Low-volume Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT ID: NCT01929590
Last Updated: 2013-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
180 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-10-31
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The quality of colonic preparation was assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale (13); tolerability (nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain), compliance, sleep disturbance and adverse effects in group 3 were compared with those in groups 1 and 2. The time since the last dose of bowel-preparation agent, the time since the last solid food was consumed, the approximate amount of bowel preparation taken (0%, 25%, 75%, or 100%), and the start time of the colonoscopy were recorded.
Satisfactory colon preparation was considered when scores of the Boston bowel preparation scale were 2/3; otherwise, the procedure was considered unsatisfactory preparation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PEG-3350 group 3
group 3: low-volume 2 L PEG-3350 solution (same day of the procedure 06:00-08:00 am).
PEG-3350 group 3
low-volume 2 L PEG-solution (same day of the procedure 06:00-08:00 am)
PEG-3350 group 1
group 1 single dose (PEG-3350; PEG-4 L the day previous of the study, starting at 17:00 and finishing at 21:00 h)
PEG-3350 group 1
PEG-3350; PEG-4 L the day previous of the study, starting at 17:00 and finishing at 21:00 h
PEG-3350 group 2
group 2: split-dose (PEG-3350 2 L the day before 17:00-19:00 h and 2 L same day of the procedure 06:00-08:00 am)
PEG-3350 group 2
split-dose (PEG-3350; 2 L the day before 17:00-19:00 h and 2 L same day of the procedure 06:00-08:00 am)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PEG-3350 group 2
split-dose (PEG-3350; 2 L the day before 17:00-19:00 h and 2 L same day of the procedure 06:00-08:00 am)
PEG-3350 group 1
PEG-3350; PEG-4 L the day previous of the study, starting at 17:00 and finishing at 21:00 h
PEG-3350 group 3
low-volume 2 L PEG-solution (same day of the procedure 06:00-08:00 am)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* the presence of a severe illness (cardiac, renal, or metabolic)
* major psychiatric illness
* known allergies to PEG-3350
* refusal to consent to the study
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Felix Tellez
Ph.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Felix Téllez-Ávila, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Instituto Nacional de ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Polkowski M, Rembacken B, Saunders B, Benamouzig R, Holme O, Green S, Kuiper T, Marmo R, Omar M, Petruzziello L, Spada C, Zullo A, Dumonceau JM; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45(2):142-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326186. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
Corporaal S, Kleibeuker JH, Koornstra JJ. Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;45(11):1380-6. doi: 10.3109/00365521003734158. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
Adams WJ, Meagher AP, Lubowski DZ, King DW. Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994 Mar;37(3):229-33; discussion 233-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02048160.
Jansen SV, Goedhard JG, Winkens B, van Deursen CT. Preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing different regimes. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Oct;23(10):897-902. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834a3444.
Marmo R, Rotondano G, Riccio G, Marone A, Bianco MA, Stroppa I, Caruso A, Pandolfo N, Sansone S, Gregorio E, D'Alvano G, Procaccio N, Capo P, Marmo C, Cipolletta L. Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Aug;72(2):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.048. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
Pontone S, Angelini R, Standoli M, Patrizi G, Culasso F, Pontone P, Redler A. Low-volume plus ascorbic acid vs high-volume plus simethicone bowel preparation before colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov 14;17(42):4689-95. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i42.4689.
Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ, Dertinger S, Layer P, Runzi M, Schneider T, Kachel G, Gruger J, Kollinger M, Nagell W, Goerg KJ, Wanitschke R, Gruss HJ. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;103(4):883-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
Abut E, Guveli H, Yasar B, Bolukbas C, Bolukbas FF, Ince AT, Kendir T, Dalay AR, Kurdas OO. Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
Enestvedt BK, Brian Fennerty M, Zaman A, Eisen GM. MiraLAX vs. Golytely: is there a significant difference in the adenoma detection rate? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Oct;34(7):775-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04795.x. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
Haapamaki MM, Lindstrom M, Sandzen B. Low-volume bowel preparation is inferior to standard 4 1 polyethylene glycol. Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):897-901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1293-6. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
DiPalma JA, McGowan J, Cleveland MV. Clinical trial: an efficacy evaluation of reduced bisacodyl given as part of a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution preparation prior to colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Oct 15;26(8):1113-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03459.x.
Hookey LC, Depew WT, Vanner SJ. Combined low volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard volume polyethylene glycol solution: a prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;20(2):101-5. doi: 10.1155/2006/621367.
Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ, Cryer B, Davila R, Cipher D, Harford WV. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.047.
Seo EH, Kim TO, Park MJ, Joo HR, Heo NY, Park J, Park SH, Yang SY, Moon YS. Optimal preparation-to-colonoscopy interval in split-dose PEG bowel preparation determines satisfactory bowel preparation quality: an observational prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):583-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.029. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):686-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.068.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
end-407-11-11-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id