus sodium ascorbate

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

1L PEG-Asc

PEG 3350 plus sodium sulfate plus sodium chloride plus potassium chloride plus ascorbic acid plus sodium ascorbate

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients scheduled as outpatient for screening or surveillance colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* Inpatients
* refusal of split dose regimen for bowel preparation
* previous history of colorectal resection
* severe cardiac disease
* advanced (stage IV and V) chronic kidney disease
* pregnancy; ileus
* suspected bowel obstruction or toxic megacolon
* known inflammatory bowel disease
* known or suspected allergy to PEG.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ASST Rhodense

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

gianpiero manes

Head of the Gastroenterology Unit

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gianpiero Manes

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ASST Rhodense

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ASST Rhodense

Garbagnate Milanese, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

101-17022023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.