Single Dose Versus Split Dose Polyethylene Glycol-based Colonic Lavage for Colonoscopy
NCT ID: NCT01610856
Last Updated: 2012-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-03-31
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral polyethylene glycol lavage given either as a single dose or split dose. The study will be a randomized controlled single blind two group study. The primary study outcomes will be the previously validated Ottawa bowel preparation score.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Low-volume Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT01929590
Efficacy and Safety of Polyethylene Glycol Compared With Sodium Picosulphate for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy
NCT01093274
Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Regimens Prior to Colonoscopy
NCT01649674
Split Dose Pico-Salax + Bisacodyl vs. PEG Split Dose
NCT01415687
Polyethylene Glycol Versus Low Volume Solutions Prior to Colonoscopy
NCT02956057
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients with acute coronary syndrome, congestive heart failure, unstable angina, known or suspected renal failure, ascites, megacolon, known or suspected bowel obstruction, or other comorbidities that may prevent colonoscopy will be excluded. Patients will also be excluded if they previously had partial or subtotal colectomy or if the colonoscopy is warranted for the evaluation of diarrhea.
Enrollment of participants will be performed with block randomizations of 8 stratified by AM versus PM procedure time using a computer-generated table, with allocation concealment maintained through the use of consecutively numbered sealed envelopes. Colonoscopists and investigators will be blinded to allocation groups. Patients will be allocated to one of two groups: (1) 4L PEG day prior to procedure; (2) 4L of PEG split in two 2L doses
A study assistant will assign patients to their group and instruct them on the proper use of their assigned bowel preparation method. Patients will be given a tolerability questionnaire, that was modified from a previously reported questionnaire, to be completed once their bowel preparation is finished and before coming to the hospital for the colonoscopy. Patient concerns or questions regarding the preparation will be directed toward the assistant as opposed to their gastroenterologist, so as to avoid unblinding the gastroenterologist.
Outcomes
The previously validated Ottawa bowel preparation scale80 will be used to assess the quality of bowel cleanliness. Each of the right, mid and rectosigmoid colon is rated on a 5-point scale (0-4). In addition, a complete 3-point rating for overall colonic fluid is assessed resulting in an overall score range of 0 to 14. An excellent preparation with little fluid would score 0 to 1; a good preparation, 2 to 4; while scores higher than 4 would indicate progressively worsening bowel preparations. A completely unprepared colon would score 11 to 14, depending on the amount of colonic fluid.
Colonoscopy will be performed in a standard fashion and endoscopists will rate the bowel-preparation quality during the procedure and record the result on a separate standardized form.
Secondary outcomes will include a previously validated tolerability questionnaire and patient and investigator reported adverse events.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PEG - 4 L
4 Litres PEG bowel preparation given the day prior to colonoscopy with a clear fluid diet
Polyethylene Glycol
4 Litres of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation solution
Split Dose PEG
4 Litres of Colyte given as two split doses of 2L each either the day before colonoscopy 8 hours apart in the case of an AM colonoscopy or in the case of an afternoon colonoscopy given 5PM the day before and 6:00AM the day of the colonoscopy
polyethylene glycol
Polyethylene glycol 4L given in two split doses of 2L each
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Polyethylene Glycol
4 Litres of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation solution
polyethylene glycol
Polyethylene glycol 4L given in two split doses of 2L each
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* congestive heart failure,
* unstable angina,
* known or suspected renal failure,
* ascites,
* megacolon,
* known or suspected bowel obstruction, or
* other comorbidities that may prevent colonoscopy will be excluded. Patients will also be excluded if they previously had partial or subtotal colectomy or if the colonoscopy is warranted for the evaluation of diarrhea.
50 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alaa Rostom
MD MSc FRCPC
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alaa Rostom, MD MSc FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Forzani & MacPhail Colon Cancer Screening Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mohamed R, Hilsden RJ, Dube C, Rostom A. Split-Dose Polyethylene Glycol Is Superior to Single Dose for Colonoscopy Preparation: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:3181459. doi: 10.1155/2016/3181459. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ethics ID 21972
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
21972
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.